INSIGHTS

?

The provisions of Section 399 of the Companies Act, 2013, provides that:

“Inspection, Production and Evidence of Documents Kept by Registrar

(1) Save as otherwise provided elsewhere in this Act, any person may—

(a) inspect by electronic means any documents kept by the Registrar in accordance with the rules made, being documents filed or registered by him in pursuance of this Act, or making a record of any fact required or authorised to be recorded or registered in pursuance of this Act, on payment for each inspection of such fees as may be prescribed;

(b) require a certificate of the incorporation of any company, or a copy or extract of any other document or any part of any other document to be certified by the Registrar, on payment in advance of such fees as may be prescribed:

Provided that the rights conferred by this sub-section shall be exercisable—

(i) in relation to documents delivered to the Registrar with a prospectus in pursuance of section 26, only during the fourteen days beginning with the date of publication of the prospectus; and at other times, only with the permission of the #Central Government; and

(ii) in relation to documents so delivered in pursuance of clause (b) of subsection (1) of section 388, only during the fourteen days beginning with the date of the prospectus; and at other times, only with the permission of the Central Government.

(2) No process for compelling the production of any document kept by the Registrar shall issue from any court or the [Tribunal] except with the leave of that court or the [Tribunal] and any such process, if issued, shall bear thereon a statement that it is issued with the leave of the court or the Tribunal.

(3) A copy of, or extract from, any document kept and registered at any of the offices for the registration of companies under this Act, certified to be a true copy by the Registrar (whose official position it shall not be necessary to prove), shall, in all legal proceedings, be admissible in evidence as of equal validity with the original document.”

This means any person may inspect by electronic means and document/s kept by the Registrar, on payment of nominal fees, as may be prescribed. Further, a copy of, or extract from, any document kept by the Registrar, shall, in all legal proceedings, be admissible in evidence as of equal validity with the original document.

The provisions of Rule 15 of the Companies (RegistrationOffices and Fees) Rules, 2014, provides that:

“Inspection of Documents. Any person may –

(a) inspect any document kept by the Registrar, being documents filed or registered by him in pursuance of this Act or the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) or making a record of any fact required or authorised to be recorded or registered in pursuance of this Act, on payment for each inspection of fee.

(b) require a certificate of incorporation of any company, or a copy or extract of any other document or any part of any other document to be certified by the Registrar, on payment of fee.

Provided that no person shall be entitled under section 399 to inspect or obtain copies of resolutions referred to in clause (g) of sub-section (3) of section 117 of the Act.”

This means any person may inspect by electronic means and document/s kept by the Registrar, on payment of nominal fees, as may be prescribed. However, no person shall be entitled under section 399 to inspect or obtain copies of resolutions referred to in clause (g) of sub-section (3) of section 117 of the Act.

The provisions of Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 provides that:

Admissibility of Electronic Records:

“In any proceedings where it is desired to give a statement in evidence by virtue of this section, a certificate doing any of the following things, that is to say, --

(a) identifying the electronic record containing the statement and describing the manner in which it was produced;

(b) giving such particulars of any device involved in the production of that electronic record as may be appropriate for the purpose of showing that the electronic record was produced by a computer;

(c) dealing with any of the matters to which the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) relate,

and purporting to be signed by a person occupying a responsible official position in relation to the operation of the relevant device or the management of the relevant activities (whichever is appropriate) shall be evidence of any matter stated in the certificate; and for the purposes of this sub-section, it shall be sufficient for a matter to be stated to the best of the knowledge and belief of the person stating it.”

This meansSection 65B(4) requires the production of a certificate that, among other things, identifies the electronic record containing the statement, describes how it was produced, and provides details of the device used to produce the electronic record to demonstrate that the electronic record was produced by a computer, either by a person holding a responsible official position in relation to the case or by a third party.

The provisions of Section 399 of the Companies Act, 2013, provides that:

“Inspection, Production and Evidence of Documents Kept by Registrar

(1) Save as otherwise provided elsewhere in this Act, any person may—

(a) inspect by electronic means any documents kept by the Registrar in accordance with the rules made, being documents filed or registered by him in pursuance of this Act, or making a record of any fact required or authorised to be recorded or registered in pursuance of this Act, on payment for each inspection of such fees as may be prescribed;

(b) require a certificate of the incorporation of any company, or a copy or extract of any other document or any part of any other document to be certified by the Registrar, on payment in advance of such fees as may be prescribed:

Provided that the rights conferred by this sub-section shall be exercisable—

(i) in relation to documents delivered to the Registrar with a prospectus in pursuance of section 26, only during the fourteen days beginning with the date of publication of the prospectus; and at other times, only with the permission of the #Central Government; and

(ii) in relation to documents so delivered in pursuance of clause (b) of subsection (1) of section 388, only during the fourteen days beginning with the date of the prospectus; and at other times, only with the permission of the Central Government.

(2) No process for compelling the production of any document kept by the Registrar shall issue from any court or the [Tribunal] except with the leave of that court or the [Tribunal] and any such process, if issued, shall bear thereon a statement that it is issued with the leave of the court or the Tribunal.

(3) A copy of, or extract from, any document kept and registered at any of the offices for the registration of companies under this Act, certified to be a true copy by the Registrar (whose official position it shall not be necessary to prove), shall, in all legal proceedings, be admissible in evidence as of equal validity with the original document.”

This means any person may inspect by electronic means and document/s kept by the Registrar, on payment of nominal fees, as may be prescribed. Further, a copy of, or extract from, any document kept by the Registrar, shall, in all legal proceedings, be admissible in evidence as of equal validity with the original document.

?

The provisions of Rule 15 of the Companies (RegistrationOffices and Fees) Rules, 2014, provides that:

?

“Inspection of Documents. Any person may –

(a) inspect any document kept by the Registrar, being documents filed or registered by him in pursuance of this Act or the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) or making a record of any fact required or authorised to be recorded or registered in pursuance of this Act, on payment for each inspection of fee.

(b) require a certificate of incorporation of any company, or a copy or extract of any other document or any part of any other document to be certified by the Registrar, on payment of fee.

Provided that no person shall be entitled under section 399 to inspect or obtain copies of resolutions referred to in clause (g) of sub-section (3) of section 117 of the Act.”

This means any person may inspect by electronic means and document/s kept by the Registrar, on payment of nominal fees, as may be prescribed. However, no person shall be entitled under section 399 to inspect or obtain copies of resolutions referred to in clause (g) of sub-section (3) of section 117 of the Act.

The provisions of Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 provides that:

Admissibility of Electronic Records:

“In any proceedings where it is desired to give a statement in evidence by virtue of this section, a certificate doing any of the following things, that is to say, --

(a) identifying the electronic record containing the statement and describing the manner in which it was produced;

(b) giving such particulars of any device involved in the production of that electronic record as may be appropriate for the purpose of showing that the electronic record was produced by a computer;

(c) dealing with any of the matters to which the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) relate,

and purporting to be signed by a person occupying a responsible official position in relation to the operation of the relevant device or the management of the relevant activities (whichever is appropriate) shall be evidence of any matter stated in the certificate; and for the purposes of this sub-section, it shall be sufficient for a matter to be stated to the best of the knowledge and belief of the person stating it.”

This meansSection 65B(4) requires the production of a certificate that, among other things, identifies the electronic record containing the statement, describes how it was produced, and provides details of the device used to produce the electronic record to demonstrate that the electronic record was produced by a computer, either by a person holding a responsible official position in relation to the case or by a third party.

?

要查看或添加评论,请登录

MAMTA BINANI AND ASSOCIATES的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了