An important piece in the climate conversation

An important piece in the climate conversation

Around the world, there are important conversations going on regarding carbon emissions. Countries, companies and communities are all looking for solutions that move us toward a lower-carbon future.

As energy providers, we have an important role to play, and I’m pleased that utilities in the United States have already made solid progress on carbon emissions. At Duke Energy, we reduced our carbon emissions 31 percent since 2005, which meets or exceeds the standards of the former Clean Power Plan and the 2025 U.S. commitment to the Paris Agreement.

Yet it’s clear we must do more.

That’s why we refreshed our climate strategy, establishing a carbon reduction goal of at least 50 percent by 2030 and net zero by 2050. We have a clear line of sight to achieving the 2030 goal – with investments in renewables, storage, natural gas, energy efficiency and the retirement of coal plants serving as important solutions over the next decade. To reach our 2050 goal, we are strong advocates for investments in research and development to find new technologies necessary to close the gap to net zero – including enhanced storage, carbon capture and advanced nuclear. 

But to meet these short- and long-term goals, there is a resource that is often overlooked – one that is carbon-free and runs 95 percent of the time. That resource is nuclear. 

Nuclear provides more than half of our country’s carbon-free energy. For Duke Energy, nuclear accounts for more than 50 percent of our generation in the Carolinas. Nuclear is foundational to our climate strategy, and we are pursuing subsequent license renewals for our fleet. This will enable us to operate our plants for another 20 years.

Our ability to achieve these aggressive carbon reduction goals for the benefit of our customers and communities is dependent upon the reliability of nuclear energy. 

Keeping our nuclear plants running will also help make the transition to cleaner energy sources more cost-effective. Case in point: A recent MIT study highlighted the high cost of powering the grid primarily with intermittent renewables and the importance of having diverse energy resources, like nuclear.

The conversation on carbon emissions will only accelerate in 2020 and beyond, and we’re committed to being part of the solution. But as we move forward, we believe nuclear deserves a seat at the table.

Jerry Marco

buyers and sellers of used equipment and surplus machinery. demolition and removal service plant and boneyard clean up service. SCRAP buyers big pieces and hard to move items.

4 年

Hello Lynn, it is very urgent that you contact me please. your company recently put my company personal in danger by exposing them to covid 19 i don't know if it was knowingly yet. but we really need to talk Jerry Marco 281-772-7474

回复
Larry Stalica

Global Energy Executive

4 年

Well written article, Lynn. As someone who started his career in the Naval Reactors Program, I support nuclear power and the role it plays in our future generation mix. Carbon free and low variable cost if the plants are managed and run properly. Duke has a good track record here. Where we need to be careful is when poorly run nuclear assets are subsidized (and not for the first time) by end use customers.

I agree!

回复
Adam Helsel, PE

Staff Engineer Facilities at FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies

4 年

Slide for life!

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了