India's move to implement a citizenship law excluding Muslims has triggered debate and raised questions about inclusivity and discrimination.

India's recent announcement to implement the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), excluding Muslims, has stirred debate and drawn attention ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's bid for a third term in office. The CAA offers a fast track to citizenship for religious minorities from neighboring countries, but notably excludes Muslims, prompting concerns about discrimination and religious polarization.

Enacted in 2019, the CAA has been controversial since its inception, with protests erupting across the country over fears of undermining India's secular foundation. Critics argue that the law, combined with proposed citizenship verification measures, could marginalize Muslims and legitimize discrimination based on religion.

While the government defends the CAA as a humanitarian gesture, human rights organizations, and opposition parties have raised objections, questioning its timing and implications for India's diverse society. Amnesty India has labeled the law as "discriminatory" and against the principles of equality and human rights.

India's Muslim population, constituting a significant minority, has faced increasing scrutiny and attacks in recent years. Critics accuse Modi's government of fostering an environment conducive to anti-Muslim violence through its policies and silence on the issue.

Modi's blend of religion and politics, exemplified by the inauguration of a Hindu temple at a controversial site, has resonated with Hindu voters but raised concerns about secularism and minority rights. As India gears up for upcoming elections, the implementation of the CAA remains a contentious issue, reflecting broader debates about identity, inclusivity, and democracy in the world's largest democracy.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government announced rules to implement a 2019 citizenship law that excludes Muslims, weeks before the Hindu nationalist leader seeks a third term in office.

The Citizenship Amendment Act provides a fast track to naturalization for Hindus, Parsis, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, and Christians who fled to Hindu-majority India from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan before Dec. 31, 2014. The law excludes Muslims, who are a majority in all three nations.

The law was approved by the Indian Parliament in 2019, but Modi’s government held off with its implementation after deadly protests broke out in the capital New Delhi, and elsewhere. Scores were killed during days of clashes.

The nationwide protests in 2019 drew people of all faiths who said the law undermines India’s foundation as a secular nation. Muslims were particularly worried that the government could use the law, combined with a proposed national register of citizens, to marginalize them.

The National Register of Citizens is part of the Modi government’s effort to identify and weed out people it claims came to India illegally. The register has only been implemented in the northeastern state of Assam, and the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party has promised to roll out a similar citizenship verification program nationwide.

Modi’s government has defended the 2019 citizenship law as a humanitarian gesture. It argues that the law is meant only to extend citizenship to religious minorities fleeing persecution and would not be used against Indian citizens.

“These rules will now enable minorities persecuted on religious grounds in Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan to acquire citizenship in our nation,” Home Minister Amit Shah wrote on X, formerly Twitter.

India’s main opposition Congress party questioned the announcement: "The timing right before the elections is designed to polarise the elections.”

Human rights watchdog Amnesty India in a statement called the law “discriminatory” and said it “goes against the constitutional values of equality and international human rights law.” It said the law “legitimizes discrimination based on religion” and is “exclusionary in its structure and intent.”

India is home to 200 million Muslims who make up a large minority group in the country of more than 1.4 billion people. They are scattered across almost every part of India and have been targeted in a series of attacks that have taken place since Modi first assumed power in 2014.

Critics say Modi’s conspicuous silence over anti-Muslim violence has emboldened some of his most extreme supporters and enabled more hate speech against Muslims.

Modi has increasingly mixed religion with politics in a formula that has resonated deeply with India’s majority Hindu population. In January, he opened a Hindu temple at the site of a demolished mosque in northern Ayodhya city, fulfilling his party’s long-held Hindu nationalist pledge.

Most poll surveys suggest Modi will win a majority in a general election that is scheduled to be held by May.

At the heart of the controversy lies the question of who belongs in India and who deserves citizenship. Supporters of the law argue that it provides refuge to persecuted religious minorities, such as Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists, Jains, and Parsis, fleeing persecution in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh. They contend that the law is a humanitarian gesture, offering protection to vulnerable communities facing religious persecution.

However, critics view the law through a different lens, seeing it as a deliberate attempt to marginalize Muslims and redefine India's secular identity. They argue that by explicitly excluding Muslims, the law undermines the secular fabric of the country and contravenes the principles of equality enshrined in the Indian Constitution. Critics also express concerns about the potential for statelessness and the disenfranchisement of millions of Muslim residents who may not be able to provide documentation to prove their citizenship.

The implementation of the citizenship law has sparked nationwide protests, with demonstrators taking to the streets to voice their dissent and demand its repeal. These protests have been met with both support and criticism, reflecting the deep divisions within Indian society on issues of identity, religion, and citizenship.

In response to the protests, the Indian government has defended the law as a necessary measure to protect persecuted minorities and uphold India's humanitarian tradition. However, critics continue to call for its repeal, arguing that it violates the principles of equality and secularism enshrined in the Indian Constitution.

As the debate over India's citizenship law continues to unfold, it underscores the complex interplay between identity, inclusivity, and democracy in one of the world's largest and most diverse nations. The outcome of this debate will not only shape the future of citizenship and religious freedom in India but also have broader implications for democracy and human rights around the world.

Resources from AP

Credit: ?SHEIKH SAALIQ

Warm regards,

Sahil Reshi