In-House Bank: A Guide for Treasury Management

In-house banking (IHB) represents a strategic solution in the corporate treasury management. By utilizing a company's own resources for financing, an in-house bank centralizes treasury functions such as funding, FX, and cash management into one entity. This approach is not only cost-effective but also enhances transparency and efficiency, allowing companies to manage banking relationships, currency risk, payments, and collections centrally.

In this article will explore the optimal conditions for establishing an IHB, its capabilities, benefits, and the necessary technological and structural considerations for successful implementation.

The Right Conditions for an In-House Bank

Large, multinational companies with complex external banking structures, high number of subsidiaries, and a high volume of vendor payments and intercompany invoices are ideal candidates for an IBH. As example the logistics leader DHL utilizes an in-house bank to manage operations across more than country. Each subsidiary operates with separate external bank accounts, which are zero balance account (ZBA) structured into DHL’s parent’s master account in the U.S. This centralization enables daily sweeping of net cash to Europe and intercompany clearing which significantly reducing transaction fees and wire costs while managing FX exposures for subsidiaries.

Technological developments have made IHBs feasible for smaller, less complex companies as well. However, the transition requires careful planning and a solid business case to gain upper management support. Key considerations include:

• Bank Account Structure Alignment: Ensuring funds can move seamlessly between subsidiaries and the parent company.
• Documentation Compliance: Adhering to the regulations, such as documenting cash movements adequately.

Benefits of an In-House Bank

An IHB offers treasury departments a range of functionalities, including:

1. Centralized Control: Managing all subsidiaries’ accounts and FX exposures from a single platform.
2. Funds Concentration: Using concentration accounts to accumulate and distribute funds efficiently.
3. Reduced Reliance on External Funding: Minimizing the need for external loans, credit facilities, and investment instruments.
4. Customized Lender and Borrower Rates: Establishing company-specific rates and terms for internal financing.
5. Enhanced Cash Visibility: Improving the tracking of cash and balances across the organization.

Structuring Your In-House Bank

Critical decisions in structuring an IHB include:

• Legal Ownership: Determining the legal entity or entities that will own the IHB.
• Process Inclusions: Deciding which processes to incorporate.
• Regional Participation: Selecting countries for participation based on currencies, intercompany lending regulations, and growth potential.
• Responsibility Allocation: Assigning responsibility for FX exposures and operational management.
• Regulatory Compliance: Navigating potential regulatory and tax implications.

Technology Solutions for an In-House Bank

Investing in technology is extremely important for the success of an IHB. A treasury management system (TMS) is essential for tracking intercompany transactions and achieving automation. Key technological components include:

• ERP Integration: Linking accounting and ERP systems for seamless intracompany and intercompany loan management.
• Virtual Accounts: Utilizing virtual accounts to segregate and organize data within a single physical account, acting as intercompany ledgers.
• Automated Programs: Developing automated solutions for managing non-functional currencies and intercompany transactions.

Real-World Success Stories

Comcast Capital Corporation

Comcast's treasury team implemented an IHB structure to streamline cash and liquidity management across its global operations. Post-acquisition, Comcast faced a fragmented banking structure with 100 relationships and 3,800 accounts. By focusing initially on the Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) region, Comcast reduced the number of banks from 24 to 6 and centralized 80% of cash, unlocking over $1 billion in liquidity.

Key lessons from Comcast's experience include:

• Wave Rollout: Implementing changes progressively to manage resources effectively.
• Stakeholder Engagement: Ensuring all stakeholders understand their roles and the benefits.
• Early Involvement of Technology Teams: Engaging technology and cyber teams from the outset to identify and solve potential issues.

Sun Chemical

Sun Chemical's integration of an in-house bank with its notional pool dramatically improved FX exposure management. With operations in 56 countries, the company centralized its cash pool in Amsterdam, reducing currency-related bank accounts and enabling a robust payment factory. This approach significantly reduced transaction costs and provided greater control over currency exposures.

Conclusion

In-house banking offers a transformative approach to treasury management, providing increased efficiency, reduced banking fees, and improved cash visibility. With advancements in technology and regulatory flexibility, more companies can now consider adopting an IHB. Evaluating the feasibility of an IHB involves understanding the organizational structure, technological requirements, and the strategic benefits it can deliver. By learning from industry leaders like Comcast and Sun Chemical, companies can successfully navigate the complexities of implementing an in-house bank and achieve substantial operational improvements and cost savings.

?