Institutional Responsibility in Resisting Perpetrator Manipulation and Modeling Ethical Behavior
By Ruth Reymundo Mandel

Institutional Responsibility in Resisting Perpetrator Manipulation and Modeling Ethical Behavior

Institutions play a crucial role in shaping societal norms and behaviors. However, they can inadvertently become tools for perpetrators of domestic abuse or even engage in behaviors that model coercive control & violence. To create a safer, more equitable society, institutions must take responsibility for resisting manipulation and reforming their own practices. Here are key areas where institutions need to focus:

1. Recognizing Institutional Vulnerabilities

Institutions must first acknowledge their susceptibility to manipulation by domestic abuse perpetrators. As outlined in the PerpManipulation document, systems like child protection services, family courts, and law enforcement are often targeted by abusers seeking to extend their control over survivors and children. Institutions should:

- Conduct thorough self-assessments to identify potential vulnerabilities

- Map out how perpetrators might attempt to manipulate their systems

- Develop strategies to close these loopholes and resist exploitation

2. Addressing Inherent Biases and Harmful Practices

Many institutions have longstanding practices that inadvertently reinforce harmful power dynamics or discriminate against certain groups. To combat this, institutions should:

- Examine their history and identify patterns of behavior that may cause trauma or reinforce coercive control

- Actively work to dismantle gender biases, racial prejudices, and other forms of systemic discrimination

- Develop policies and practices that prioritize empowerment and support over punishment and coercion

3. Promoting Domestic Abuse-Informed Practices

Institutions must adopt a domestic abuse-informed approach to better serve families and resist perpetrator manipulation. This includes:

- Providing comprehensive training on domestic abuse dynamics, including coercive control, to all staff

- Implementing tools and frameworks, like the Safe & Together Model, to guide decision-making and interventions

- Focusing on perpetrator patterns of behavior rather than incident-based assessments

-creating social & support programs which support victim survivors to maintain their safety, autonomy while focusing on & manditing to the person causing harm in the home. Creating behaviorally based programs that are affordable, and accessible without court orders which assist domestic abusers with their behavioral challenges & assess their ability & willingness to change based on reported positive behavioral changes or ongoing behavioral patterns of coercive control & violence by their victims.

4. Fostering Interagency Collaboration

Siloed responses make institutions more vulnerable to manipulation. To counter this, institutions should:

- Develop strong partnerships with other agencies and organizations

- Implement data-sharing protocols to ensure a more comprehensive understanding of family situations

- Create multi-disciplinary teams to address complex cases involving domestic abuse

5. Prioritizing Accountability and Transparency & Information sharing Domestic Abuse informed data

Institutions must be willing to examine their own behaviors and be held accountable for their actions. This involves:

- Establishing clear protocols for addressing staff misconduct or institutional failures

- Regularly reviewing and updating policies and procedures based on best practices and emerging research

- Being transparent about decision-making processes and welcoming feedback from the communities they serve

-Gathering impact data based on end-user reported increases in Satisfaction with services, Safety, Stability, Self-Determination, over all Wellbeing.

6. Supporting and Empowering Staff

Frontline workers often bear the brunt of institutional pressures and perpetrator manipulation attempts. Institutions should:

- Provide ongoing support and resources to help staff manage the emotional toll of their work

- Empower workers to make informed decisions based on their professional judgment and domestic abuse-informed practices

- Create a culture that values critical thinking and reflective practice

7. Advocating for Systemic Change

Institutions have a responsibility to push for broader societal changes that support survivors and hold perpetrators accountable. This includes:

- Advocating for legislative reforms that address gaps in current laws and policies

- Participating in public awareness campaigns to educate communities about domestic abuse

- Supporting research initiatives that contribute to a better understanding of effective interventions

Conclusion

Institutions wield significant power in shaping societal norms and behaviors. By taking responsibility for their own practices, resisting perpetrator manipulation, and modeling ethical behavior, they can play a crucial role in creating a society that truly supports survivors and holds abusers accountable. This institutional change is essential for driving broader societal transformation and fostering a culture of safety, respect, and equality for all.

For more information on Perpetrator Manipulations of specific systems please see this resource: https://safeandtogetherinstitute.com/how-domestic-violenceperpetrators-manipulate-systems/#:~:text=Perpetrators%20manipulate%20systems%20to%20bolster,professionals%20involved%20with%20the%20family .

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了