The importance of preserving claim-related evidence
Jay Kramarczyk, PE, MSc, IAAI-CFI

The importance of preserving claim-related evidence

By Steve Powell, President, Unified Investigations & Sciences, Inc., a Sedgwick company

 

Whether a copier catches on fire, water damage forces a business to close or an employee is shocked while using an electrical device in the office, failing to preserve the claim-related evidence can prove to be costly.

 

When an injury, property loss or product failure happens, a forensic investigation company should be used to secure, collect and preserve the critical evidence. Only then can the forensic investigators bring clarity to the situation by determining who or what is at fault.

 

Consider this example – An office employee sits down to begin the day and his chair breaks causing him to fall and injure his back. The employee has extensive back injuries and the time off he needs to recover causes productivity issues. The reason why the chair malfunctioned may be lost if the evidence is not preserved.

 

If forensic experts are brought in, they will not only preserve the evidence, but will also do an extensive investigation and ask questions like – how did the chair malfunction and was it the chair that caused the injury? Those questions lead to others such as – how many of these chairs does the employer own and how many employees are exposed to this hazard? From a risk standpoint, it is important for the employer to know so they can prevent additional employee injuries. From a legal perspective, the outcome of the investigation may result in a subrogation case against the manufacturer of the chair or unveil negligence on behalf of the user.

 

Crossing every “t” and dotting every “i”

The forensic investigation process includes identifying, collecting, storing, preserving, examining and testing evidence so the insured party will know with certainty what caused the loss. A quality investigation will include a rigorous, detailed process with established industry standards that must be followed to ensure accuracy. It requires a skilled, experienced team that is trained in the recommended and accepted protocols that are part of a scientific method of processing physical evidence.

 

All evidence should be professionally collected, stored and preserved in accordance with applicable standards of care. The environment where the evidence is stored must be safe, secure, clean and organized in order to protect it from loss, contamination and degradation. The security and integrity of the physical evidence must be maintained from the time it is discovered at the loss scene through its collection, examination and testing. Steps including the receipt, transmittal and release of evidence must be fully documented by experts in evidence custody.

 

In addition to workers’ compensation claims, forensic investigations are also conducted for property and product liability claims. Here are a couple examples of situations where the expertise of a forensic investigation team can be valuable:

  • A medical facility has a major water leak coming from the 3rd floor that causes employees and visitors to slip and fall, damages the building’s mechanical and electrical equipment, and various items on the floors below. In this case, there are possible workers’ compensation injuries, property damage and liability claims, and the need for a thorough investigation into the cause of the water leak. It is prudent that a forensic investigation company is promptly dispatched to go there immediately, secure the evidence and start the process of figuring out what happened. In addition to professional investigators, the risk manager will also send engineers, and workers’ compensation, property and liability claims adjusters to determine the scope of the loss and the cause of the water leak. Once the origin and cause of the loss are identified, the forensic investigator will photograph the evidence, bag it, tag it, label it, transport it, store it and preserve it in a secure storage facility until it can be examined properly, and the cause of all of these claims is properly identified and documented.
  • A pharmaceutical company that uses refrigerators and freezers to store drugs had a refrigeration unit that stopped working, causing an entire supply of chemotherapy drugs to spoil. Here are some important questions to ask – why did the drugs spoil, how did they spoil, were the right protocols in place and whose fault is it? Unless it gets investigated and the evidence is properly captured promptly on the front end, there’s a high potential for spoliation of the evidence. If somebody touched the refrigeration unit or the drugs, tampered with them or changed them in any way, the evidence is not being preserved properly. A professional forensic investigation company is the right choice for managing the insured’s duty to preserve all evidence that can be subject to litigation.  

 

People + process = performance and results

When something bad happens, you need an expert in the item that failed or caused the loss – a generalist is less likely to provide a thorough, informed investigation.

 

At Unified Investigations & Sciences (Unified), we follow certain industry standards for methodical collection and preservation of evidence. We photograph it, label it, transport it and store it, and then catalog it and preserve it in one of our secure evidence facilities. We follow guidelines for the safe and systematic investigation and analysis of incidents including evidence handling and storage; the collection and preservation of information and physical items by any technical investigator pertaining to an incident that can be reasonably expected to be the subject of litigation; and for labeling physical evidence collected during field investigations, received in a forensic laboratory, or isolated, generated or prepared from items submitted for examination.

 

Not everybody in the claims process is educated on these standards – but forensic experts are. It is important to have experts who are trained, experienced, and know how to follow the guidelines to the letter – they must cross every “t” and dot every “i” to meet the requirements. For example, the standards for labeling items properly in the laboratory indicate that the following details must be included – unique file number, date and time collected, name of the person who collected it, a description of what the item is and where it came from. If it is missing those things, it’s incomplete. For someone who is not experienced in the collection and preservation of evidence, odds are they’re not going to complete the labeling process with those standards, and they’re not going to cross every “t” and dot every “i” in the investigation process.

 

Common mistakes include failure to identify and preserve the evidence, and altering the evidence before all interested parties were able to take a look at it. This can cause problems if the case goes into litigation and the evidence is needed.

 

When a loss occurs, companies and insured parties need forensic investigators who follow the scientific method, and faithfully use a dedicated, disciplined process to ensure they can accurately determine the cause of the loss.

 

SIDEBAR  ->    Power strip culprit of office fire

An insurance company insures a commercial office, the office building catches on fire, and the fire department comes in and puts the fire out. The insurance company hires Unified as their forensic investigation company to come to the scene, secure the evidence and figure out what caused the fire. Unified identifies the area of origin is a desk in a corner office with a laptop that was plugged into a new power strip with an electrical outlet in the wall. We took the laptop, power strip and wall outlets into evidence. The Unified team did some non-destructive testing with X-rays and our electrical engineers examined all the evidence. We determined that the power strip had a fault in it so the party that manufactured the device was put on notice. The manufacturer’s experts took a look at it and determined that our test results were correct. Instead of the insurance company writing a $300,000 check to replace the office building that burnt down, the company that manufactured the power strip accepted responsibility for the damages. None of that would have been possible if the evidence was not preserved.

 

Jaime Hoerricks, PhD

Autistic and Trans Special Education Teacher and author of No Place for Autism and Holistic Language Instruction.

8 年

Don't forget the silent witness - the CCTV system. Preserving the evidence in its native format will generally yield the best results.

Rob Painter

hashtag#Stealingwheels.com Forensic Automotive Analyst/Texas Licenced and Bonded Public Adjuster

8 年

Steve, very good article. i have attempted to stress these issues for years and some of the worst I have run into is the smaller municipalities law enforcement and fire service. i have also run into evidence retention issues with insurance carriers. one criminal case netted 7 photos on a burglary. a piece of blind was cut because it had the suspects blood. it was sent to the crime lab and after a year discarded. The home owner had a box of 12 IDs that the cop took a photo of. Baggies for crack taken of the floor. Either of which was unimportant to the cop because it was not part of the burglary. It was really something and defendant was looking at 2-20 years. The case was eventually dismissed and it didn't have to go down this way. They just did not have the training needed. If I get Tim, I may write a follow up article on my experience on these issues. Very good read!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Steve Powell的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了