Impounding of Deeds, Agreements, and Remedies in Light of the Apex Court's "NM Global Decision":

What is meant by impounding a document?

The term "impounding of documents" refers to the legal act of seizing or taking possession of certain documents or materials by a competent authority, typically a court or a law enforcement agency. The impounded documents are held by the authority as evidence or for safekeeping, and their access or use may be restricted or controlled.

Impounding documents can occur in various legal contexts, such as criminal investigations, civil litigation, or regulatory proceedings. The purpose is usually to preserve the integrity of the evidence, prevent tampering or destruction, and ensure that the documents are available for examination during legal proceedings.

For example, in a criminal case, if the authorities believe that certain documents or records are crucial to the investigation or could be used as evidence, they may obtain a court order to impound those documents. Once impounded, the documents are placed in the custody of the court or a designated officer until they are needed for trial.

Impounding documents is a legal procedure that balances the need to protect the documents with the rights of the parties involved. It is typically carried out under specific legal provisions and subject to court oversight to ensure fairness and proper handling of the impounded materials.

Supreme Court of India recently held that if agreements are made without paying stamp duty the same shall be impounded by the court. What is the context?

In India, stamp duty is a type of tax levied on various types of legal documents, such as agreements, contracts, deeds, and other instruments. The payment of stamp duty is mandatory under the Indian Stamp Act, of 1899, and is enforced by state governments.

The context refers to a decision or ruling by the Supreme Court of India regarding agreements made without paying the required stamp duty. The context is a decision on N.N. Global Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s Indo Unique Flame Ltd. & Ors.

In early 2021, a three-judge bench in N.N. Global Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s Indo Unique Flame Ltd. & Ors.(erstwhile NN Global)referred the question of whether an arbitration agreement contained in an unstamped principal agreement is enforceable to a larger constitution bench. On 25 April 2023, the larger constitution bench, in 3:2 majority answered the question in the negative and held that the principal agreement containing the arbitration provision must be sufficiently stamped prior to initiation of arbitration.

If an agreement is executed without paying the necessary stamp duty, it is considered deficient or unstamped. In such cases, the agreement may not be admissible as evidence in court, and its legal enforceability may be compromised.

If the issue of non-payment of stamp duty is brought to the attention of the court, or if the court itself found that the agreement submitted for its consideration as evidence is without stamp duty or insufficiently paid, the court may direct the impounding of the same. Impounding in this context means that the court seizes or takes custody of the document and retains it in its possession until the appropriate stamp duty and penalties, if any, are paid.

Once the stamp duty and penalties are paid, the court may release the impounded document. The payment of the requisite stamp duty may also involve additional fees or penalties, depending on the relevant stamp duty laws of the respective Indian state.

What is the procedure to be taken by the courts while impounding a document?

When a court decides to impound a document, it follows a specific procedure to ensure fairness and proper handling of the impounded material. The exact procedure may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific rules of the court. The following are the steps involved in impounding a document:

1. Court Order: The impounding of a document is typically initiated through a court order. The court, upon receiving an application or becoming aware of the need to impound a document, issues an order specifying the document to be impounded and the reasons for impounding.
2. Physical Possession: The court's order empowers a designated court officer or an authorized person to physically take possession of the document. This person is responsible for ensuring the proper handling and safekeeping of the document during impoundment.
3. Sealing and Labeling: The document is usually sealed and labeled to indicate that it has been impounded by the court. The seal helps maintain the integrity of the document and prevents unauthorized access or tampering.
4. Custody and Record Keeping: The court or its designated officer assumes custody of the impounded document. The document is recorded in a register or maintained as part of the court's record, clearly indicating details such as the case number, impoundment date, and relevant parties.
5. Access Restrictions: The impounded document is often subject to access restrictions. Only authorized personnel, such as the court staff or concerned parties to the case, may be allowed access to the document. This is done to ensure the document's confidentiality and to prevent interference or tampering.
6. Court Control: The court retains control over the impounded document throughout the legal proceedings. It may issue further orders regarding the use, examination, or release of the document, as deemed necessary in the interest of justice.
7. Return or Disposal: Once the impounded document is no longer required for legal proceedings, the court may order its return to the rightful owner or disposal as per applicable laws or regulations. The document's return or disposal process is carried out under the court's supervision.

When a court impounds an agreement for the dearth of stamp duty whether the same can be considered a valid agreement?

When a court impounds an agreement due to lack or deficiency of stamp duty, it typically means that the agreement has not been properly stamped or the appropriate stamp duty has not been paid according to the applicable laws and regulations. In such cases, the question of the validity of the agreement can arise. An agreement that lacks proper stamp duty can be considered defective in law.

Stamp duty is a form of tax imposed by the government on certain types of documents, including agreements, to give them legal validity and enforceability. Failure to pay the required stamp duty may render the agreement invalid or unenforceable, depending on the laws of the jurisdiction where the agreement is being considered.

The specific consequences and remedies for an agreement with a dearth of stamp duty can vary based on the laws of the particular jurisdiction. Here are some general principles:

1. Inadmissibility as Evidence: An agreement that lacks proper stamp duty may be deemed inadmissible as evidence in a court of law. The court may impound the agreement and prevent it from being relied upon in legal proceedings until the stamp duty deficiency is rectified.
2. Payment of Stamp Duty: To remedy the situation, it is usually necessary to pay the required stamp duty along with any applicable penalties or fines. Once the stamp duty is paid, the agreement may be considered valid and admissible as evidence, subject to the discretion of the court.
3. Consequences of Non-Payment: If the stamp duty remains unpaid, the agreement may be considered void or unenforceable. This means that the parties to the agreement may not be able to rely on it or seek legal remedies based on its terms. The Non-payment of stamp duty can also result in legal consequences, such as fines or penalties imposed by the relevant authorities.

What laws in India will apply in respect of stamp duty for agreements, lease deeds, sale deeds, etc.?

In India, the stamp duty on various types of agreements, lease deeds, sale deeds, and other documents is governed by the Indian Stamp Act, of 1899. This act, enacted by the Parliament of India, provides the legal framework for the levy and collection of stamp duty.

The Indian Stamp Act is a central legislation that applies to the whole of India, including all states and union territories. However, stamp duty rates and specific provisions may vary from state to state as each state has the authority to amend and modify the act and prescribe its own stamp duty rates.

Here are some key points regarding stamp duty in India:

1. Applicability: The Indian Stamp Act applies to a wide range of documents, including agreements, lease deeds, sale deeds, work contracts, conveyances, mortgages, gift deeds, powers of attorney, and more.
2. Stamp Duty Rates: The stamp duty rates for various documents are determined by each state government. These rates can vary based on factors such as the nature of the document, the value of the transaction, and the location of the property. Each state government issues a schedule of stamp duty rates, which is periodically revised.
3. Payment of Stamp Duty: Stamp duty must be paid on the relevant documents before or at the time of execution, depending on the specific state's rules. The duty can be paid through physical stamp paper or e-stamping (electronic stamping) methods, as provided by the state government.
4. Stamp Duty Calculation: The stamp duty payable is generally calculated based on the value of the transaction or the market value of the property, whichever is higher. Each state may have its own method of calculating stamp duty, and exemptions or concessions may be available for certain categories of transactions, such as affordable housing or charitable purposes.
5. Registration: In addition to payment of stamp duty, certain documents, such as lease deeds, sale deeds, and conveyances, may also require registration under the relevant state's Registration Act. The stamp duty paid on such documents is often considered as evidence of payment of consideration or part thereof.

What is the remedy to clear the impounded agreement or deed from the Court?

When a court impounds an agreement, it typically means that the court has seized or taken possession of the agreement as evidence in a legal proceeding. If you are seeking a remedy to clear or resolve the impoundment of the agreement, the specific steps and options available to you may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the circumstances of the case. Some probable suggestions are given hereunder:

1. Legal Advice: It is important to consult with an attorney who specializes in the relevant area of law to understand the specific procedures and remedies available in your jurisdiction. They can provide you with personalized guidance based on the details of your situation.
2. Motion to Release/Unseal: Your attorney may advise you to file a motion with the court requesting the release or unsealing of the impounded agreement. This motion should outline the reasons why the agreement should no longer be impounded and why its release is necessary.
3. Grounds for Release: Typically, you would need to demonstrate a legitimate reason for the court to release the impounded agreement. For example, you might argue that the agreement is essential to your defense, that it contains information crucial to the case, or that it should be available for public scrutiny in the interest of transparency.
4. Balancing Interests: Courts often balance the interests of the parties involved when deciding whether to release an impounded agreement. They consider factors such as privacy concerns, the potential harm that may result from its release and the public interest in accessing the information.
5. Protective Orders: In some cases, the court may be willing to release the agreement under certain conditions or restrictions to protect sensitive information. This can involve issuing a protective order that limits who can access the agreement or placing redactions on specific portions of the document.

When a court impounds an agreement or deed, whether the same will become non-est in law?

When a court impounds an agreement or deed, it means that the court has taken possession of the document and has placed it under its control as part of a legal proceeding. The impoundment of an agreement or deed does not automatically render it non-est (non-existent) in law. However, the impoundment may have certain consequences depending on the specific circumstances and the orders of the court.

Here are some key points to consider:

1. Admissibility as Evidence: When an agreement or deed is impounded, it may be treated as evidence in the legal proceeding for which it was impounded. The court may retain control over the document to prevent tampering or unauthorized use.
2. Restriction on Use: The impoundment of an agreement or deed typically restricts its use by the parties involved. This means that the parties may not be able to rely on the document or present it as evidence in other legal proceedings without the permission of the court.
3. Court's Discretion: The court has the discretion to determine the consequences of impounding an agreement or deed. It may order that the document remains under its control until a certain condition is met or until the conclusion of the legal proceeding. The court may also decide to release the document under certain conditions or restrictions.
4. Potential Invalidity: In certain cases, the court may impound an agreement or deed due to reasons that question its validity or enforceability. For example, if the document is found to be fraudulent or illegal, the court may take control of it to prevent its use in furtherance of any wrongdoing.

How does the impounded agreement or deed affect the arbitration agreement in it? Whether the arbitrator can act on the basis of an impounded agreement or deed?

When an agreement or deed is impounded in the context of an arbitration proceeding, it may impact the arbitration agreement contained within that document. The impoundment of the agreement or deed does not automatically invalidate the arbitration agreement itself. However, it can have implications for the proceedings and the ability of the arbitrator to rely on the impounded document.

Here are some key points to consider regarding the effect of an impounded agreement or deed on the arbitration agreement:

1. Admissibility and Relevance: The impoundment of an agreement or deed means that the document is under the control of the arbitrator or the court. The arbitrator may consider the impounded document as evidence and assess its admissibility and relevance to the arbitration proceedings. However, the latest Supreme Court decision (NN Global Decision) says that the no stamp duty paid or insufficiently paid arbitration agreement cannot provide jurisdiction to the arbitrator - until the same complies with the Stamp Duty Act.
2. Confidentiality: The impoundment of an agreement or deed may affect the confidentiality provisions within the arbitration agreement. The impounded document may be subject to disclosure or shared with the parties involved in the arbitration, as well as potentially with the court, depending on the circumstances.
3. Jurisdictional Impact: The impoundment of an agreement or deed can potentially impact the jurisdictional authority of the arbitrator. If the impounded document forms a crucial part of the arbitration agreement and the arbitrator's jurisdiction is dependent on it, the impoundment may affect the arbitrator's ability to proceed or render certain decisions.
4. Validity and Enforceability: While the impoundment of an agreement or deed does not automatically invalidate the arbitration agreement if the impoundment raises concerns regarding the validity or enforceability of the arbitration agreement itself, it may be subject to challenge. In such cases, the parties may need to seek recourse in court to address the validity of the arbitration agreement or the effect of the impoundment on the arbitration process.

What are the likely scenarios in arbitration regarding no stamp duty, or insufficient stamp duty?

When a dispute arises regarding stamp duty with respect to an arbitration agreement the following three situations may arise:

(i) Before the Court: where parties fail to mutually decide on an arbitral tribunal and approach the appropriate Court to appoint the same u/s 11 of the A&C Act.

(ii) Before the Court: where a party institutes suit proceedings before a Court and the opposite party seeks reference of the dispute to arbitration.

(iii) Before the arbitral tribunal: where parties mutually agree on an arbitral tribunal, the arbitral tribunal so appointed will consider the issue of stamp duty.

In scenario (iii) above, the Court is not involved, and the arbitral tribunal will require the parties to sufficiently stamp the principal agreement before proceeding further.

What precautions are to be taken by the parties while invoking arbitration in consideration of the Stamps Act?

When invoking arbitration, it is important for parties to consider the requirements and implications of the Stamps Act or Stamp Duty laws. Here are some general precautions to consider:

1. Properly Stamp the Arbitration Agreement: Ensure that the arbitration agreement, which is typically a written contract, is duly stamped in accordance with the Stamp Duty laws of the relevant jurisdiction. The agreement should be executed on the appropriate value of stamp paper as per the prescribed rates. Failure to comply with stamping requirements may affect the validity and enforceability of the arbitration agreement.
2. Determine the Applicable Stamp Duty: Determine the applicable stamp duty for the arbitration agreement based on the value of the subject matter or any other criteria specified by the Stamp Duty laws. Bombay Stamps Act is having different rules and value sets, in comparison with Telangana State Stamps Act. Hence, each jurisdiction may have its own schedule of stamp duty rates, so it is important to consult the relevant laws and seek professional advice if needed.
3. Pay the Stamp Duty: Ensure that the stamp duty is paid on the arbitration agreement and the subsisting contract as required by the Stamp Duty laws. This includes affixing physical stamp papers or using electronic stamping methods, as allowed by the jurisdiction. Prompt and proper payment of stamp duty is essential to avoid any challenges to the validity or enforceability of the arbitration agreement.
4. Retain Stamp Duty Receipts: Keep records and receipts of the stamp duty payment to demonstrate compliance with the Stamp Duty laws. These receipts may be necessary to prove payment of stamp duty in case of any disputes or challenges to the arbitration agreement.
5. Seek Legal Advice: Consult with a qualified counsel who is knowledgeable about the Stamp Duty laws and arbitration procedures in the relevant jurisdiction. They can provide guidance on the specific requirements and precautions to be taken while invoking arbitration in consideration of the Stamp Act.

A small mistake may cost dear, and impact the litigation or arbitration course. Stamp Duty is a tax to be paid to the government. Non-compliance in time will have a penal effect for breach of rules. At times you may lose the chance to invoke arbitration itself. ignorance of the law is no excuse!

-----------------------------

Please contact?Krishna Rao Velagapudi?through this?Google Form?for any queries on the above subject.

??? ???? ?????? ?? ?????????? ??????????????????. ??? ???? ???????? ?? к???????????????? ??????????????. ?????? ???????????????? ???????????????? ???? ?????????????? ???? ?? ???????????????????? ??????????????, ?????? ???????? ???? ?????????????? ???? ???????????? ????????????????????.

#arbitration?#settlement?#disputes?#solution?#arbindo?#professionels