Inaugural LinkedIn Edition: 12 ways to free cities from cars; climate infighting; climate action gets GLAM

Inaugural LinkedIn Edition: 12 ways to free cities from cars; climate infighting; climate action gets GLAM

Welcome to Team Climate, LinkedIn peeps!

Hi friends! I’m really glad you’re here.

I'm Kim Nicholas, professor of sustainability science at Lund University in Sweden.

This is my actionable, evidence-based climate newsletter, We Can Fix It, where each month you get a healthy dose of facts, feelings, and action for facing and healing the climate crisis.

A quick intro, if we haven't met:

In my research and teaching, I build the evidence base for how to make a fast and fair transition to a fossil-free world where people and nature thrive. This is also what I speak about in about 75 talks a year, and what I write about for publications like?Elle,?The Guardian,?Scientific American,?and?New Scientist, and in my bestselling book, UNDER THE SKY WE?MAKE: How to be Human in a Warming?World. I'm orginally from Sonoma, California, where I studied wine and climate change for my PhD at Stanford.

I started this newsletter in January 2021 over on Substack, and am so encouraged by the responses I get from people all over the world.

While I've previously shared posts with newsletter updates on LinkedIn and linked over to the full text on Substack, with my friend Nate's encouragement (hi Nate!), this month I'm trying an experiment to post the same newsletter natively on LinkedIn. I'm curious how this will work, and would be happy to hear your thoughts on what format you find easiest to read, engage with, and share.

You can catch up on what you've missed so far in the We Can Fix It archive, like Your Top 5 Climate Superpowers, The Only Time Buying New Is Better for Climate, and System Change is a Circle, Not a Waterfall.

On to the facts, feels and action!?

Facts: 12 ways to free cities from cars?

As a We Can Fix It reader, you know that, for the average household in North America or Europe,?cars are the biggest climate polluter.?

But good news! Dozens of cities have already put in place measures that worked to demonstrably reduce cars and support sustainable mobility, creating more space and cleaner air for people.?

In a?study?led by the wonderful?Paula Kuss?(developed out of her?masters’ thesis!), from screening nearly 800 cases, we identified 12 ways that have *already worked* to reduce cars in cities.?

Here are the 12 measures, ranked by effectiveness, in artistic format! (It would make a great coffee mug, don’t you think??)?

No alt text provided for this image

Image: A dozen effective measures to reduce car use in cities. Thanks to Emma Li Johansson for the illustration! Featured in?The Conversation.

And here are the 12 measures in wonk-friendly table format!?

No alt text provided for this image

A dozen effective measures to reduce car use in cities. Table from my article in?The Conversation.

Key takeaway 1: Effective measures combine sticks and carrots.?

You already know that?getting people to drive less?is what’s needed to reduce emissions, and??carrots alone don’t work?to get people out of cars.?


Our analysis shows that?effective measures need to address driving and parking reduction and restriction as an explicit goal?(the red “sticks” column above)— and then?use the space freed and the money generated to expand and improve walking, biking, and public transport?(the green “carrot” column above).?


Many people on Twitter said, “You forgot bike lanes!”?

No, I didn’t. They’re part of #2, 6, and 7, for example. It’s just that bike lanes ALONE weren’t found effective to reduce cars. Carrots AND sticks.?

Key takeaway 2: Local city government must lead.

We found 75% of the effective measures were led by local government, often in collaboration with employers, universities, or transport providers.?

But! We know?politicians don’t hear enough from their constituents?supporting bold climate policies.?

So: please go right ahead and forward this email to your local city leaders, and ask them to implement evidence-based car reduction policies.?

Don’t forget your favourite:

  • mayor

  • city council members

  • city and transportation planners

  • cycling, walking, and sustainable mobility groups

You can also tag your leaders in my posts about this research on?Twitter,?LinkedIn, or?Instagram. Or share our piece in?The Guardian?on the measures and the cities that have put them into practice. :)

And if you’re hungry for even MORE, read what my editor called “an evidence-based rant against cars” for?The Conversation, where I explain why:?

  • electric cars don’t solve the problems of cars?

  • cars today exacerbate social inequalities?

  • focusing explicitly on reducing cars, not only increasing sustainable mobility, is necessary?

  • governments should stop subsidising cars and driving?

  • policies have to change to overcome the playing field now tilted towards cars

Excited to hear how you use these measures to make your city better!?

Feelings: Squirming Over Infighting?

Here’s a feeling Climate People don’t talk about much: discomfort, distress, or worse over internal group dynamics where people who share a goal of a fast and fair transition to a fossil-free world fight with each other. Eeeeek.?

Of course, we need to get the facts straight, and robust discussion about strategies are welcome. Of course, it’s important to listen with humility to people operating from good faith.?

But I’ve been noticing a big uptick in infighting, blame, and defensiveness on Climate Twitter, and it really bums me out. A circular firing squad doesn’t seem like the way to build the world I want to live in. It also takes time and energy away from the actual work we need: dismantling the systems of power that lock in exploitation, and rebuilding them towards regeneration.?

My armchair analysis is that everyone is overstretched personally, and climate scientists are exhausted from screaming into the void for decades, and things in the world are not going well, and people are lashing out at each other. Which is understandable, but not great.

It makes me wonder: What would lead to more generative and fruitful conversations? How can Climate People express concerns, doubts, worries, or observations in a way that leads to support, reflection, and mutual learning, rather than personal judgment, defensiveness, or criticism? Is the nature of social media exacerbating this problem? What kind of forum or platform would let people exchange ideas more constructively??


I don’t have the answers to these questions, but I would love to hear what you think in the comments below!?

Action: Team Climate gets GLAM (Galleries, Libraries, Archives, and Museums)!

You know who is fired up about climate action? Museums!!?

I heard a lot of great ideas at the?Spring Meeting of Swedish Museums?this week. The whole meeting was themed around the role museums can play in the climate crisis. (Can you get your next professional conference to adopt a climate theme??)

If you work in the arts, culture, with museums, or visit museums, take some inspiration from the points below!?

And if not— how can you adapt these ideas to your sector???

Museums for Future?

Matilda Eriksson of Museums for Future?gave a fabulous talk where she invited museums to ask themselves how they can serve society in the climate crisis. (A good question for all of us!!)

She shared four points from the?Declaration of Museums for Future:?

1. Support climate strikes?

Matilda offered reassurance of nonviolence and solidarity, and suggested museums start by asking youth climate activists “How can we support each other with our unique talents and resources?” (Again, great climate convo starter generally.)?

No alt text provided for this image

Image Source:?Museums for Future

2. Communicate to the public?

Museums can use their collections to draw attention to the climate crisis, including by putting #ObjectsOnStrike or pointing out problematic ties with fossil fuels.?


3. Transform our institutions to be part of the solution

Museums can focus on their own operations, both practically in terms of eliminating emissions, and how they work to support a fast and fair transition.?

4. Raise awareness in our networks

Our relationships are powerful. Museums for Future urged museums to “use our voices to spread awareness about the necessity of immediate climate actions” among museums, employees, management, and decision-makers.?

How can you adapt these four points for your sector??

Making Culture Regenerative— Bridget McKenzie?

Bridget McKenzie?of?Climate Museums UK?gave an inspiring talk. She suggests:?

No alt text provided for this image

Source: Culture Takes Action:?Pathways by Bridget McKenzie.

From the United Nations to Your Museum?

Henry McGhie of Curating Tomorrow?has an excellent series of?free guides, like?Action for Climate Empowerment, that translate the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals into suggestions for what galleries, libraries, archives and museums (GLAM!) can do:?

  • as a sector,

  • at particular institutions,?

  • and as individual workers,?

  • with suggested metrics.?

It’s super practical and clear. I would love to see more guides like this for every sector!?

Awareness through Art

Matilda Eriksson?shared a powerful collaboration between?WWF and Museo del Prado, to digitally alter paintings from the collection to draw attention to climate impacts in billboards across Madrid.?

No alt text provided for this image

Image: El paso de la laguna Estigia (Landscape with Charon Crossing the Styx), Museo Del Prado. Source:?BBC

No alt text provided for this image

Image: Painting modified by Museo Del Prado/WWF. Source:?BBC

Gut punch, right??

What examples of climate art have you seen? Please share in the comments below!?

Parting Tidbits

Listen: I spoke to Carlton Reid on The Spokesmen podcast on why climate scientists are getting desperate (5:00), why building great bike lanes isn't the solution to reducing cars (13:50), how to make car reduction politically palatable (29:45, 38:20), & why all cars need to be fossil-free but the best car is... a bicycle (51:20, 46:00). Enjoy!?

Read: A book I got to read last year and blurb is finally out, and it’s so good!?Return to Nature,?by Emma Loewe, is an antidote to burnout and a gentle invitation to expansive possibilities for awe, restoration, and gratitude right outside your front door, through accessible rituals, simple mindset shifts, and solid practical advice on how we can better care for nature in our everyday lives as consumers and citizens.?

Take care friends! Get outside and enjoy April. Tulips are blooming here in Lund!?

xo,?

Kim?

Priscilla ("Sally") Mattison

Of Counsel at Bernard M. Resnick, Esq., P.C.

2 年

I love the newsletter, Kim, but I'd rather keep getting it as an email.

回复
Kim Locke

Applied Scientist, Earth Science, SAIC

2 年

Wow, love this post Kim, and can’t wait to read your next newsletter. Especially interested in trying to practice your ideas for more positive dialogue and engaging with the creative for change. And the #carfree rant. Copenhagen was the only bike-friendly city I’ve ever lived in.

Sammy Davies

Sustainability Programs Manager | Compost & Soil Regeneration | MBA Candidate in Sustainable Innovation

2 年

Justin Faiola I think you'd be interested :)

Ma?gosia Halliop

Educational Content Writer | Freelance Non-Fiction Editor | Environmental Educator & Communicator

2 年

Thanks for raising the topic of climate infighting. I wonder if this is more an issue for many of us than outright denial--I know it is for me, even in daily conversations with family and friends. Focusing on shared vision has helped me in those conversations. One thing I like about the email newsletter format is that it opens in a new tab and I can leave it open for a while and return to it. But it's true that inboxes get cluttered so it's also great to see it here. I think if you can do both for greater reach, do both! There's so much good stuff in your newsletter.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Kimberly Nicholas的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了