Are In-Office Policies Sabotaging Gender Equality?
Dr. Gleb Tsipursky
Named "Office Whisperer" by The New York Times for helping leaders overcome frustrations with hybrid work and Generative AI | 7X Best-selling Author | HBR, Fortune, Forbes, Inc. | Behavioral scientist | Proud Ukrainian
Too few leaders are paying attention to a critical issue: the disproportionate impact of rigid RTO policies on women. Forced RTO not only threatens the strides made toward gender equality but also risks pushing women out of the workforce, exacerbating existing inequalities.?
Why a Forced Return to Office is a Gender Equality Issue
Upwork's research reveals that nearly two-thirds (63%) of C-suite leaders acknowledge that RTO mandates have led to a disproportionate number of women quitting. Additionally, more than half of the surveyed executives admitted struggling to fill these vacant roles, with many acknowledging that the loss of female employees has negatively impacted company productivity.
A mandatory return to the office disproportionately affects women, especially those with caregiving responsibilities. Deloitte and Workplace Intelligence highlighted that leaders with caregiving responsibilities are 30% more likely to exit if remote work options are rescinded - and unfortunately, women bear more of the caregiving responsibilities. The flexibility afforded by remote work during the pandemic allowed women to take on high-paying, high-pressure roles, narrowing the gender pay gap. The reversal of RTO policies naturally reverses these gains, pushing women out of the workforce or into less demanding roles that offer limited career progression.
Similarly, a recent survey by Nash Squared found that organizations mandating employees to be in the office at least four days a week had a significantly lower rate of hiring women, comprising just one in five new hires. In contrast, firms with more flexible work arrangements saw a 50% higher hiring rate for women.
The lack of flexibility forces women to choose between career advancement and personal responsibilities, a choice that disproportionately impacts their career progression. Flexible work environments offer a semblance of balance, allowing women to integrate their professional and personal lives more effectively. Without this flexibility, women are more likely to opt out of full-time roles or sidestep promotional opportunities that demand more in-office presence.
The Gender Pay Gap: A Precarious Progress for Gender Equality
The gender pay gap has been a longstanding issue, and recent advancements in flexible working environments during the pandemic have provided a glimmer of hope. Consider the McKinsey & Company and LeanIn.Org Women in the Workplace report, which spans 27,000 employees, 270 senior HR leaders, and 270 companies, thus providing a strong basis for comparison. The study shows that women now constitute 28% of the C-suite—a historic peak. However, this progress is tenuous, with women of color representing a mere 6% of top-level leadership. The journey to this milestone has been arduous, and forced RTO policies risk unraveling these gains.
The mid-tier promotion disparity further highlights the systemic obstacles women face. For every 100 men promoted from entry-level to managerial positions, only 87 women achieve the same elevation. This number drops to 73 for women of color. Microaggressions also play a significant role in derailing women's careers, with women 1.5 times more likely than men to have a colleague take credit for their work and twice as likely to endure unsolicited comments about their emotional state. These experiences lead many women to contemplate leaving their jobs, further exacerbating gender disparities.
The importance of flexible work arrangements is particularly evident for women returning to the workforce after career breaks. Organizations like Women Returners, which supports women re-entering the workforce, highlight how remote and hybrid work models have revolutionized opportunities for career returners. Julianne Miles, who runs the organization, notes that these flexible working models have been instrumental in helping women with ongoing childcare and eldercare commitments re-enter the professional world. The normalization of career breaks on platforms like LinkedIn and the rise of career re-entry programs by 40% of Fortune 500 companies underscore the growing recognition of the value these women bring to the workforce. Flexible work arrangements not only facilitate smoother transitions but also help in unlocking billions of dollars worth of untapped potential, contributing significantly to closing the gender pay gap.
The Path Forward to Gender Equality: Embracing Flexibility
To prevent the erosion of gender equality in the workplace, organizations must learn from the mistakes of the private sector and instead embrace flexible work arrangements. Hybrid and remote work models not only support women but also enhance overall productivity and employee satisfaction. High-performing organizations recognize the importance of flexibility, with many offering remote work options three to four days a week or more. These organizations focus on output rather than physical presence, measuring performance based on creativity, innovation, and contribution to long-term strategy.
Leaders must also address the issue of proximity bias, where in-office workers are perceived as better performers and more likely to be promoted. This bias can undermine the benefits of flexible work arrangements for women. By focusing on output and establishing transparent performance metrics, companies can ensure fair evaluations and career progression opportunities for all employees, regardless of their work location.
领英推荐
Conclusion
The push for RTO policies threatens to undo the progress made toward gender equality in the workplace. Forced RTO disproportionately impacts women, especially those with caregiving responsibilities, and risks pushing them out of the workforce. To foster inclusive workplaces and retain top talent, organizations must prioritize flexibility in their work arrangements. By doing so, they not only support women but also create a more dynamic, diverse, and productive workforce. The future of work hinges on the ability to adapt and embrace flexibility, ensuring that the gains made during the pandemic are not lost but built upon for a more equitable tomorrow.
Key Take-Away
Forced return-to-office (RTO) policies threaten gender equality by disproportionately impacting women, especially those with caregiving roles. These policies risk pushing women out of the workforce, reversing gains made in career advancement and closing the gender pay gap… >Click to tweet
Image credit: Moe Magners/pexels
Originally published in Disaster Avoidance Experts
Want to make the wisest and most profitable decisions via neuroscience? This article is part of my new LinkedIn newsletter series on this topic, called the Wise Decision Maker Guide.
If you want to avoid decision disasters and instead maximize success in your business and career, register to get notifications about new posts by clicking the blue Subscribe button at the top of this page below the image. Also, make sure to sign up for the FREE Wise Decision Maker Course and get my “Assessment on Dangerous Judgment Errors in the Workplace” and other resources by signing up here.
Trusted Advisor, Systemic-Psychodynamic Coach, President
1 个月'...opened the door for women to pursue high paying roles, etc.?' - The pandemic did none of the things you advocate. Also the backlash on DEI is not fuelled by RTO, or increased performance caused by it, on the contrary. Repeated questioning of leaders has yet to demonstrate any solid evidence of sustainable advances in performance, productivity, or bias reduction as a consequence of LGBT, DEI policies or practices. However, I do agree, in general a return to a strict RTO policy will show up as counterproductive, but not for the reasons you promote.
Vice President - Group Audit Staff Development, Deutsche Bank ENTP-A
1 个月Just when an initiative emerges to help level the playing field for women in the form of hybrid working, companies like JP Morgan decide to return to the “Office of the 1950s” command and control playbook. Instead of being able to integrate work and life, we’re back to work v. life. What will we see next? Is the return to “proper office attire” on the cards?
Bible lover. Founder at Zingrevenue. Insurance, coding and AI geek.
1 个月Thank you for highlighting this Dr. Gleb Tsipursky, it is thought provoking (and sad). It's also worth noting that there is a parallel trend of rapidly rolling back progress (like equality and inclusion initiatives) for fear of political backlash. Business leaders need to stay calm and courageous to steer the ship based on internal moral compass, and bold chairpeople hold the key to keeping the company true and faithful to all stakeholders.