Infinera Retrospective: Highlighting Present Leadership Strengths

Infinera Retrospective: Highlighting Present Leadership Strengths

To demonstrate the dramatic transformation in the corporate management of Infinera, particularly with its metro business, a fuller summary of fibeReality's articles is in order, after our post recently referring to a 2015 article "on humility." From that time, our pieces demonstrated the past problems involving execution at the supplier. Towards the end of 2017, several months after the arrival of an outsider, David Heard, initially taking on the role of SVP and GM of Products and Solutions, there was the first indication of movement in a positive direction. By the end of 2019, fibeReality became convinced that there was a permanent change for the better, and around a year later, we even saw the possibility for an exit. Hopefully, the details provided in this chronological overview may be useful to the financial crowd, many of whom are apparently having difficulty in making distinctions with the previous leadership, as mentioned during Investor Day this past March. The difference is like night and day.

fibeReality's ten posts from 2016 to 2017, stressed that the past management at Infinera struggled because of inadequate adaptations to commercial realities, along with a rigid marriage to homegrown technology:

  1. January 2016 -- Infinera’s PIC Challenge: On the problem with the vendor's original business plan. “…Going it alone with its PICs…, [as] a disruptive cost factor, initially only resulted in the total interexchange business being cut by as much as a third because of the lack of growth in the space, combined with the other competitors having to match the lower prices to remain competitive.”?
  2. May 2016 -- Infinera’s Last Ditch: Infinity and Beyond: On the firm at that point, “indirectly conceding that there is no potential of getting business from either Verizon or AT&T.”
  3. August 2016 -- Infinera’s Lumentum Band-Aid: “It is hard to imagine how this partnership helps the system vendor very much in that by necessitating a separate box, the density issue is tremendously magnified.”
  4. October 2016 -- Infinera’s Biggest Concern is Ciena: “When your performance is underwhelming, is it appropriate to be laughing, and to be cracking unfunny jokes about investment analysts buying your devices?”
  5. November 2016 -- Top 10 Enigmas at Infinera’s Analyst Day: “Overtaking Ciena, Nokia Alcatel-Lucent, and Huawei does not seem logical.”
  6. March 2017 -- Infinera and the Age of Narcissism: "One of the most disrespectful comments toward the 'Transmode' contingent was made after it had become very noticeable that the TM Series helped to bail out Infinera in the last quarterly results.”
  7. May 2017 -- Infinera Apparently Won’t Neutralize XTM: “That is a far cry from his emphatic comment of integration of the PIC technology onto the TM-Series platform a little over a year ago.”
  8. June 2017 -- Infinera’s Crack at Quasi-Reconstruction: “The rather isolated introduction of the XTM II is a new attempt by Infinera to straddle the line….”?
  9. August 2017 -- Infinera: No Way Out?: “Our own view is that we find it unlikely that any other vendor would be interested in purchasing a company which has a fairly bleak future.”
  10. November 2017 -- Infinera: Actions Speak Louder Than Words: "There was definitely some foreshadowing of this executive shakeup on the part of Infinera’s CEO on the preceding quarterly conference when he evidently finally saw the light and stated, ‘Make no mistake, I have under-executed on our metro strategy based on the TM.’”

In early 2018, fibeReality was inclined to give David Heard the benefit of the doubt when he was still in charge of Product Realization as an SVP and GM. We stated in "Infinera: Doubling Down on Lost Cause, "we would not be surprised if [he]...had advocated a plan, which substantially would have taken the company away from what we would characterize as throwing an assortment of solutions against the wall, and seeing which ones will stick...."

During July, 2018, fibeReality wrote in "Infinera/Coriant: A Survival Gimmick: "It may be a positive sign that David...is definitely front and center this time in promoting this deal..., and that hopefully the company will finally stop playing favorites with just the gear developed in-house." While we acknowledged the "challenge in supporting overlapping products," with such an acquisition, we also mentioned that the supplier's chance for survival was bolstered, and that "Infinera is no longer in the embarrassing position of being absent as an active supplier to the two largest incumbent ISPs in its home market." (Later that year, we discussed the potentially hard choices for users with Infinera's broader base of gear in "Infinera/Coriant: On Capping Installed Base.")

In 2019, fibeReality published, "Infinera: Plausibility for Cautious Optimism" in which we were very impressed by an addition to the board, and started to wonder about a change at the CEO position. The following July, in "Infinera’s “Tellabsation”: Back to the Future," we noted the start of a healthy move away from the obsession with PICs as part of a new narrative. There was only a minor push back in the opposite direction as explained in October 2019, with "Infinera’s XR Optics: “Fat & Happy” Front."

Then in November of 2019, fibeReality was convinced of a permanent, favorable change in the culture of the supplier as expressed in “Infinera: An Unanticipated Destination Point.” Towards the end of 2020, we put out “Infinera: Potential for Exit by Chip Firm Buyout,” in which we anticipated the shift toward a more chip-centric approach.

Within the next two years to the present, Infinera prioritized properly, such as....

To finish reading this article, please click here.


要查看或添加评论,请登录

Mark Lutkowitz的更多文章

  • Linear Drive Optics Modules: Marketing Tactics in Conflict

    Linear Drive Optics Modules: Marketing Tactics in Conflict

    At OFC 2023, the real buzz should have been about the mounting public support by vendors of the form factor, OSFP-XD…

    7 条评论
  • II-VI Takeout of Broad Duopoly with Lumentum

    II-VI Takeout of Broad Duopoly with Lumentum

    While it could turn out to be a blessing in disguise for Lumentum Holdings down the road, II-VI's actions over the last…

  • 400ZR+ and Arbitrarily Locked-In Narrative

    400ZR+ and Arbitrarily Locked-In Narrative

    Despite the unequivocal remarks on not currently planning to use 400ZR+ or necessarily for that matter, even higher…

    1 条评论
  • Broadcom on CPO/NPO: Countervailing Theories

    Broadcom on CPO/NPO: Countervailing Theories

    Last October, fibeReality wrote an article defending a proposition that Broadcom's big expenditure push for co-packaged…

    3 条评论
  • II-VI vs Lumentum: 3D Sensing Challenge

    II-VI vs Lumentum: 3D Sensing Challenge

    Several days ago, fibeReality wrote an article referring to intelligence we acquired around the middle of last month…

  • Lumentum/NeoPhotonics: Revenue Pressures

    Lumentum/NeoPhotonics: Revenue Pressures

    The implications for the inability of Lumentum to acquire Coherent, despite the financial benefits in failing to do so,…

    1 条评论
  • Quantum Productization Quackery and Exceptions

    Quantum Productization Quackery and Exceptions

    Experimental work on the quantum effect in photonics goes back to 1976 at AT&T-Bell Labs, which resulted in the…

    1 条评论
  • Broadcom's Big Bluff on CPO

    Broadcom's Big Bluff on CPO

    Broadcom has appeared solidly behind its public engagement with co-packaged optics, developing switches with optical…

    1 条评论
  • Our Optical Realizations in Bordeaux

    Our Optical Realizations in Bordeaux

    It was so much fun to speak in person at ECOC 2021 and directly make eye contract with individuals in a live audience…

    6 条评论
  • Adtran Plus ADVA Equals Better Buyout Target

    Adtran Plus ADVA Equals Better Buyout Target

    One would struggle to remember a discussion among veterans of the optical equipment space recently contemplating…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了