The Index Card Test of Strategy

The Index Card Test of Strategy

A few months ago, I gave a talk about Strategic FUEL to the staff of a nonprofit organization. After hearing the framework, one of the leaders asked, “How do you know if your strategy is focused?”

The technical answer concerns (a) whether the strategy directly addresses the most important opportunities and challenges the organization faces, and (b) whether it realistically accounts for the team’s capacity to do new things. Both criteria are almost too obvious to state, but I’ve seen too many strategies that don’t fit those criteria!

All that said, there is a rudimentary way of answering the question: The Index Card Test.?

You give each team member an index card and ask them to write down what they think the strategy is. If their answers don’t fit on a single side of the index card, there’s a good chance your team’s strategy is not focused.

The Index Card Test is also a good measure of whether your team’s strategy is understandable and embedded in routines. If the strategy is referenced in the organization’s day-to-day operations, it is much more likely that the strategy will be top of mind for everyone, and that they will use the strategy to drive their work. In contrast, if the strategy is not embedded or understandable, you will see that reflected in team members having different answers or using the same words but with different meanings.

Try it out with your team. If yours is like most teams I’ve done this exercise with, you’ll be surprised by the answers! Of course, the Index Card Test doesn’t fully diagnose whether a strategy is focused, or whether it’s even the right strategy. But what’s valuable about the standard is that the small size of the index card forces a reckoning with what’s most important and what you are willing to sacrifice for those things.

In Strategic FUEL for Nonprofits, I describe eight standards for focused strategy, but perhaps the most important ones are:

  • The organization has identified programs or services, customer segments, and activities that fall outside of the vision and is willing to sacrifice them to focus on the most critical areas.
  • The organization has identified capabilities where it is willing to be mediocre or even weak in order to concentrate attention and resources on the most important capabilities.

When I see teams developing strategies, their unwillingness to surface and make these choices is the primary cause of bloated, less focused strategies, which are more challenging to implement.

If you try this exercise, please let me know how it goes.

There’s a saying that If everything is important, nothing is important.

In my experience, the better line is: If everything is important, nothing will get done.


Something Fun

This weekend, I traveled to Ann Arbor to see Michigan play Texas. It was a tough loss, but hey, you get to be national champions all season.?

The trip’s highlight was hanging out backstage at Fox’s Big Noon Kickoff broadcast outside of Michigan Stadium, which enabled us to meet the cast and many of the guests, including Fab Five member Chris Webber. (My college roommate, Jon Morosi, is a baseball reporter for Fox Sports and made it happen.)?

My favorite was Michigan legend, Heisman Trophy winner, and pro football hall of famer Charles Woodson. Our conversation falls under the Worldwide Club of Charles secrecy pact, but in the picture below, Woodson is communicating his respect for our equivalent levels of athleticism and career achievement.


Thanks for reading!

Charles



Get Monday Musings in Your Inbox

I publish this blog series each Monday. Like this one, it’ll contain something useful and something fun to start your week. If you want to receive Monday Musings in your inbox, subscribe here!


要查看或添加评论,请登录

Charles Moore的更多文章

  • Valuing Multiple Realities

    Valuing Multiple Realities

    An Idea for Consideration On Friday afternoon, I received this text message alert from the DC police department: “MPD…

  • You Already Know Enough to Act

    You Already Know Enough to Act

    An Idea for Consideration Last week, I attended a dinner with a group of executives. The conversation turned to what…

    1 条评论
  • Is It an Asteroid or Meteor?

    Is It an Asteroid or Meteor?

    An Idea for Consideration What’s the difference between an asteroid and a meteor? I asked myself that question this…

  • Normalizing (the Right Kind of) Experimentation

    Normalizing (the Right Kind of) Experimentation

    An Idea for Consideration Last week, I wrote about the power of resets. At the end of the post, I mentioned that a…

    1 条评论
  • The Power of a Reset

    The Power of a Reset

    An Idea for Consideration Last week, I talked about how I had been preparing for the move and staging our new house for…

    1 条评论
  • Moving & Experimentation

    Moving & Experimentation

    On Friday, my wife and I bought a new house. In many ways, this was accidental.

    1 条评论
  • Creating Dissatisfaction with the Status Quo

    Creating Dissatisfaction with the Status Quo

    An Idea for Consideration I co-lead a course on leading change at Georgetown’s Center for Nonprofit Leadership. I…

  • Competitive Child Rearing and the Exhausting Life

    Competitive Child Rearing and the Exhausting Life

    For the past couple of months, I’ve made it a habit to ask friends with adult children for their reflections on…

    2 条评论
  • Experimenting with the Sabbath

    Experimenting with the Sabbath

    “Remember to observe the Sabbath day by keeping it holy. Six days a week are set apart for your daily duties and…

    1 条评论
  • The Get-To : Have-To Ratio

    The Get-To : Have-To Ratio

    An Idea for Consideration In last week’s post, I argued that work-life balance challenges result from a lopsided ratio…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了