Including

Including

We always need to include even those that we've dismissed as not needing it. This newsletter first appeared on the Duha One substack.

A Moment for Memory

Before I get into today’s newsletter, I want to take a moment to reflect on the past year. It’s been 366 days since the most horrific day for Jews since the Holocaust: when Hamas terrorists raped and butchered Israelis, killing 1,195 and abducting 251, including a baby. Many of those remain hostages even today, some with little or no sign of life in the past year. Let us take a moment to reflect, to remember those who have passed, and hope and pray that the remaining hostages come home safely.

Leadership Moment: DEI-abolical Training

Freshman Shoshana Aufzein writes about Columbia/Barnard’s mandatory DEI training. It’s a frankly unsurprising record of what passes these days for HR training in many organizations, although the unique circumstances at Columbia, where Jews are regularly confronted by terrorist symbology and language, may make it a little more surprising to hear an official contractor of the university communicating antisemitic tropes.

But it shouldn’t be surprising. As Inclusion programs morphed from focusing on environments – how do we make everyone feel more welcome? – to an equity/outcome focus – how do we advance these specific groups – it was obvious that this was the outcome ahead of us. A identity-based focus on Under Represented Minorities (URMs) carries a clear connotation that a problem to be solved must be … over-represented minorities.

There are many societal and structural inputs that contribute to inequitable outcomes, but tackling those requires hard work. Easier for organizations to tackle – and for DEI “experts” to profit from – is an assumption that any group that does “better” than average is the beneficiary of oppression (and therefore fair game for all blame), and that any group that does “worse” is the victim of oppression (and to be a fair target for short-term positive discrimination). These assumptions underly much of modern DEI through, from the intersectionality of identity to the oppressor/oppressed language.

We will get to see how Columbia & Barnard address this problem … if they do at all.

Appearances

Recent

Sep 24: Video interview with David Spark about 1% Leadership

Sep 24: HOU.SEC.CON (Houston). Slides and recorded talk

Sep 26: Fundamental AppSec questions, with Daniel Shechter, Miggo.

Upcoming

Oct 9: ASPM Nation (virtual)

One Minute Pro Tip: Stop Using Exclusive Inclusive Language

A lot of language commonly in use in organizations has strong negative externalities. Take “diverse” as an example. I often see calls for “a diverse speaker” or calling for a “diverse candidate.” Diverse is an adjective that applies to groups: a diverse group has representation from a lot of distinct subgroups. An individual is not diverse. This is often code for “women, or specific minority groups.” Using diverse to mean this is problematic language for anyone not in those groups. If you have a panel with all white men, it’s fine to say “I need a speaker who isn’t another white man” without misusing the word diverse.

Similarly, be cautious about using the phrase under-represented minorities, which carries the implication that some minorities are over-represented (and should be reduced).


This newsletter first appeared on the Duha One substack.

One of the saddest days of my life was the day that my mother - a holocaust survivor - told me she is now afraid to put the Star of David out with her Christmas displays (after decades of doing so) in a large US city that has several universities. While I've been fortunate not to face it at work, it is frustrating, to say the least.

Aimee Savran ???

Sr. Campaigns and Content Marketing Manager

5 个月

Andy thank you for this. Your wisdom means a lot to me and your perspective gives me hope for our people and the world in general. Am Yisrael Chai! ??

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Andy Ellis的更多文章

  • Leadership's Trolley Problem: Choices and Consequences

    Leadership's Trolley Problem: Choices and Consequences

    Balancing Accountability and Compassion in Moments of Crisis. This newsletter first appeared on the Duha One substack.

    4 条评论
  • Leaping from one horse to another

    Leaping from one horse to another

    Although it’d be relevant today to talk about national leaders, perhaps we can learn lessons from slightly smaller…

  • Cross-Pollination

    Cross-Pollination

    Taking lessons from one environment to another can be dangerous..

    1 条评论
  • An Inclusion Armistice

    An Inclusion Armistice

    How do we celebrate diverse perspectives without needing to denigrate one? This newsletter first appeared on the…

    4 条评论
  • Electing to Practice the Future

    Electing to Practice the Future

    It's easy to just respond in the moment — but think about how your choices might affect the future. This post first…

    3 条评论
  • Speak First, Even If You Carry A Big Stick

    Speak First, Even If You Carry A Big Stick

    The earlier your words come into play, the more you can shape the encounter. This post first appeared in the Duha One…

    2 条评论
  • Managing the End of The Year

    Managing the End of The Year

    The end of the year feels like a crisis, with too much happening in constrained time. Don't add micromanagement hassles…

    3 条评论
  • The Perversity of Incentives

    The Perversity of Incentives

    How do you make sure you aren't creating adversaries out of your stakeholders with bad policies? This newsletter first…

    2 条评论
  • Get out of your team's way

    Get out of your team's way

    Great leaders put their team in place to succeed ..

    3 条评论
  • Names are models

    Names are models

    How you name something can change the mental model of your listener. This newsletter first appeared on the Duha One…

    3 条评论