An Important Lesson in Board Director Risk

A?Different Perspective on the Boeing Board's Challenges

(Originally appeared in the September 15th, 2021?'Across the Board'?digital publication, a Board Director, Board Advisor, C-Level, and Business Leader publication reaching 48,000+ exceptional business leaders in over 70 countries with articles focused on leadership, strategy, and governance topics - sign up here)

Boeing's Board finds itself in a predicament no Director ever wants to be in -?facing?a major lawsuit from shareholders for malfeasance and dereliction of duty - a?shareholder derivative suit.?Many Directors break a sweat just hearing these words.

A?shareholder derivative suit?is a lawsuit brought by a shareholder(s) on behalf of a corporation against a third party.?In many cases, the third party is an insider of the corporation, such as an executive officer or director. Shareholder derivative suits are unique because under traditional corporate law, management is responsible for bringing and defending the corporation against suit. Shareholder derivative suits permit a shareholder to initiate a suit when management has failed to do so. These types of suits are known for their lengthy proceedings and for becoming quite messy.?Following?two fatal crashes that killed 346 people in 2018 and 2019, a U.S. judge has ruled that the Boeing Board has liability, subsequently ushering in the?ability for shareholders to take action in this manner due to their financial losses. The named Board Members in the suit will likely not only be those who continue to serve on the Board and were in place during these deadly?accidents, but also those Board Members who have since left?the Board, but were serving?during the time in question.

Although the?Delaware ruling?on September 7th, 2021?by Vice Chancellor Morgan Zurn?noted the real victims of the crashes?were the deceased and their loved ones, the ruling?additionally, and rightfully so, stated?"corporate law recognizes another set of victims: Boeing as an enterprise, and its stock-holders."?This?considerable ruling stated that?"the Board should have heeded but instead ignored"?a red flag?relating to the aircrafts' safety systems (known as MCAS)?following the first crash in 2018?and that the?"stockholders may pursue the Company's oversight claim against the Board."

Boeing has already paid large fines in an effort to?settle their malfeasance:

• In early 2021,?Boeing agreed to pay $2.5 billion in fines to settle a criminal charge of defrauding?regulators overseeing the 737 MAX aircraft.
• In May 2021, Boeing additionally agreed to pay a $17 million fine and commit to improving?its supply chain and production practices following the discovery that Boeing had?installed?unapproved equipment on a significant number?of its aircraft.

Now, a?shareholder derivative suit opens the door for additional, and potentially very costly, payouts for the company and/or their Directors' & Officers' (D&O) insurance carrier. (see the article?'Do You Do The D&O'?for more details on Board Director indemnification, D&O insurance, and Independent?Director Liability (IDL) insurance)

Much of what I have mentioned is well known already in Board Director circles in a relatively?short amount of time...?however, is there more to the story??It looks that way. I was?obsessively?curious to know how the Board was structured leading up to?this predicament where Boeing is today - specifically, how the Board's risk oversight was structured along with?its ties to proactive governance oversight.?In researching how?this?risk / governance oversight was?handled as it relates to Boeing's?Board Architecture, some interesting observations and practices were noted...

An organization's yearly proxy statement is a great window into?the?organization, however, reviewing?the last 10 years of an organization's proxy statements can show?important longer-term trending. Over?the?past few weeks, I?have read through and compared the?last 10 years of Boeing's proxy statements?presented at each of their yearly Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Of particular interest to me was to investigate?any changes to the structure of Boeing's Board of Directors in 2017?through 2021 - specifically, their Board Committees. Were there any changes or enhancements following a major risk-related incident? In addition to people changes (Board Members, CEO, etc.), was there anything notable or indicative of how the Board's?operations would be handled going forward? What did the Board think went wrong and how would they lessen or eliminate the chances of this happening again in the future??Something interesting can definitely be seen in the 10 year review and comparison. The 2019 proxy statement?lists the in-place and operational Board Committees serving the organization throughout 2018 - up to and including the first 737 MAX crash in October 2018. These standing Board Committees?included the:

• Audit Committee
• Compensation Committee
• Finance Committee
• Governance, Organization and Nominating Committee
• Special Programs Committee?(for classified U.S. government programs)

In all honesty, I was looking for a dedicated Risk Committee. What I instead found was risk oversight components spread throughout each of the Board Committees. Boeing's?2019 proxy statement, and many before it, have a specific?'Risk Oversight'?outline in the Corporate Governance section. Essentially, the entire Board was responsible for risk (which I agree with), but risk oversight didn't have a?'home.' Although this is not as rare as I would personally like it to be, it?is not the first time?that a Board with a decentralized risk oversight model has sown?the seeds of future challenges - some of which seem quite obvious to immediately?address (i.e. deep safety and risk evaluations, possibly?immediate aircraft groundings,?directly following the?first?737 MAX?aircraft crash in October 2018). Boeing's 2019 proxy statement, within the Risk Oversight section, goes on?to state,?"The Board is responsible for overseeing management in the execution of its risk management responsibilities and for assessing the Company’s approach to risk management. The Board regularly assesses significant risks to the Company in the course of reviews of corporate strategy and the development of our long-range business plan, including significant new development programs. As part of its responsibilities, the Board and its standing committees also regularly review strategic, operational, financial, compensation, and compliance risks with senior management. Examples of risk oversight activities conducted by the Board’s committees, subject to committee report-outs and full discussion at the Board level, are set forth below."?This section goes on to list specific aligned risk duties of each specific Board Committee.?Again, this is fine in an attempt to have all Board Members involved and owning the organization's risks, but where is the overall process, measurement, follow up,?and outcome?owned? It is the integrated, not siloed, view where major risks commonly dwell.

Shockingly, the Boeing?Board kept this same committee structure in place through early 2019, up to and including the second 737 MAX crash in March 2019, as seen in its?2020 proxy statement, which?defined?the in-place?structure of the 2019 Board.

This same?2020 proxy statement?shows in the month following the second 737 MAX crash (April 2019), the Boeing Board finally instituted a?temporary Committee on?Airplane Policies and Processes, holding?four formal meetings and more than a dozen informal meetings leading up to the committee's?"dissolution in August 2019, at which time it was replaced with the permanent Aerospace Safety Committee."

It is important to note that per the description of the?permanent?Aerospace Safety Committee?in the 2020 proxy statement, this is indeed a formal?Risk Committee?operating under a different name.

Taken directly from the 2020 proxy statement,?"The Aerospace Safety Committee, established by the Board in 2019, is responsible for directly overseeing our engineering, design, development, manufacture, production, operations, maintenance, and delivery of aerospace products and services, in order to ensure the safety of our commercial, defense, space, and other aerospace products and services.

• In order to fulfill this responsibility, the Aerospace Safety Committee provides direct oversight over: our safety-related policies and processes;
• certification activities;
• our policies and processes for engaging with and supporting the regulatory oversight of the Federal Aviation Administration, the Department of Defense, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and non-U.S. commercial, defense, and space aviation safety regulators;
• our participation in and support of accident investigations conducted by the National Transportation Safety Board and other domestic and international investigatory authorities, including our responses to material findings and conclusions of such investigations;
• our pilot training programs and services; and
• cybersecurity with respect to our aerospace products.

In addition, the Aerospace Safety Committee consults with the Compensation Committee in connection with the safety review portion of executive individual performance evaluations. The Aerospace Safety Committee is composed entirely of directors who satisfy NYSE director independence standards and our Director Independence Standards."?This newly added and integrated risk funnel,?now having a formal 'home'?as a Board Committee (centralized risk oversight), while?simultaneously leveraging Boeing's existing?risk oversight approach (previously defined as decentralized risk oversight in this article), should together serve?this Board?very well into the future.

“The presence of a Board Risk Committee at organizations with any degree of strategic complexity is rapidly becoming a fiduciary expectation,”?states?David R. Koenig, President and CEO of the?DCRO Institute, a global educational nonprofit dedicated to bringing risk expertise to the boardroom & c-suite.?“It is a fundamental duty of care for Board Members to ensure their organizations have a risk infrastructure, including a?dedicated?Risk Committee, commensurate to the complexity of the organization, its markets, and customers,?and?qualified risk Directors?to serve on that committee.”?Boards should heed this profound advice.

Numerous other articles on the Boeing story have focused solely on the?symptoms and outcome of their challenges, seemingly avoiding the true cause. At this point in my career, I firmly believe a large percentage of Board?failures reside in two hidden?areas:

• Cloaked?strategy?issues and failures believed to?be?governance shortcomings,?or?the lacking interrelationship and understanding?of strategy & governance as it relates to the Board.
• Board Architecture?(structure) shortcomings unknowingly forcing risk scenarios to grow exponentially in time and magnitude.

The moral of this story: as either an?aspiring or experienced Director, look deeply at how the Board's risk oversight components are structured. More specifically, is there a centralized model of risk ownership (Board?Committee) acting as a?'home'?with?an additional component of stand-alone (decentralized) risk inputs that incorporates the?individual Board Members as well as all Board Committees??This simple check may just be the way to avoid becoming an?overnight expert?in your organization's indemnification clauses, D&O insurance policy, Independent Director?Liability (IDL) policy,?and the?complicated as well as scary?world of D&O exclusions ...or worse?yet, your potential?personal liability as a Director.

Is your?Board properly?mitigating risk?

Reach Out if you need help in mitigating?your Board's risk with our?Consulting &?Advisory?offerings,?Board Director Education & Certification program,?and?International Speaking Tour?topics.

Mark A. Pfister - Non-Executive Director |?CEO |?Chief?Board Consultant?| Corporate?Strategist | Board Macro-Influencer?| Speaker?| Author - www.PfisterStrategy.com

About the Author:?In addition to serving?on numerous Boards, Mark A. Pfister is a renowned Board Consultant,?'Board Macro-Influencer,'?certified Board Director, speaker, author, and advises public, private, and nonprofit Boards in efficient and effective operations. Known as?'The Board Architect,'?he is also the inventor of the?'Board as a Service'?(BaaS) engagement model and an expert Project Executive?frequently advising on strategic global initiatives in their initiation and operational phases......?<< read full bio?here?>>

____________

Sponsored Advertisements

Advertise With Us

Have something that could benefit the?'Across The Board'?community and further elevate leadership? By all means,?click?for audience engagement details,?pricing, and multi-article discounts. Get your coveted offerings in front of the premier curated group of 26,500+ Board Directors, Board Advisors, C-Level, and Business Leaders in over 70?countries. The right audience makes all the difference!

____________

Education?& Certification

____________

Have Mark join you on his?International?Speaking Tours?

[ 60+ speaking engagements every year?]

Available in online / video conference formats

'Becoming an Exceptional Board Director Candidate'?Learn the proven and effective steps to plan and implement your Board Director strategy. Experience how these achievable & focused efforts help you convey the expertise and confidence needed for serious Board Director / Board Advisor consideration (Available as?a?speaking engagementand/or an?education?&?certification course).

'Building an Effective Board For Your Company'?shows business owners and leaders the immense value of creating or rebuilding an experienced?'go-to'?Board of Directors or Board of Advisors - and most importantly, how to do it via a step-by-step roadmap. Make your company soar with the right foundational elements of an effective Board. (Available as?a?speaking engagement?and/or?consulting engagement).

'Customizable Board of Directors and Leadership Topics'?With a passion for teaching, collaborating, and sharing information, Mark A. Pfister has joined the stage as a keynoter, sole presenter, moderator, and panelist on countless speaking engagements on the topics of strategy, governance, leadership, and Board Directorship. When organizations search for a speaker to leave a lasting impression, Mr. Pfister is frequently considered due to his combination of experience, presence, and ability to make a true connection with audiences. It has been quoted,?“Mark’s ability to collaborate and seamlessly incorporate a requested topic into his repertoire during our many conferences has not only elevated our organization’s image, but also made our yearly event a ‘must attend’ for many executives joining us from around the world.”?(Available as?a?speaking engagement?and/or?consulting engagement).

'The Strategy of Strategy'?Guides Boards and audiences through the 2500+ year history, evolution and next phase of formal Strategy -?'Amorphic Strategy.'?Learn why strategy is so relevant to you personally,?your organization, and your role as a Board Director. Build a viable strategy and?experience how these focused efforts will help you and your organization thrive and reach full potential?(speaker video).?(Available as?a?speaking engagement?and/or?consulting engagement).

____________

Here's Some Additional Reading

The Pre-IPO Board

The Board Candidate's Balancing Act

The Lake Wobegon Board

The Foreseeable Supply Chain Crisis

The Board Candidate's Checklist

The Risk and Values Alliance

See all articles?here

★???Join Our Mailing List???★

____________

"Get Quoted"

Want to be quoted in an upcoming?'Across The Board'?article on a topic you are passionate about? Over 200 experts have done so to-date. Propose an article topic or let us know your expertise area?and let's work through the details.?Reach out?to get your name and company in front of the premier curated group of global Business Leaders, C-Level, Board Directors, & Board Advisors - go ahead, make a name for yourself!

Also, explore the possibility?of providing an article quote and supportive?advertisement?simultaneously - these get the best traction and response.