Internet of Things [IoT] Challenge: The Sensor That Cried Wolf
Bill Schmarzo
Dean of Big Data, CDO Chief AI Officer Whisperer, recognized global innovator, educator, and practitioner in Big Data, Data Science, & Design Thinking
My daughter called with a frantic message. She was driving my car (why she was driving my car when she has her own is the subject for another time) and a warning message appeared on the car console: “Engine overheated! Stop engine and allow to cool down” (see Figure 1).
Figure 1: Engine Overheated Warning Message
Fortunately, my daughter was nearly home, so she got the car home, shut it down and called me immediately (I was on the road somewhere…Washington DC, Philadelphia, Knoxville, Chicago, Toronto…I don’t even remember where anymore). I called my trusty mechanic (Chuck) and he was able to work my car into the schedule when I got back home.
So Friday morning I gingerly drove the car to the mechanic (about 2 miles away) and waited for the verdict. Here is the conversation with Chuck:
Chuck: “We found the problem and it’s a sensor that is broken.”
Me: “So the engine was not actually overheating.”
Chuck: “Correct”
Me: “What is it going to cost to replace the sensor?”
Chuck: “Unfortunately the sensor is buried in the engine, so there is quite a bit of work required just to get to it. So it’s going to cost about $500 to replace the sensor.”
Me: “So let me get this clear; it’s going to pay $500 to fix a problem that doesn’t exist?”
Chuck: [Very long pause] “Yep”
So I am paying $500 to fix a problem (overheating engine) that does not exist. And, problems like these could get a lot worse in our new “smart” world.
The Sensor That Cried Wolf
As more and more sensors get added to more and more appliances, vehicles, devices, machinery, equipment, and devices, the probability and impact of the false positives as they become connected in the Internet of Things world grows exponentially. The interplay between the sensors and any malfunctions (whether sensors wearing out or poorly designed sensors or criminally hacked) dramatically increases the potential of the Internet of Things world sending out false messages – sensors “crying wolf” about a problem that does not really exist.
And while these inadvertent messages can quickly wear down the customer experience, fixing these false positives costs money – real money – and likely real money to the customer.
Complexity seldom works to the benefit of the user or customer. Adding more sensors to any device increases the potential to negatively impact the customer experience if manufacturers do not give careful consideration to where and how these sensors are going to make the life of the customer – my life – better. Paying to fix problems that do not exist is not a good start.
Customer Experience / Customer Satisfaction Ramifications
Many of today’s leading digital organizations go to great lengths to drive a more compelling, more engaging customer experience; to simplify the key decisions that their customers need to make, such as:
- Uber simplifying my decision how to get from where I currently am, to where I need to be (and in a very creative yet informative interface that allows me to track the exact location of my driver)
- Amazon who seems never satisfied in improving their customers’ experience from one-click ordering to their “Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought” recommendations to Prime service
- Chipotle and Starbucks mobile ordering (they enable me to order favorite selections at my favorite stores with only a couple of clicks of the button)
- Concur who has made expense reporting almost (almost) bearable with how they have simplified the entry of expense items
There are others as well who got the memo about the importance of providing a more engaging customer experience and the resulting increase in customer satisfaction, customer loyalty and customer advocacy and likelihood to recommend.
The Internet of Things fascination with more and more sensors to capture more and more data can undo all of this if organizations don’t address a couple of key questions upfront of their Internet of Things initiative:
- Does the collection of the data improve my user experience, or does it only provide the manufacturer with more ways to exploit my personal usage?
- What are the potential customer experience, customer satisfaction and customer advocacy ramifications of the above question?
Summary
Let’s not make the classic Silicon Valley mistake: just because you can do something with technology does not necessary mean it is the right thing to do. Seriously contemplate the objectives of your Internet of Things strategy and ask a simple question:
Does all the added complexity benefit the customer or does it just benefit your organization?
Ask yourself “How tolerant are my customers going to be to pay to fix problems that don’t exist?”
If the added benefit does not outweigh the added cost and complexity, rethink your Internet of Things strategy and approach, and rethink that strategy and approach from the perspective of your customers. Getting things right with your customers is usually a pretty good strategy.
--------------------
Thanks for taking the time to read my post. I’m fortunate that I spend most of my time with very interesting clients which fuel many of my topics. I hope that you are able to leave a comment or some thoughts about the blog. If you would like to read my regular blogs, please follow me on LinkedIn and/or Twitter.
In case you are interested, here are some of my favorite posts:
· Determining the Economic Value of Data
· The Big Data Intellectual Capital Rubik’s Cube
· How to Avoid “Orphaned Analytics”
· To Achieve Big Data’s Potential, Get It Into The Boardroom
· Big Data Business Model Maturity Index (animation)
· How I’ve Learned To Stop Worrying And Love The Data Lake
I am the author of two Big Data books: “Big Data: Understanding How Data Powers Big Business” and “Big Data MBA: Driving Business Strategies with Data Science”. I also teach the "Big Data MBA" at the University of San Francisco (USF) School of Management, where I was named the School of Management’s first Executive Fellow. The opportunity to teach at USF gives me the perfect petri dish to test new ideas and concepts both in the classroom and in the field with clients.
Sales and Business Development Executive: VP Sales at Simularity
8 年I understand your frustration Bill but you are not considering the big picture... or what will soon be the big picture. That lonely sensor is probably not currently connected into the car manufacturer's network and so it's failure is a missed opportunity. If we envision the IOT as your titles suggests, then there would be a network gathering engine data and hopefully feeding that data into an analytic engine - ideally an AI driven self learning system like ours. The manufacturer could get an alert that your sensor is about to fail, and so your daughter would not have to end up in a panic. It doesn't solve the problem of the faulty sensor, but in the long run the analysis will improve the quality of the sensors and the engine itself, reducing costs and improving your experience - but not until these things are connected, gathering data, and having analytics applied.
Executive Technology Leader passionate about Growth | Results & Success motivated | Business Strategy | Startup Investor & Advisor | Ex-Verizon, SAP, Oracle
8 年Oh Bill! I so relate! I got a BMW when we worked together at BOBJ and have had this exact experience more than once! So exasperating to those of us who appreciate data. What saves me is the quality of the service support from BMW and their chagrin over the situation. We all have to be cognizant over the cost/value of the data in these situations, not to mention the comprehension and utilization of what to do with the data. I ??the future.
Digital Sales Specialist at Equinix.
8 年I really enjoyed this. It made me think about the challenge ahead for how to design products that provide the preventative and prescriptive features that we all clamor for, but do it in a way that doesn't create a large burden on the consumer. Could they have multiple sensors so that a failure of a sensor could be detected, or could they just engineer the product in a way that sensors are a simpler replacement. It's a pretty big challenge when you look at a complicated system like a car, but we'll learn and get better over time.
Regulatory Readiness Consultant
8 年Thanks Bill. I had to laugh at this one because I have the same problem with the tire sensor on my car. If I were to believe the sensor, I have been driving on a flat tire for the past six months. The difference is that I can inspect the tires any time I get in the car. With an engine sensor, most people would be driving with the fear of the unknown each day. The end result is less faith in the technology and the data.
"Does the collection of the data improve my user experience, or does it only provide the manufacturer with more ways to exploit my personal usage?" I enjoyed your article and immediately Schr?dinger's cat sprung to mind (metaphorically). You impact what you observe and conversely if you don't observe it - doesn't mean it did or didn't happen! Let's take another look at your BMW... what a different conversation you'd be having with your daughter if the engine had seized without warning, much less how happy you'd be with your mechanic! I think the truth of the customer experience is that your glad it's only $500 and that your engine isn't in dire need of replacement; and that ultimately we are better off with more information so we can make up our own mind about what actions to take or not to take. Will you replace the sensor? Of course. Why? Because the risk is far greater without it. How does the manufacturer fair? They sell you a new $15 sensor and you spend $485 having it installed. They have done you an absolute service and will continue to protect you from yourself, once you re-install the sensor!