"Indiscriminately Agile"?

"Indiscriminately Agile"

Before anything other, I've given in and joined Substack. You can find me and a bunch of exclusive videos and writings at duena.substack.com and this article has its juicy bits continued on there if you care to have more behind-the-scenes-meat on the DevOps goss bone.

-------------------------------------------------

I was (virtually) shown around a tech org last week and found myself saying: “It’s pretty awesome to see organisations like yours who do all the right things

Amused CTO “Do we?

Yeah I was impressed how little resistance you have towards all ceremonies and the principles of Agile

Oh I see, well if I’m honest, I don’t know if I would have taken them down that route

How do you mean? What other route is there nowadays in making software?”

“Oh, there are plenty. At the end of the day, this Agile thing just goes through phases of trendiness and in our particular enterprise it was already in place when I took over or I would have rather had us birth our own Fragile

Said CTO knows I am going to anonymously quote him today. He answered my question with “Totally, I can’t be the only one feeling this way”. At first, I was up in arms. Here’s a real-life tech leader who is telling me straight up that he’s not a fan of agility. Insanely risky stance in this day and age, right?

Maybe not.?Now don’t get me wrong, if his point would have been that he wanted an organisation that was 100% waterfall with armies of Prince certification owners reinforcing command and control and sequential thinking and technology creation then yes, that would have indeed been crazy. Or if he had some form of a blanket statement to justify some deep-seated hatred of Agile. But he meant neither, he meant he wishes he would’ve forged his own road.?

I only realised that’s the case when I asked why he hadn’t pushed for his own model.?

They weren’t there, too new to Agile. To help me forge the best hybrid to fit our particular road we all would have had to have been at the same level of understanding of the principles while also being savvy and cunning about both immediate and longer-term business needs.”?

“Are you saying they’re “Too Agile?” I asked?

Ha! No, no such thing. Maybe we are “Indiscriminately Agile” and what do you call it? Not “from the heart”?

In a sense, I can absolutely see it. Anyone who has not been able to reach a genuine mentality change towards non-sequential decoupled thinking, rapid iteration and a thirst for experimentation and speed of execution will simply be “doing Agile by numbers’ and going through the motions without the internal impetus and they are in no shape to be critical about either the philosophy or the process to understand how to apply it to their specific situation.?

By contrast, if the tech organisation was composed of seasoned agilists then being creative within the confines of the theoretical tenants of the ideology would have been much easier.?

I asked what he was doing about it. He said “first and foremost work on raising people’s confidence and self-esteem and their team’s psychological safety”. Why? “So that they learn to trust their instincts and judgement again and to offer considered and alternative points of view even if they go against the grain. Once they get there they’ll ask me about our own fragile/hybrid themselves one day soon and then we can build sustainably.”?

Indeed. A simple but powerful reminder: we can’t ever build sustainably in the absence of the safety and passion foundations. It’s only when the team’s and the organisation’s minds and hearts all align and all passionately row in the same direction that any success can be expected.?

——————————————————————

<This article was originally published on the www. duenablomstrom.com website?here>

At?PeopleNotTech?we make?software?that measures and improves the well-being and Psychological Safety of teams, come see a DEMO.

“Nothing other than sustained, habitual, EQed people work at the team level aka “the human work” done BY THE TEAM will improve any organisation’s level of Psychological Safety and therefore drop their levels of HumanDebt?.”

To order the "People Before Tech: The Importance of Psychological Safety and Teamwork in the Digital Age" book go to this Amazon?link

Ron Person

Information Technology and Services Professional

1 年

I believe and agree with you. Well stated and your message should be well received. The results ultimately are better when them is a synergy of varied talents contributing towards a goal that the collective team or entities become indistinguishable from the entity or product they are collectively manifesting.

回复
Dr. Ashish Manohar (For Values with TEDx Sustainable Dreams)

Gratitude towards 528.432786 Million humans of 205 Nations who Liked the Idea of Solution Master, to Achieve Sustainable Goals on Mother Earth and on Moon, Mars & Beyond, wherever humans as supreme beings live in future.

1 年

#DigitalLesson #CEOLesson #LifeLesson #SDGLesson 11261 via Duena Blomstrom

It’s only when... ALL ...minds and hearts all align and all passionately row in the same direction - Sorry, but that seems impossible, and I think it is always important to have different points of view that are contrary to the group elevated... that is how progress is made... There is no one solution that applies to all problems... and thinking outside the box is where most real innovations come from...

So would we include MBSE as an agile practice?

回复
CHESTER SWANSON SR.

Realtor Associate @ Next Trend Realty LLC | HAR REALTOR, IRS Tax Preparer

1 年

Well said.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Duena Blomstrom的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了