Influencer marketing versus influencer relations – which one is right for your brand?
Trevor Young
Battled-hardened PR, content and digital communications consultant and coach. I help credible entrepreneurs and business professionals raise their profile and reputation in a way that’s strategic and sustainable
Influencer marketing has scooted past fad status and is now well-entrenched in bona fide megatrend territory.
This feels a bit weird to me because the whole notion of getting so-called influencers onside to help promote your brand has been alive and well for, well,? forever! Maybe it feels familiar because dealing with influencers has always been a PR thing and so it’s something that has been ingrained in me for much of my professional career.
But now brand marketers en masse have seen – and are increasingly attracted to – the influencer ‘light’.
Whatever the reason, working with influencers to help get one’s message out into the marketplace continues to be a hot topic of discussion, and rightly so, as it can be a very effective strategy if planned and executed properly.
I see there are two major themes driving the influencer marketing trend:
A supporting reason influencer marketing has become popular with brands is it’s never been easier to identify, and connect with, popular bloggers, Instagrammers , YouTubers , TikTokkers and Snapchatters , with the prevalence of app-based marketplaces (such as Tribe ), talent management agencies (including Viral Nation and Ministry of Talent ) and software platforms and online services such as Tap Influence or Traackr .
So what is influence anyway?
According to the Britannica Dictionary , influence is …
"… the power to change or affect someone or something : the power to cause changes without directly forcing them to happen."
An influencer, therefore, is a person (or thing) that influences , although this definition can be reworked to fit a particular conversation. For example, Tribe states on its website :
"We classify an Influencer as someone with 3000+ genuine followers on just one of our three partner platforms: Facebook, Instagram or Twitter."?
I’m not convinced about Tribe’s definition for reasons I outline shortly. But you can see where this is heading.
Given the marketing profession is typically obsessed about numbers (i.e. reach, ratings, sales etc), it’s totally understandable therefore the number of followers a person has is often the default for ‘influencer’.
Yes, many genuine influencers do have sizeable audiences of engaged fans, followers, advocates, supporters and enthusiasts for their personal brand, for what it is they do and stand for. But just because you have a large following on social media doesn’t necessarily make you an influencer, or indeed, the right influencer for a particular brand or campaign.?
Let’s unpack this:
A key issue I see with influencer marketing is that it tends to be short term, transactional and numbers driven, which is fine, I get it. Numbers give those holding the purse-strings a degree of comfort. Short-term transactional campaigns do have the potential to generate quick wins (i.e. instant sales) if all the right elements are in place.
However, when it comes to working with genuine influencers, I'd prefer the longer-term strategy of building relationships.
Ticking the boxes
For many marketers, the extent of influencer marketing is to identify someone they deem to be an online influencer (and usually this is because they have a large following on social media) – someone who ticks many of the right boxes for the brand – and then enter into a commercial arrangement that sees the influencer posting content online on behalf of the brand.
This strategy can be hit and miss for reasons alluded to above:
领英推荐
Does the influencer genuinely have influence over others?
Are they the right influencer for the brand (and is the ‘fit’ a good one in terms of philosophy, core values etc)?
But it can also work a treat if the influencer really does have an engaged following and gives a plug to a relevant brand they genuinely are passionate about, in a way that’s respectful and not seen as a crass sales pitch; if done in the influencer’s own unique voice, that’s when this type of marketing can be super effective.
Here’s another ‘but’ though.
If your collaboration with an influencer is effective, why stop at a few simple online posts? If the influencer truly does love your brand (or product or whatever) and they genuinely have (potential) clout with their audience, why not turn a one-night stand into something more meaningful?
This is why I prefer influencer ‘relations’ to influencer ‘marketing’. It’s a personal thing, but it might also resonate with you. Here's my reasoning:
Influencer relations is all about identifying those individuals who are noted for their ideas, insights, expertise and the content they produce, within a certain field of endeavour, and who have sway with a particular audience that’s similar to the one you’re targeting from a brand marketing perspective.
The goal then is to build a relationship with this person in a genuine and non-sleazy way.
A few things to remember here:
Is payment ever involved in influencer relations??
As a rule, I’d say “no”, not in the early days when you’re earning the right to connect and build rapport with an individual. But over the journey, there’s absolutely no reason why you wouldn’t enter into a commercial arrangement with an influencer to create content for your organisation, for example e.g. a blog article or whitepaper or ebook, or produce a video for you. I've done this numerous times with my clients (plus I have been on 'the other side', as a content creator).
But again, even this aspect is not always black-and-white.
If your business has a solid communications platform – i.e. a sizeable audience across your blog readership (or large email newsletter subscriber list) and Twitter and LinkedIn accounts; if this audience is one the influencer wants to reach for their own professional purposes – then giving them access to this audience in exchange for content can be a fair deal for both parties.
Thus the key when dealing with influencers is to ensure a fair exchange of value, whether monetary or not. Respect is the name of the game, and it goes both ways.
In summary:
Let’s tell it like it is: If an individual has a large following on, say, Instagram, they are a genuine media channel. To get them to say something nice about your brand – by paying them to do so – is more akin to a media buy with an added layer of credibility if the influencer handles it right, with openness and transparency. If they genuinely have an affinity for your brand or product and this enthusiasm shines through, so much the better.
This to me is what influencer marketing is, or has become, and for some brands this strategy really works, especially those in certain categories in the consumer space e.g. health and fitness, FMCG etc. But for others (business to business companies, for example), some longer term thinking might be required. That’s when influencer relations comes into play.
There is no right or wrong here, it’s what works best for your brand and your business. And hey, no-one ever said you couldn’t do both, but it’s still a good idea to understand the differences and nuances between the two, not to mention the ‘shades of grey’ that sit in between.
Onwards!