Introduction to Anticipatory Action in Humanitarian Operations

What is Anticipatory Action?

The concept of Anticipatory Action (AA) has emerged as a transformative approach. Rather than waiting for disasters to strike and then responding, AA involves taking proactive measures before a crisis occurs, based on forecasted risks and early warning indicators. This forward-thinking strategy is reshaping the landscape of humanitarian operations, promising efficient, cost-effective, life-saving activities against traditional reactive methods, especially in the early stages of emergency response.?

Anticipatory action is fundamentally rooted in the approaches of risk reduction and preparedness. By leveraging advanced technology, data analytics, and early warning systems, humanitarian organizations can anticipate impending disasters such as floods, droughts, or escalating conflicts. Armed with this foresight, they can implement targeted interventions to mitigate the impact on vulnerable communities, thereby preventing or minimizing the loss of life, livelihoods, and infrastructure while enabling better community resilience and ensuring faster recovery.?

Importance of Anticipatory Action in Humanitarian Settings

Traditional emergency response often falls short of addressing the full scope of a crisis, leading to inefficiencies, delays, and exacerbated suffering. AA offers a proactive, integrated, and holistic approach enabling aid agencies to act early and:

• Save Lives: By acting before a disaster or crisis strikes, humanitarian organizations can evacuate populations at risk, distribute emergency supplies, and implement early warning systems to alert communities, ultimately saving lives.
• Reduce Suffering: AA interventions focus on preventing or minimizing the impact of disasters, thereby reducing human suffering, displacement, and the long-term consequences on physical and mental health.?
• Enable Resilience: By safeguarding critical infrastructure, agricultural resources, and livelihoods, AA helps communities bounce back more quickly from disasters, promoting resilience and sustainable recovery.
• Promote community-led preparedness: ?AA would also promote that affected communities are at the heart of emergency preparedness planning taking early and proactive actions to protect their families and livelihoods and not just be considered as victims or beneficiaries at the receiving end of an emergency response.?
• Optimize Resources: Investing in preparedness and risk reduction measures is often more cost-effective than traditional emergency response. AA frameworks when implemented effectively and at proper scale could reduce the need for large-scale relief efforts and long-term rehabilitation.

Operationally, AA is not? designed to cover the whole cycle of emergency and disaster response activities from prevention, mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery, yet in most cases it could fill a critical gap and promote smooth linkages between disaster risk reduction and emergency preparedness activities with emergency response and recovery stages.?

Anticipatory Action Strategies in Humanitarian Operations?

AA in humanitarian operations encompasses a range of strategies and interventions aimed at reducing the impact of disasters before they occur. One effective approach involves the delivery of assistance through various modalities, tailored to the specific needs and vulnerabilities of at-risk communities.

• Cash assistance has emerged as a powerful tool in AA, offering flexibility, dignity, and empowerment to affected populations. Humanitarian organizations provide cash transfers to vulnerable households before an impending disaster, allowing them to purchase essential items, evacuate to safer locations, or invest in resilience-building measures. By enabling individuals to make choices according to their unique circumstances, cash assistance enhances the efficiency and effectiveness of the response, while also stimulating local markets and promoting economic recovery.

• In-kind assistance, such as emergency supplies, food, agricultural assets, and shelter materials, remains a cornerstone of AA efforts. Pre-positioning relief items in strategic locations enables rapid deployment in anticipation of forecasted disasters, ensuring timely access to lifesaving aid for affected communities. In-kind assistance is particularly valuable in contexts where cash may not be feasible or appropriate, such as remote areas with limited infrastructure or during sudden-onset emergencies where immediate needs must be met without delay.

• Training and capacity-building initiatives play a crucial role in strengthening the resilience of at-risk communities and enhancing their ability to anticipate, prepare for, and respond to disasters. Humanitarian organizations conduct workshops, simulations, and skill-building activities to impart knowledge and develop local capacities in disaster risk reduction, early warning systems, first aid, and other relevant areas. By empowering communities to identify risks, develop contingency plans, and mobilize resources proactively, training initiatives contribute to more effective AA and sustainable resilience.

• National social protection systems play a pivotal role in anticipatory action by providing a safety net for vulnerable populations before, during, and after disasters. Governments collaborate with humanitarian agencies to integrate anticipatory measures into existing social protection programs, such as cash transfer schemes, food assistance, and social insurance. By leveraging national systems and resources, anticipatory action can be scaled up more effectively, reaching larger populations and ensuring sustainable support for those most in need. Additionally, investing in national social protection mechanisms strengthens resilience and reduces dependence on external assistance, fostering long-term disaster risk management and sustainable development.
• Combining mixed approaches of? cash assistance, in-kind support, training, and community engagement, offer a comprehensive and adaptable approach to AA. Recognizing the diverse needs and contexts of affected populations, humanitarian organizations design interventions that leverage the strengths of each modality to maximize impact and efficiency. For example, a mixed approach may involve providing cash transfers for evacuation expenses or maintaining key livelihood assets, distributing emergency kits for immediate relief and protection, and conducting training sessions on disaster preparedness and response to enhance community resilience holistically.

Current Challenges in Scaling Up Anticipatory Action

Over the last decade, Humanitarian organisations have scaled up AA activities to become a main pillar of their global humanitarian strategies and frameworks.? Despite its proven benefits, scaling up AA initiatives comes with several challenges that could hinder widespread adoption and implementation in the humanitarian sector:

• Limited Funding for Scaleup: Anticipatory action requires upfront investment in preparedness, early warning systems, and capacity-building, with no-regret approaches. This may be overlooked in favour of other more visible or imminent emergency response and disaster management activities which are influenced by donor governments foreign policies, political agendas and at times public precipitations. Securing sustainable funding streams for AA projects remains a persistent challenge for proper scaleup to promote the full potential and impact of more efficient and effective responses to humanitarian needs globally.
• Data and Technology Gaps: Reliable data and advanced technology are essential for accurate risk assessment and early warning. However, many vulnerable regions lack access to robust data infrastructure, resources and skills, hindering the effectiveness of AA initiatives. Investments in data systems and innovative technologies for developing countries go beyond the objectives and capacity of current AA humanitarian frameworks.?
• Policy and Institutional Barriers: Institutional silos, bureaucratic hurdles, and fragmented policy frameworks can impede collaboration and coordination among stakeholders involved in AA efforts, limiting their impact and reach. AA frameworks need to be better linked or impeded into organizational risk management, emergency preparedness and response frameworks against current ad-hoc/pilot approaches. AA activities also require working across the nexus of development, humanitarian, human rights and other actors which remains a challenge in many contexts. Buy-in and participation by governments and de facto authorities are also critical to AA interventions where sub/national policies, development agenda, priorities and capacity could become additional enablers or barriers for successful scale-up.?
• Community Engagement: Successful anticipatory action relies on the active participation and cooperation of local communities. Building trust, raising awareness, and empowering communities to take proactive measures require sustained engagement and larger investment in social capital and community leadership beyond current practices in accountability to affected populations and other frameworks.
• Ethical Considerations: Given the above challenges, there is a need for more studies into how AA enables principled responses including the decisions made on the allocation of resources, the prioritization of interventions, and if there are unintended consequences to current practices. Balancing the imperative to act early with the need to ensure equity, accountability, and respect for humanitarian principles and human rights is a complex endeavour, especially for already marginalised local communities and special vulnerable groups.?

Key Online Resources on Anticipatory Action

Here are some key resources to learn more about AA:?

• The Anticipation Hub brings together partners across the Red Cross Red Crescent Movement, universities, research institutes, I/NGOs, UN agencies, governments, donors, and network initiatives and provides several resources including examples of projects, lessons learned and good practices from different regions in the world.??
• This Anticipation Hub 2022 Report captures the scale of AA worldwide and shows that there were 70 AA frameworks in place in 2022 covering 7.6 million people worldwide, ensuring they were better prepared to act ahead of the predictable impacts of hazards and faster recovery?
• The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) with the Red Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre, pioneered the Forecast-based Financing (FbF) approach.? A key element of FbF is that the allocation of financial resources is available in advance, together with the specific threshold that triggers the release of those resources for the implementation of targeted early actions. The roles and responsibilities of everyone involved in implementing these actions should be defined in the Early Action Protocol to ensure full commitment among the involved stakeholders.
• The Anticipatory Action Toolkit reflects the know-how that OCHA and partners gained during country pilots, where anticipatory action frameworks were set up in Bangladesh, Chad, Ethiopia, Malawi and Somalia. It is intended as a documented case study to reveal the processes, choices, evaluation and overview of action.
• The Locally Led Anticipatory Action Guide from the Global Network of CSOs for Disaster Risk Reduction supports civil society organisations to engage with communities and other actors and structures at the local level; to play a central role in planning and establishing local mechanisms for AA and drive the process of scaling up AA.
• Save the Children Framework for Anticipatory Action explains how AA fits within the scope of Save the Children’s work, outlines key components, as well as a broad ambition for our work on AA.
• The Developing an Anticipatory Action System Course from FAO uses examples and case studies from different countries and contexts to guide how to set up an anticipatory action system with a focus on AA in the context of food security and agriculture.

In Summary:? Anticipatory action represents a paradigm shift in humanitarian operations, offering a proactive and preventative approach to disaster and emergency response. By leveraging early warning systems, data analytics, and community engagement, humanitarian organizations can save lives, reduce suffering, and build resilience in the face of escalating risks. However, overcoming the challenges of funding, technology gaps, policy alignment, community engagement, and ethics is essential to realizing the full potential of AA and safeguarding the most vulnerable populations from future crises.

Feel free to share your insights in the comments section below?

What are the main challenges and opportunities for implementing anticipatory action activities in your region??

If you find this article relevant and useful please share forward with your network.?