Interface fidelity, costs, and training effectiveness with Motion Systems' RCM

In the comprehensive report titled "Collective Simulation-Based Training in the U.S. Army" (https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2250.html) we explore the cutting-edge military training methods employing various simulator types by the U.S. and British armed forces. This article illuminates the two primary categories of simulators: PSME (Physically Simulated Military Equipment) and VME (Virtual Military Equipment), including training software like the Army's Games for Training (GFT).

PSME – Physically Simulated Military Equipment

The PSME category features advanced simulators like the Close Combat Tactical Trainer (CCTT) and Aviation Combined Arms Tactical Trainer (AVCATT). These simulators offer substantial physical fidelity but may not replicate all aspects of the battlefield environment, such as physical vehicle movement or specific tank commander tasks.

VME – Virtual Military Equipment

VME simulators, while less physically realistic, are markedly more cost-effective regarding operation, maintenance, and upgrades than PSME. Studies show that for collective training, psychological fidelity is often more critical than physical fidelity. Simulations like VME can be highly effective, especially when they focus on psychological fidelity. Their affordability and accessibility are added advantages.

Motion Systems' RCM – Revolutionizing VME

In line with these developments, Motion Systems introduces its innovative product – the RCM (Reconfigurable Cockpit Module). The RCM exemplifies the advancement in VME systems, offering a modular and flexible solution for training in various simulated environments. This product aligns perfectly with the industry’s shift towards more accessible, cost-effective, and psychologically accurate simulation training methods.

Balancing Fidelity and Cost

The importance of physical fidelity should not overshadow psychological fidelity. Graphs in the report highlight the significance of psychological fidelity in effective learning and training outcomes. VME simulators, which heavily utilize VBS 3 technology, underscore this point.

CCTT and AVCATT vs. GFT

The report compares established programs like CCTT and AVCATT with GFT. CCTT and AVCATT have set utilization metrics and contractual reporting requirements, whereas GFT is newer and less stable. VME emerges as a more economical option than PSME, leading to potential cost savings.

Transition to VME and Synthetic Training Environments (STE)

The shift from CCTT and AVCATT to VME is pivotal, especially with the emergence of Synthetic Training Environments (STE). This transition focuses on enhancing accessibility and reducing training costs, allowing for investment in modern training methods.

The Way Forward with Motion Systems' RCM

In summary, effective Simulation-Based Training (SBT) requires a balance between psychological and physical fidelity while managing costs. The development of VME systems, like Motion Systems' RCM, alongside PC-based simulation solutions, paves the way for more efficient and economical military training. Embracing a balanced approach to fidelity is essential in the future planning of military training systems.