Nice88 bet login registration.Enjoy Free 888+200 Daily Legal Bonus

What really happened in world politics that you don't know about?

The world is more than four years old. Yet the paradigms of thinking in how countries run are frequently run only four year cycles. Whilst that is democracy, freedom, Free speech, the vote, the right to have a say, the right of the people to have their say, yes, yes, yes that's all good. However there can be diametrically opposing strategic concepts thatt play out in the world within a very short succession of time. Who's fault is this? Nobody's fault at all. It's just democracy.?

However, there can be incredibly important information that falls through the middle of understanding. IE something happens under one Presidency that creates a world change, and then the next President comes in from a completely different perspective and has no option other than to adapt to all that went on before. Things in politics take time and in Geo-politics often more time. Yet, that does not fit with the instant now, need to know immediately frame of reference that most voters think within. So as the new government tried to adapt to the implications of the last government, there can be a flip-flop type of effect. Biggest gains of Obama, peace deal with Iran, Paris Climate Accord, biggest changes of Trump regression on Iran and Paris and yet massive progress on bringing troups home, and thus peace. Afghanistan falling squarely between the two administrations. It was his fault, no it was his fault. The truth is that the timing required to solve these most complicated issues in the world is longer than a four year term. Is it his fault or his fault? Neither, it's the fault of the expectation of immediate answers. Peace brokering take a whole whole lot of time and effort. Yet, from one government to the next eager to feed the electorate with what they want to here there can be a tendency to?adapt and adjust to that change and that is not easy at all. The adjustment is at least two years of the four year term. Add to that the noise on economy and there is a very good chance that the best thinking at any given moment simply does not find a way through.?

Yet these vast paradigm shifts base upon mostly US politics, geopolitically literally change the world.??

Never before in US history has this happened more so from between the time of 2017 until today.? From 2017 there was a new modality of peace making that emerged. Mostly due to desperation in really requiring an answer more so than anything else.?yet with the prospect tat the modern world could b turned in to two factions due to war. Win win ideologies were embraced and used.

President Obama had left office, there was a significant rivalry between the USA and Russia in Syria and yet also on the border of Russia. Then there was the issue of North and South Korea. Until that time in 2016, from all the way back to 1953, there had not even been a constructive meeting or discussion between the USA and North Korea.?

In the years since 1953, there had been three dynasties of the Kim family and never once had there been the chance and prospect of peace making and resolving the issues between South and North Korea. When I say South Korea what I'm really saying is South Korea and the USA and the West. North Korea meaning Russia and China.??

We had seen the proxy West East war play out in Vietnam. The differences between the people of the North and the South of the country being minimal and yet the two populations being drawn into either supporting the East or the West. The fall out of that had been a war to change the world, all over the world and yet even that, with millions dead or displaced was minimal in comparison to what could have played out in 2017 in the Korea's. For the first time two nuclear powers were going beyond sabre ratting to locking horns.??

Then in 2017 all of a sudden, something new happened. An interjection in the way of a document, that changed everything. Thank God. Without that, it's fairly clear and evident that we would have been marching then in 2017 towards an unreconcilable geo-political issue, the prospect of war, and in the true words of Pope Francis a war that could have cost the lives of half the world's population. Yet, something stopped that, only just.?

Here we were in a situation that the two term President Obama had cited as the most difficult to resolve issue of the Trump administration, and yet there was an answer. There was this 'something' that could give the concpet of the modern world more years to live, to exist.???

?Very much, behind the scenes, a document was written that had been designed using the same political strategy methodology that London's transport system had applied in 2004 to answer London's transport issues and problems.?

The same way of thinking, format of thinking was used in order to construct a methodology to change the narrative of nuclear button comparisons into talks. The peace roadmap that formed the basis of those first talks between the USA and North Korea all sides agreed to and took that path. The meetings were effectively written out for the first time ever as something like a stage script. There was a clear benefit and win to all sides following this path to diplomacy.?

The path did save the world from a major war, the same method was used many times afterwards and that's the reason why the USA did not enter into a war from 2017 on. The make America Great concept required finding a way to disengage from the very most complicated of issues internationally, diplomatically ever.?

The peace processes were made on a win-win through peace making method and process and two countries that played vitally important parts in this were Russia and China.?

However, the media did not adjust to the new peace making paradigm that had occurred. Therefore, whilst some of the most complicated issues were solved, others were not.

Russia had played a vitally important part in helping the USA be able to exit, leave and diplomatically resolve issues between countries in order to be able to bring troops home again to the USA. The make America Great Again concept in many ways actually did help the entire world to become more peaceful, improved diplomacy in many ways.?

Had there been full consideration of what had actually happened, rather than what was presented as happening the n the war in Ukraine in the separatist regions could possibly have been resolved many years ago. We are today in the midst of a situation where both sides are taking peace processes, yet simultaneously to that, the prospect of a larger war. the reality is that the best option in the we are better than them paradigm we all now find uorseves in is that peacemaking s the key. The best chance ofr the best prgress, for the best hope of a geoploitical future that is worth having.??

Countries have been around for 5,000 years or less, people here for 200,000 years and those that became people 60 million years. The climate much longer, yet never more changed than today and every security you have in your life is dependent in some way or another on climate.?

The climate conference is here and the question is being considered if governments are unable to either agree to a viable plan or listen to a viable plan to solve the global climate issues then is it in the world's best interest to have a massive war, a nuclear war? With temperatures getting above 50 degrees in places as diverse as India to Canada. with the Ice cap areas heating proportionately much faster thant anywhere else is the human race and most species and most other species actually doomed? Are foreign relations, just so bad there is no option other than major war? My answer to all the above is an emphatic NO. A definite no to all three considerations.?

There is a better way, and yet to get to that better way is firstly complicated, and secondly more complicated than considered. The answer to have got to a viable, good future has been almost there for thirty two years, yet few would listen enough. How can you expect people to sit and listen to a climate answer for five hours without interrupting, getting bored or distracted. So in place of not having anyone to really listen to the whole lot, I just carried on alone creating projects in alignment with the thinking, combining this with writing, putting out into the world concepts and then trying and testing these.?

My consultancy document to answer and solve London's transport crisis, I had originally mapped out in my mind and then added to this. It was a simplified version of the International climate model?

The real truth is that there have been repeated errors of judgement in the UK for 32 years by one government after another, the only exception to this in John Majors government. Other than that it's actually been the policy of the UK and the UK alone that has caused the world to not have an answer to both the climate crisis and to the geopolitical crisis that is edging the world towards either destruction of climate or war or both. Tradition in thinking has stood directly in the way of common sense, science, knowledge and information. Whilst the public do not know the how's and the why's to what has happened leaders of some other countries do. What has happened in the UK is that there has been a constant supressing of the best, seemingly the only answer that exists in the world that is by now tried, tested and proven to be able to answer and solve the climate issues on the scale and level which it's actually on.

In order to have had this answer has required 32 years of full time work, focussing specifically on one issue alone. That being how to answer and solve the biggest problems in the world affecting man for the duration of this century. That has been my effort, my commitment. My effort to spend 32 year working full time to test the increments, the required components of a methodology to answer and solve climate crisis. However, it's been impossible to get beyond what I consider institutional racism of the UK to have my work properly heard or used without it being stolen by people through privilege rather than ability happen to be in positions of authority. Since, 1991 they have not allowed this work to be known and from 2004 began trying to copy the work and excluding the climate agenda, from this climate work. This work that in 1997 Dame Anita Roddick described as being viable on a global International scale for use by all business. Additionally cited as workable and among the best climate work in the world by the former leader of the IPCC Dr Michael Dutschke. He was leading the IPCC at the time of it being awarded The Nobel Peace Prize at the same time Al Gore won it. I worked with Michael for two years on a continual basis and yet our work together was also blocked and stopped.?

So the truth is that whilst the world has been wondering how we answer and solve the climate question with one climate meeting after another the answer existed all the time in the UK and yet it has been and to this day still is blocked by the government from being known. Why? what could possibly be the agenda of holding back possibly the only way to keep humanity and it's failed development plan for the past 300 years continuing until there is no longer an answer other than either complete destruction of all or many of us by climate catastrophe, such as no water, which will inevitably lead to war. What can possibly be the agenda of stopping, obstructing, preventing the answer to survival?

I have to say that it is delusion, the cover up of corruption and abuse by those in power.?What's actually happened and is happening is that non sensical answers are being proposed and presented as an answer, as 'the answer' whilst obstructing the optimal answer. It's like they are presenting Reliant Robin, whilst simultaneously preventing a parallel advancement that could occur across all industries that replicates the advancement of EV.?The truth is there is more to the war in Ukraine that just West and East can't agree, there is a climate link to the war as well. The suppression of my climate work by the UK government on a continual basis, is holding back the advancement of the human race to such an extent, that words cannot even describe the travesty of what's happening. Whilst those?in government in the UK are obstructing this work, they are not even smart enough to even understand what they are doing and why this is actually not only causing them to endanger their own futures and agendas but everyone else in the process, without them even realising. It's a laughable situation if it was not so overwhelmingly, unbelievably serious.?

There are requests asking the world to do more, and yet it's the Uk government that has the best, tried and tested answer and yet they consistently have not wanted to know or to listen or properly understand how them plaguerising original political strategy content from 2004 has actually provided the finding to the best climate answer that exists in the world. Instead they perpetuate the lie, the reflection on the cave wall, rather than are capable of even properly understanding the work.?

Rishi Sunak citing renewable energy as the answer at COP27, is disconnected from the fact that his Conservative Party copied my work to create the feed in tariffs for renewables, and green investment bank and then messed it up to such an extent that many renewable energy companies went bankrupt, the biggest renewable energy utility companies start to fail, today the UK's biggest EV battery company close to bankruptcy.?

The Tory's Party in the past?do not understand green economics, they have been the most destructive organisation for the most advanced climate work, simply they have continually tried to copy and then sabotage due to short term thinking and immediate greed of those that have been copying the work without them even being aware enough to know what they were doing. Yet, before thinking Labour have the answer, they did the same, so too the Liberal Democrats and so too both politicl parties in the USA used my work, not ever once fully and properly. Whilst the former President Obama is right to say that there is a real risk to democracy, there is a risk to everything, to the way of life that is making life as it's been viable. Civilisations fail, if they do not evolve with the times. If they try to perpetuate divide and rule thinking, of classifying some people in one way and others in another this leads to failure.?

To have had green innovation grants thirty years ago in the developed and developing world in every city was possible with my work, and so much more than that. This would have provided the time and the resources to have adapted the entire concept of us having an infinite mindset when it comes to resource use on a planet with finite resources. what the elitist thinking in the UK has continually missed is the fact that the climate situation is caused by the combined affect of trillions and trillions of choices, action and decisions. The only way for people to be able to make better choices is by having access to information systems and methods that sought information. In order to have that requires the participation of the entire country, in order to have that requires communication hubs both in public and on the internet. Gordon brown was on the right track when he mentioned green lifestyle centres, and yet he didn't know how to progress these as he did not have the findings I had, having already done this. The government were clueless and together with big society and the third way just simply could not make these concepts actually work in order to be able to provide a way for society to be able to evolve into something that protects the interests of the future. The notion of presenting the climate issue as being something for the future generations is not relevant anymore, it's the generations of today that are the ones experiencing a planet with chaotic weather that is in a state of flux towards over all completely drying up.?

There have been so many attempts made by countries to hint at the issue, the problem that is holding the world back being a UK problem and yet one government after the other has simply not been willing, prepared or able to tell the truth. The most destructive policy any government has ever had as it's held back, stopped, prevented The Green Industrial Revolution from happening, ie the change that was required to world industry to be able to align and adapt to the needs of climate in time.?

So before Russia went into Ukraine, there it was, the image of industrialisation on the wall. The statements made in Russian media that they would not use nukes on Ukraine and Germany, yet the real cause of the issue is in the UK. It's the suppression of this climate work that Boris Johnson did, even when Hillary Clinton, one of the most informed of American's cited that Boris Johnson should release The integrity Initiative Report.?

If he would have done so then two principle considerations would be known. 1. There is a tried, tested and proven answer to solving climate change. 2. It's been suppressed in the UK since the 90's. 3. The author of the original work was blackmailed into self harm and having to attempt suicide and slice his own penis in half, without anaesthetic, to then check into The Priory in Woking in 2008 in order to discredit his own career, so that his masters could take his work on a continual basis.?4. That the UK since 2004 had such bullying as central to most policy making in government. This was under Blair, Brown, Cameron, Johnson as mayor and Trump as President

. The real reason for the Brexit vote was as a distraction after David Cameron was asked to produce the thesis of Big Society, which he said he would do, yet could not do as it was stolen. 5. The first conversation with the EU was to stop British people having human rights, the EU said no to this. President Macron cited that, 'The Liar left the stage the next day' John Major cited that there had been a 'fantasy in the long run up to brexit.'?

That quote to accurately reflect where the world has got to since, is better explained as 'There had been a fantasy in the long run up to Brexit that then went on to affect geopolitics so much that the issues had caused the incorrect representation of Russia and China, causing the diplomatic pressures through the continuing pressures on the border, yet without citing that during President Trump's time in office Russia had actually saved the world four three times from a major war. 1. Korea's. 2. Syria. 3. Venezuela 4. Azerbaijan and Armenia.

?In addition to this helping Afghanistan remain calm after the completely disorganised exit of Afghanistan that left billions if not trillions of dollars of equipment there which other wise could have been originally used to fund the answers to climate if the truth had been known previously that yes, there really is an answer to all aspects of climate that's been silenced?and that work is a part of the same work that prevented the world from going into war in 2017 in the Korea's and yet due to that being supressed in London, American's never got to know the full truth, that throughout the Trump presidency.

Two cases of more than eighty people killed twice. This is likely what led to the tit for tat during the time of Theresa May that included Grenfell Tower, yes that was not an accident but a planned event. The reasoning seemingly behind this was firstly due to a part of London going from Conservative to Labour firstly and secondly to perpetuate The Integrity Initiative, keep the slave producing more work and adapt it to an agenda that does not actually work.?

This writing is the reason that the USA did not enter into any wars during the Trump presidency. I was on a continual basis writing political strategy content and I knew if I stopped or was a bit too left field then crimes would happen. There are many other examples, one of these is the men stabbed in Reading during the time of the Black Lives Matter event when in the park there were four gay men murdered. This occurred a few days after the comment was made about 'birds being killed by windmills' made by President Trump. The culmination of their being just so much corruption in politics, has caused a continual blame game against other countries, the EU and then the narrative went onto Russia and China. That is not to say that these two countries are innocent of everything, however the hypocrisy of lecturing the East on human rights, whilst running the politics of the West via such levels of bullying, which of course other governments would be picking up on in communications even if the public are unaware of this has created a situation where the worlds geo-political landscape has been so changed. The narratives of left and right in the USA are still so divided mostly due to incomplete media for both the right and the left. The left wanting and needing effective climate action, the right wanting to bring resources back to the USA, yet in order to do that Trump was using throughout his time as President non-American intellectual resources to be able to answer the issues of the USA and the wider world. All of my work is for people and planet,. it's all for peace and diplomacy. Yet there have been times that people have been selective in trying to even reason my work and motive. So the motive originally was climate, then transport as a way of testing the method and then for peace making. If?all my work is used together then a great many of the problems in the world can be answered.?

The integrity initiative in the UK becoming too complicated to many people involved to be discussed.?Yet, the implications of all this have affected the world so, so much that no matter what statements are made by leaders to try and answer and solve the climate issues there is an underlying deception going on that is so far reaching that I do not know what else to do other than just tell the truth.?

The aspects of this I know about in the hope that common sense will emerge from this both in terms of peace making and climate and that tensions can calm, diplomacy can be restored that do result in peace making being possible with the war that's actually been caused by the incorrect representation of peace processes on a global level from 2017 until today. If it was known that Russia had prevented a major war so many times since 2017 then there would have been no reason for the West to have feared Russia and therefore no reason for Russia to have feared the West. There would have been friendship between countries, however the biased media presentation of peace processes in the West created the opposite effect. This I predicted before President Trump left office would happen. There had to be the correct representation of peace processes in order to be able to keep and maintain good enough International relations in order to prevent war, yet that was not allowed. Truth was banned from the media in the West.?

The continual attempts to limit the rights and the freedoms of the British people to a very significant extent going along with this has much more to do with the fact politicians want to avoid culpability.??

I'm in a situation where I have been encouraged by many sides to keep explaining what has actually occurred, to try to explain this and yet to try and provide viable answers from here back to a place of enough normality so that firstly the war can end as when the whole truth is known there is then the chance, the hope for world relations to be able to be restored by progressing national politics for the first time in decades beyond a type of dysfunctionality which is actually making stability of humanity as it's progressed seemingly impossible to maintain for very much longer. Yet, that is not really the case, there is a way through the middle. The superpowers of the world have to find a way back to truly representing stability and progress once again. If there are half truths, lies, misconceptions central to the thinking, biased opinions caused by incomplete information then we are in a place of a war playing out that could get worse and nobody actually being fully aware of how and what put the world into this situation where there are such differing narratives between west and east and then in various countries such different values between different people and between different generations too.

The old thinking of keeping things more or less as they are, keep the truth, whole truth and nothing but the truth very much controlled, is getting in the way of allowing the world to become the best of what it can be.?????

The pressure put onto Russia by the West has created a situation where Russia responded to putting pressure onto Ukraine in such a destructive way. What Russia has done and is doing to Ukraine is effectively what the West was effectively threatening Russia with. The lining up of troops on the border of Russia was a reckless policy.?

How could that not have created the fear, after the last time this occurred being operation Barbarossa, this causing for the Russian people on of the biggest traumas in it's history. What President Putin needs to consider is that it was not the people of Ukraine that were in any way involved in that and that Nato countries now realise that Russia does and has responded to threats. It's with this thought in mind that there is the possibility of hopefully talking back this war back to peace making. The Ukrainians being given the means to militarily protect themselves is not enough to stop the situation from being worse for everyone, it seems to me that the truth, all of the truth presented and explained is all that I can do.?

war is wrong for the people

The destruction of lights, of water supplies, of infrastructure the targeting of civilians, and doing so when going into the winter is as wrong as war can get. So too the damage to the bridge, the bombing of the harbour specifically protected under the grain deal. The combined actions of both sides is in a diminishing spiral that can only end by there being more good will and less, much less bad will in this war. Yet I do not believe that its possible for either the leader or Ukraine or Russia to be able to end this war alone. There is an 'underlying' narrative to all this that goes above the heads of people.?This war is considered to be a proxy war between The East and West and yet there is much more to this than is widely known. Whilst my agenda is to do all I can to end the war, there is a human rights issue going on below the surface that I believe relates to my situation. There is an extensive amount of information that is properly presented in the media could very much help end this war and help relations between West and East. This issue relates to the events in and around Ukraine and yet the issue is much more than that. In a nutshell, the issue relates to double standards and a massive hypocrisy that has occurred in the world. Whilst the West has been preaching to the East about human rights issues for decades, there was a massive human rights abuse in the West that occurred. The implications of this are so significant that the UK has been continuously trying to change human rights laws to it's own people in order to help try to allow the people that carried out this human rights abuse to be able to, for want of a better way of saying it, get away with it. It's done relates to this. We are all in it together relates to this', Brexit relates to this, and the first conversation with the EU after Brexit was to take the British people out of the Human Rights laws to which the EU flatly refused. John Major citing that, 'There was a fantasy in the long run up to Brexit' relates to this, so too does President Macron's statement that 'The liar left the stage the very next day.' David Cameron, Ken Livingstone, Gordon Brown and Phillip Hammond leaving UK Parliamentary politics may have something to do with this and so too the murder of MP. David Amess, the poisoning of the Skripols, the blowing up of the bridge to Russia and the blowing up of the Nord Stream pipeline. The statement 'It's done' was cited from the Summer.?This was before the blowing up of the bridge which was at the end of September.

?Russia obviously knows this, so the question has to be asked why would Russia make such an obvious error in it's statement? Well, if you were me it's very easy to be able to decode what Russia is actually saying.?

Russia, the UK and the USA do in actual fact know what's being referred too. It's actually the sabotaging of another 'pipeline' that is the it, that they keep referring too. 'It's done', could refer ton something else.?

. An Independent peace strategist that provided the original peace roadmap that was written to start the diplomacy between the USA, North and South Korea. The same peace process that President Putin referred to when he said, 'The peace process for talks between North and South Korea is the best hope for successful negotiations with Ukraine'. After that statement was made I contacted the UK government various times to try to obtain support from the government. I went to my local MP's office twice. I wrote to him and the MP from Plymouth, a former veteran in Afghanistan. I spoke to the Foreign office, I wrote to the BBC. I spoke with The Ministry of Defence. I wrote to the Prime Minister. I tried everything I could to obtain any acknowledgment or support to go to Russia and Ukraine officially as i knew that it was my peace roadmap that was being referred too. I could not get an answer. I tried even to go to the police twice. I spoke with one police officer at a main centre for policing near Weston Super Mare. He did not know how to respond other than to bring two psychiatric nurses. They interviewed me for a few minutes and I told them that I too was qualified in three fields of therapy. After a few minutes speaking with me, they said that I was fully well. The policeman later explained that he did not know how to deal with the issue as he is more used to dealing with day to day policing and that the issue was not the remit of the police.?Without any help or support, I knew that it was my peace roadmap work being referred too yet the government under Boris Johnson would not acknowledge my work. Why? Firstly, my previous strategy work had found answers to help treat COVID19 before science had a vaccination.?These findings were recognised by a medically trained MP. They were also later confirmed as being true and legitimate by Edenburough University findings and findings from Imperial College in London and other parts of the world. 2. Boris Johnson built his career by copying my work as Mayor of London. This is together with Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, David Cameron and others. So in order to cover up corruption of individuals at the top of government not only was legitimate science that could have saved thousands of lives covered up whilst they partied. There were people in government profiting from vaccines. What's more, whilst the public were in lockdown, fearful of going outside due to what the government were telling them. Boris Johnson had information that enabled them to realise that if they got Covid they would be able to treat the virus naturally and effectively. This could be the reason why they most likely had no fear or concerns themselves in breaking social distancing rules themselves and partying.??

So in the Summer of this year, whilst I endeavored?try to obtain information by travelling that could enable there to be a peace roadmap written, using the same methodology that Russia had said was the best chance for successful negotiations with Ukraine. Even without the help and the support of the government I bought a visa for Russia and intended to travel there and to Ukraine in order to be able to write a viable peace roadmap. I took a flight to Turkey and the day before I was due to fly to Moscow, I was involved in a motorbike accident. The circumstances surrounding this accident were suspicious and the accident was very serious. I rolled out of the way of an oncoming vehicle that was travelling at approximately forty miles per hour, with one second to spare without being run over.?

After the accident I had injuries to four of my limbs. I was cut and bruised over a significant part of my body. My left arm will never fully recover from the accident. I had had communications both before and after the accident that made me realise that I was being stopped from travelling to use the peace roadmap and negotiation method that had been cited.?

I have good reason to suspect that the statement made by Liz Truss, 'it's done' could have happened at the time of this 'accident'. I believe that Boris Johnson's government attempted to murder me in order to prevent a peace process from being successful between Russia and Ukraine.?

Boris Johnson by witholding information on Covid treatments that he may well have used himself, by lying to the public from his first term as mayor in the context to the work he presented as his own, ie Boris bikes and many other concepts. By talking up war with Russia as Foreign Minister, by witholding information on peace roadmaps and peace processes that Russia helped mediate, ie in the context of The Korea's, and Syria.?

By provoking Russia at the same time by carrying out press conferences at a bombing command centre in Kent. by refusing to acknowledge the peace roadmap method being referred to by Vladamir Putin, then later used by President Trump, even though it's authored by a British national, then being aloof towards peace making, whilst at the same time trying to take away the rights of all British people to be able to protest. He is responsible for his involvement in not only one but two genocides, one against the Ukrainian people by perpetuating the war and simply supplying weapons and yet this is taking attention away from his previous genocide on the British people which is from him witholding vital information that could have saved many peoples lives. This is whilst his cabinet had previously talked of euthanasia, this is in conjunction to him sending infected people with the virus around care homes and then even after that refusing to meet with the people's families.

What I will finish off by saying is that the true knowledge and information in the context of peace roadmaps and peace processes together with the incorrect and illegal copying and use of political strategy work and then the lies, deceit, cover up of all of this MP's know only some of what's actually occurred.?

?Liz Truss taking up office as Prime Minister would have access to information she would have never seen previously. This would include the report of 'The integrity Initiative'?This is the document that Hillary Clinton cited publicly to Boris Johnson when he took up office as Prime Minister should be made public. If he would have made that public, then there is no chance that there would be a war in Ukraine today on the scale that it's on.?

Why? It would have been publicly known that in 2017 the actions of Russia had saved the world twice from a major war, once in the Korea's and once in Syria.

?Russia, saved Nato in Syria by mediating between Turkey, Israel and Syria. This was together with Mike Pence, the peace roadmap they were using for this was written by a British national, myself. This is where the term Buffer Zone for peace making purposes first became used.?That and many other aspects of that peace roadmap helped save the world from a major war and whilst Russia was the central player in that whilst the Allies were pulling out, the full explanation of this has been left unknown as a result of The Integrity Initiative report not being made public and myself being blacklisted from being represented in the Uk media, even though my peace roadmap work has helped the UK and the world many times.??

This requires the capacity of both people. What's clearly evident though is that the more the losses to the Ukrainian people, the more so there with be more Russian people opposing the war in Russia. What the miscalculation is by Russia is that the Russian people do not 'hate' the people of Ukraine, they perceive them as being 'the same people as themselves'. Even those in Russia that support the war, many of those people feel an affinity to the people of Ukraine and yet it's the government policies of one side or another that the people do not like.?

What is so different between the 20th and the 21st Centuries is that people in one country relate better to people in other countries frequently more than they feel an affinity to their own government and that is the same the world over. So an attack on people by any leader is an attack on all the people.?

The recession is caused by a war that is solvable. The USA is the best country in the World. China is the best country in the world, The Uk is the best country in the World, no Canada is. We have got to get beyond this type of childish politics. The world is so, much better than any one county alone" These a truth.

What really happened in world politics that you don't know about?

The world is more than four years old. Yet the paradigms of thinking in how countries run are frequently run only four year cycles. Whilst that is democracy, freedom, Free speech, the vote, the right to have a say, the right of the people to have their say, yes, yes, yes that's all good. However there can be diametrically opposing strategic concepts thatt play out in the world within a very short succession of time. Who's fault is this? Nobody's fault at all. It's just democracy.?

However, there can be incredibly important information that falls through the middle of understanding. IE something happens under one Presidency that creates a world change, and then the next President comes in from a completely different perspective and has no option other than to adapt to all that went on before. Things in politics take time and in Geo-politics often more time. Yet, that does not fit with the instant now, need to know immediately frame of reference that most voters think within. So as the new government tried to adapt to the implications of the last government, there can be a flip-flop type of effect. Biggest gains of Obama, peace deal with Iran, Paris Climate Accord, biggest changes of Trump regression on Iran and Paris and yet massive progress on bringing troups home, and thus peace. Afghanistan falling squarely between the two administrations. It was his fault, no it was his fault. The truth is that the timing required to solve these most complicated issues in the world is longer than a four year term. Is it his fault or his fault? Neither, it's the fault of the expectation of immediate answers. Peace brokering take a whole whole lot of time and effort. Yet, from one government to the next eager to feed the electorate with what they want to here there can be a tendency to?adapt and adjust to that change and that is not easy at all. The adjustment is at least two years of the four year term. Add to that the noise on economy and there is a very good chance that the best thinking at any given moment simply does not find a way through.?

Yet these vast paradigm shifts base upon mostly US politics, geopolitically literally change the world.??

Never before in US history has this happened more so from between the time of 2017 until today.?

From 2017 there was a new modality of peace making that emerged. Mostly due to desperation in really requiring an answer more so than anything else.?