INEC’s Failures Define the Nigerian General Elections

INEC’s Failures Define the Nigerian General Elections

Last Saturday, Nigerians participated in a hotly contested election process, casting votes for the President and members of the National Assembly.?As we analyzed last week, several issues came to the fore this past weekend, including insecurity, misinformation, and electoral dispute resolution.

A key issue on election day was the absence of security personnel in several polling units. Considering the high levels of insecurity and history of voter suppression across the country, adequate presence of security personnel is non-negotiable for fair and credible elections in Nigeria. The federal government’s failure to properly protect the people in numerous polling units, especially in Lagos and Rivers states, allowed hired political ‘thugs’ to disrupt the voting process. There are multiple first-hand accounts of these disruptors injuring voters, carting away ballot boxes and destroying election materials in several polling units. These disruptors’ suppression efforts also took the form of threats demanding voters not vote for certain candidates. In disappointingly typical fashion, instances of vote buying, and underage voting were also reported in several polling units across the country. ?across the country.

In many polling units, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) encountered significant logistical issues which hampered the voting process. Critical infrastructure such as the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) electronic devices failed to recognize the faces and fingerprints of registered voters. The electoral commission’s failings were not limited to this technological hiccup. INEC officers arrived late at countless polling units, forcing voters to cast their ballots deep into the night. In some places, elections were not even held. INEC has blamed these logistical problems on the current scarcity of fuel and cash across the country.?

However, the major talking point is INEC’s departure from its initial stance and the 2022 Electoral Act stipulation mandating the electronic transmission of election results. According to Section 60, subsection 4 of the Electoral Act:

?“A collation officer or returning officer at an election shall collate and announce the result of an election, subject to his or her verification and confirmation that the— (a) number of accredited voters stated on the collated result are correct and consistent with the number of accredited voters recorded and transmitted directly from polling units under section 47 (2) of this Act; and (b) the votes stated on the collated result are correct and consistent with the votes or results recorded and transmitted directly from polling units under section 60 (4) of this Act”

While the results of the Senate and House of Representatives elections were electronically transferred and uploaded on the INEC Election Result Viewer (IREV) for many polling units, the electoral commission eschewed real-time transmission of the Presidential results, instead reverting to manual transmission. INEC claimed that “technical issues” with its server necessitated this reversion. This is in spite of the fact that the commission was given the funds (305 billion Naira) it requested to ensure that electronic transmission was a reality per the Electoral Act. A knock-on effect of this manual transmission was a delay in the collation of results; INEC commenced collation over 24 hours after voting occurred. Put together, the electoral commission’s handling of the process has unsurprisingly heightened public concern about the transparency of INEC and the announced results. ?

The All Progressives Congress’ Bola Tinubu has been announced as the President-elect and the victor of this process. Given the range of problems, it’s likely that this result will be contested by the other major parties and disputed by a significant share of the public. In fact, the People’s Democratic Party, Labour Party and New Nigeria People’s Party have already called on INEC to cancel the results and hold fresh elections. That’s a demand that will most likely not be met, leaving the convoluted electoral dispute resolution process at the Courts as their only real recourse.

What policy and insight do you seek? ?

Whether you are a government official, civil society organization, or researcher, our repository provides comprehensive access to public policies, regulations, and guidelines across Africa. We provide insights and intelligence on these regional policies and regulations for research, advocacy, policymaking, and investing. ?

Get in touch with us here: <mailto:[email protected]>.???

No alt text provided for this image

In the News ?

We're also tracking the latest current events in the news, and how they may affect the decisions of policymakers. Below are some of the latest developments.?

Democracy & Governance | UN launches initiative for Libya 2023 elections. The UN envoy for Libya announced his plans to launch a new initiative aimed at enabling presidential and legislative elections in the country, this year. The proposed initiative will bring together all relevant Libyan stakeholders, including representatives of political institutions, other political and tribal leaders, civil society groups, security officials and others.

Governance | Mali's revised draft constitution bolsters the president's power. The proposed new Constitution is key to a new reform project initiated by the military government to ensure a return to civilian rule through an election scheduled to be held in February 2024. The new constitution provides the president with power to appoint and fire the prime minister and government ministers and dissolve the National Assembly. In addition, the new draft calls for there to be no time limit on the prosecution of potential coup plotters.

Foreign Affairs | Mali and Burkina Faso reaffirmed their commitment to a strong and lasting alliance. Leaders of both countries met earlier this week to discuss security issues, humanitarian aid, health, regional cooperation, and sanctions. Both countries' leaders criticized the Economic Community of West African States’ (ECOWAS) decision to maintain and tighten sanctions against their countries, despite their pleas. The meeting ended with the two countries signing an agreement to cooperate in the fight again terrorism which plagues their countries.

Trade | South Africa and Uganda signed bilateral and economic agreements in various sectors including tourism, transport and agriculture. On Tuesday, Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni during a state visit to South Africa emphasized the importance of intracontinental trade. Currently, Uganda is South Africa’s 15th-largest trading partner in Africa and the second-largest in East Africa. In his remarks, he encouraged better economic ties between both countries. Among some of the priorities discussed was the procurement of coal from South Africa to transform Uganda’s high-grade iron ore into steel.

Want more? Check some of our recently published insights, which provide you with deeper analysis and context at the intersection of public policy and current events.

Looking Forward to Nigeria’s General Elections: What are the Big Issues?

Electoral Violence: A Threat to Safe & Credible Elections in 2023?

A New Approach to Addressing Nigeria’s Malnutrition Challenge??

Nigeria’s 2023 Elections: policy options to address voter apathy???

Africa Priorities and the New U.S. Strategy for Sub-Saharan Africa????

Ruto’s Time, What Should Kenyans Expect????

2023 National Elections: What can we learn from Osun and Ekiti’s elections??????

African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) Agreement: The Next Big Thing?????

Political Parties, Presidential Candidates, and the Electoral Act 2022???

Don't forget to check out our new website!

We've recently launched a complete redesign of the Policy Vault website, and we want YOU to tell us what you think:?www.policyvault.africa

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Policy Vault的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了