## Introduction to EIGA Doc 121/14: Hydrogen Pipeline Design

The European Industrial Gases Association (EIGA) Document 121/14 provides a comprehensive framework for designing hydrogen pipelines. This document is essential for ensuring the safety, efficiency, and reliability of hydrogen transportation systems. With the increasing focus on hydrogen as a clean energy source, adhering to these guidelines is crucial for sustainable infrastructure development. This article delves into the intricacies of material selection for specific applications and systems, alongside a detailed examination of hydrogen piping and pipeline testing requirements.

### Material Selection for Specific Applications/Systems

Choosing the right materials for hydrogen pipelines is vital to prevent leaks, withstand high pressures, and resist the embrittlement effects of hydrogen. The EIGA Doc 121/14 outlines several key considerations:

1. Hydrogen Compatibility: Materials must be compatible with hydrogen to prevent embrittlement and ensure long-term integrity. Stainless steels (such as 316L) and high-nickel alloys are commonly used for their resistance to hydrogen embrittlement.

2. Corrosion Resistance: Materials should offer excellent resistance to corrosion, particularly in moist environments. This is crucial for maintaining the structural integrity of pipelines over time.

3. Mechanical Strength: The selected materials must possess high mechanical strength to withstand the operating pressures and environmental conditions typical of hydrogen pipelines.

4. Weldability: Materials should be easily weldable to ensure secure joints, which are critical points of potential failure in pipeline systems.

### Everything You Need to Know About Hydrogen Piping and Pipeline Tests

#### 1) Leak and Strength Test Before Operation

Every hydrogen piping and pipeline system must undergo rigorous leak and strength testing before being put into operation. This ensures that any potential issues are identified and resolved early, preventing future failures.

#### 2) Hydrostatic Leak Testing

When hydrostatic leak testing is impractical, alternatives such as pneumatic or combined hydrostatic-pneumatic testing can be employed. These methods involve using non-flammable and non-toxic gases to safely test the integrity of the piping.

#### 3) Alternative Testing Methods

If both hydrostatic and pneumatic leak tests are not feasible, alternative tests, including Non-Destructive Examination (NDE) and visual inspections, may be conducted. These methods are critical for ensuring the reliability of the system without compromising safety.

#### 4) Sensitive Leak Testing

Following hydrostatic testing, a sensitive leak test must be performed to detect even the smallest leaks. The sensitivity of this test should be greater than 10^?3 atm·mL/s under test conditions, ensuring that the system is thoroughly evaluated.

### Key Testing Parameters and Procedures

#### Hydrostatic Test Pressure

The hydrostatic test pressure for hydrogen piping (PT) is calculated using the formula:

\[ PT = 1.5 \times P \times \frac{Rr}{S} \]

Where:

- \( P \) = Internal design pressure

- \( PT \) = Minimum test pressure

- \( Rr \) = Ratio of stress value at test temperature (\( ST \)) to stress value at design temperature (\( S \)), not exceeding 6.5

- \( S \) = Stress value at design temperature

- \( ST \) = Stress value at test temperature

#### Pneumatic Leak Test Fluid

The fluid used for pneumatic leak testing must be air or a gas that is non-flammable and non-toxic, ensuring safety during the testing process.

#### Pneumatic Leak Test Pressure

The pneumatic leak test pressure (\( Pt \)) should adhere to the following criteria:

- \( Pt \geq 1.1 \times Pd \)

- \( Pt < 1.33 \times P \)

- \( Pt \) should not exceed 90% of the yield strength of the material

### Hydrogen Piping Test Steps

The testing steps for hydrogen piping include:

1. Gradually increase pressure to the smaller of half the test pressure or 170 kPa (25 psi) gage pressure.

2. Conduct initial inspections, focusing on joints.

3. Increase the pressure gradually in steps to achieve the test pressure.

4. Maintain the pressure at each step to balance strains in the piping.

5. Lower the pressure to the design pressure before checking for leaks.

### Sensitive Leak Test

The sensitive leak test involves:

1. Ensuring sensitivity more than 10^?3 atm·mL/s.

2. Testing at a pressure of at least 105 kPa (15 psi) gauge or 25% of the design pressure, whichever is smaller.

3. Gradually increasing the pressure to half the test pressure or 170 kPa (25 psi) gauge pressure.

4. Performing initial inspections, particularly of joints.

5. Increasing pressure gradually and maintaining it at each step.

### Post-Test Procedures

After testing, it is crucial to drain and flush the test fluids from the piping and components to prevent any potential contamination or corrosion.

### Alternative Leak Test

If traditional leak tests are impractical, alternative methods include:

1. NDE and visual examination for groove welds.

2. Liquid penetrant inspection for structural attachment welds, or magnetic particle method for magnetic materials.

3. Flexibility analysis as per ASME B31.3, para. 319.4.2(b), (c), and/or (d).

### Conclusion

Adhering to the guidelines set forth in EIGA Doc 121/14 ensures the safe and efficient design of hydrogen pipelines. By following the prescribed material selection criteria and rigorous testing procedures, engineers can develop robust hydrogen infrastructure essential for the energy transition. Stay updated on industry best practices and share your insights using the hashtag #HydrogenPipelineDesign.

---

This detailed analysis provides a comprehensive understanding of the material selection and testing requirements outlined in EIGA Doc 121/14 for hydrogen pipelines. By following these guidelines, industry professionals can ensure the development of safe, reliable, and efficient hydrogen transportation systems.