Infinera’s Biggest Concern is Ciena

Infinera’s Biggest Concern is Ciena

A commonly heard phrase over the years has been that nobody gets fired for buying from Cisco Systems. When it comes to optical networking products, we have reached the stage in which the same can be said for Ciena, although we believe it has come about despite its top leadership. While both Infinera and its archrival continue to benefit greatly from the US government protection from Chinese competition, which in our opinion is for no legitimate reason, customers are obviously going to think at least twice before buying from the PIC-fixated supplier because once again, its seems that its long-term survival is in doubt.?

As usually the case, listening to one of Infinera’s quarterly earnings calls along with seeing the slides associated with the event, always raises more questions than provides answers. After its latest conference, we have the following 14 inquiries for the top executives at the supplier:

  1. When you are not a full turnkey submarine vendor, why do you imply that Infinera can take advantage of trans-Atlantic routes (as part of its slides?)
  2. Is it possible there is only room for one major player in the undersea upgrade market with Xtera Communications probably on the brink of collapse (as we discussed almost four weeks ago on the fibeReality LinkedIn home page).
  3. Given that your new 1RU box still does not solve the Open Line System (OLS) issue, do you really believe that your band-aid approach in partnering with Lumentum Holdings will be taken seriously by customers?
  4. Why do you defend the indefensible by continuing to assert that the use of your PICs consistently provides a substantial cost savings, and resultant price competitiveness on equipment, when it is not the case with much of the gear being offered?
  5. With all of the development work on your PICs, why are you still producing a 2x50G combination for 100G capability?
  6. Concerning Transmode, in stating,” “We didn’t buy the company to hold market share [in Europe],” why did you not leave it as an independent entity to have a much better shot at accomplishing the task of growing share?
  7. Is it just a coincidence that you only hit 50 percent gross margins right after buying Transmode, and have not done so since, because of the consolidation efforts with your metro product lines?
  8. Before the acquisition, Transmode was doing substantial cost cutting on every one of its products each year – is that still the case?
  9. Why do you insist on...?

To finish reading this article, please click here.



要查看或添加评论,请登录

Mark Lutkowitz的更多文章

  • Infinera Retrospective: Highlighting Present Leadership Strengths

    Infinera Retrospective: Highlighting Present Leadership Strengths

    To demonstrate the dramatic transformation in the corporate management of Infinera, particularly with its metro…

  • Linear Drive Optics Modules: Marketing Tactics in Conflict

    Linear Drive Optics Modules: Marketing Tactics in Conflict

    At OFC 2023, the real buzz should have been about the mounting public support by vendors of the form factor, OSFP-XD…

    7 条评论
  • II-VI Takeout of Broad Duopoly with Lumentum

    II-VI Takeout of Broad Duopoly with Lumentum

    While it could turn out to be a blessing in disguise for Lumentum Holdings down the road, II-VI's actions over the last…

  • 400ZR+ and Arbitrarily Locked-In Narrative

    400ZR+ and Arbitrarily Locked-In Narrative

    Despite the unequivocal remarks on not currently planning to use 400ZR+ or necessarily for that matter, even higher…

    1 条评论
  • Broadcom on CPO/NPO: Countervailing Theories

    Broadcom on CPO/NPO: Countervailing Theories

    Last October, fibeReality wrote an article defending a proposition that Broadcom's big expenditure push for co-packaged…

    3 条评论
  • II-VI vs Lumentum: 3D Sensing Challenge

    II-VI vs Lumentum: 3D Sensing Challenge

    Several days ago, fibeReality wrote an article referring to intelligence we acquired around the middle of last month…

  • Lumentum/NeoPhotonics: Revenue Pressures

    Lumentum/NeoPhotonics: Revenue Pressures

    The implications for the inability of Lumentum to acquire Coherent, despite the financial benefits in failing to do so,…

    1 条评论
  • Quantum Productization Quackery and Exceptions

    Quantum Productization Quackery and Exceptions

    Experimental work on the quantum effect in photonics goes back to 1976 at AT&T-Bell Labs, which resulted in the…

    1 条评论
  • Broadcom's Big Bluff on CPO

    Broadcom's Big Bluff on CPO

    Broadcom has appeared solidly behind its public engagement with co-packaged optics, developing switches with optical…

    1 条评论
  • Our Optical Realizations in Bordeaux

    Our Optical Realizations in Bordeaux

    It was so much fun to speak in person at ECOC 2021 and directly make eye contract with individuals in a live audience…

    6 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了