Investors are Tariff-ied

In recent news, the economic landscape has been significantly influenced by President Trump's new tariff plans, a noticeable decline in consumer sentiment due to inflation worries, and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) announcing job cuts. These developments are shaping the market conditions and affecting investor sentiment.

Trump's Tariff Plans

President Trump's administration has introduced a series of tariffs aimed at protecting domestic industries and reducing the trade deficit. This week included some announcements from the White House that tariffs for Canada and Mexico will start on March 4th, and there will be an additional 10% tariff for China following the 10% added as of February 4th (20% total) that will go into effect on the same day. Thursday, Trump also announced a 25% tariff on imports from Europe. ?The White House announced Reciprocal tariffs on several nations after a study is completed by April 1. While initially, there was some relief for investors that these tariffs wouldn’t go into effect right away and that this was possibly more of a negotiation tactic, as we saw the Mexican and Canadian tariffs postponed after talks, but the rhetoric this week was rapid and enough to trouble investors.

These tariffs target a range of imported goods, from steel and aluminum to technology products. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index was hit hard on Tuesday on rumors the White House is considering more restrictions on chip exports to China. The primary goal of tariffs is to encourage American manufacturing by making imported goods more expensive, thereby leveling the playing field for local producers.

However, the ripple effects of these tariffs have raised concerns among investors. Higher import costs can lead to increased prices for consumers and businesses reliant on foreign materials. This, in turn, can reduce consumer spending and business investments, potentially slowing economic growth. Moreover, retaliatory tariffs from other countries may harm American exporters, further complicating the economic outlook.

Decreasing Consumer Sentiment

A significant consequence of the tariff plans is the decline in consumer sentiment. As prices for goods and services rise due to higher import costs, consumers may feel the pinch of inflation. Concerns over inflation can lead to decreased purchasing power and a general sense of economic uncertainty. When consumers expect higher prices in the future, they may cut back on spending, which can negatively impact demand for goods and services.

Investors focused on consumer confidence were rattled last week by Walmart’s lower earnings guidance, the February S&P Global US Services PMI slipping into contraction territory, and the decline in the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment report. Adding to concerns, this week’s Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index also fell, with respondents across these reports expressing fears over rising inflation and tariffs.

Consumer sentiment serves as a critical indicator of economic health. When confidence wanes, it can lead to reduced economic activity as households become more cautious with their finances. This reduction in spending can create a feedback loop, exacerbating economic slowdowns and making recovery more challenging. There is a very strong correlation between consumer confidence and the S&P 500's trend.

Impact of DOGE Job Cuts

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has announced plans to cut jobs as part of its efforts to streamline operations and reduce government spending. While the intention is to improve efficiency and save taxpayer money, the immediate consequences may include increased unemployment and reduced consumer spending among former government employees.

In a Fox Business article this week, Dante DeAntonio, labor economist for Moody’s Analytics told Fox “We estimate that about 100,000 federal workers have already been laid off or have accepted the deferred buyout offered by the Trump administration.” In a memo this week from the Trump administration, it told agencies to plan to prepare to cut staff and reorganize by March 13. In a cabinet meeting this week Trump gave the example that the 65% of the Environmental Protection Agency staff could be cut.

Job cuts in the public sector can have a cascading effect on the economy. As individuals lose their jobs, their disposable income decreases, leading to lower consumption of goods and services. This can further depress consumer sentiment and overall economic activity. Additionally, the job cuts may strain public services, affecting the quality and availability of essential services for communities.

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly - Spending Cuts

From a debt standpoint, the government needs to cut spending to reduce its budget deficit and/or raise taxes. As of February 26, the House passed a bill to pass along $4.5 trillion in tax cuts and $2 trillion in spending cuts. Whenever politicians review cuts, it becomes a very polarizing and debilitating task not just across the political aisle, but in their own parties. When you add treatment of certain states who are uniquely hit by cuts due to their industry concentration, it gets even worse in the Senate.

The upside to all the spending cuts discussion and possibly headwinds to the economy due to those cuts and the effect it has on displaced labor, has been lower interest rates and rising bond prices. Despite higher inflation numbers, investors are jumping into Treasuries, driving yields lower. I think this is a result of two items: spending cuts to address our debt (lower risk) and those cuts also potentially lowering the GDP of the U.S. (lower growth). Combined with a stock market that is valued above its 5-year average price-to-earnings ratio according to FactSet, and you have a setup for investor rotation to reduce stock and buy bonds.

If cuts don’t happen, and confidence is lost on the U.S.’s ability to pay back its debt, we could see our interest rates skyrocket like they have for countries with persistent debt problems. It wasn’t long ago that the global markets were rattled by the Sovereign Debt Crisis across Europe’s “PIGS” (Portugal, Italy, Greece, and Spain) that were eventually backstopped by the European Central Bank. The U.S. has already seen its debt downgraded by Standard & Poors as well as Fitch Ratings. Reducing the fiscal spending and trade deficit are crucial to the long-term success of the U.S. – but the short-term catalyst will be economic pain.

Conclusion

The interplay of President Trump's tariff plans, decreasing consumer sentiment due to inflation concerns, and job cuts by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) presents a complex economic scenario. While tariffs aim to protect domestic industries and encourage domestic manufacturing, they also risk raising prices and dampening consumer spending. The decline in consumer sentiment highlights the broader impact of these policies on household finances and spending. Meanwhile, job cuts in the public sector add another layer of economic uncertainty.

As these factors unfold, it will be difficult for policymakers to carefully consider the broader implications of their decisions and strive for a balance that supports both economic growth and stability. It’s clear that investors are a lot more concerned over tariffs and job cuts and the effect they are having on consumer sentiment, versus the possibility of tax cuts - as announced by the House of Representatives this week. Investors will need to carefully weigh the future growth potential of productivity gains from artificial intelligence, infrastructure investment, and robotics along with fiscal austerity (spending cuts) and the effect all will have on the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). As of this week, investors are voting with their trades and moving defensively.

As a reminder, to receive my weekly wrap up, financial planning topics, and monthly market observations, be sure to email me to subscribe to my free newsletter at [email protected], or subscribe on LinkedIn.

Content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or other advice.

There are risks involved in investing, including the potential for loss of principal.

Forward-looking statements are based on assumptions that may not materialize and are subject to risks and uncertainties.

Any mention of specific securities or investment strategies is not an endorsement or recommendation.

Advisory services offered through Financial Sense? Advisors, Inc., a registered investment adviser. Securities offered through Financial Sense? Securities, Inc., Member FINRA/SIPC. DBA Financial Sense? Wealth Management. Investing involves risk, including the loss of principle. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

?