THE IMPORTANCE OF BARCODE QUALITY
John Nachtrieb
Founder of Barcode Test LLC | Barcode Quality Expert | Author | Trainer
Barcodes that fail to scan, or scan incorrectly are a nuisance and an expense. But the damage they do goes much deeper. Consider two recent FDA recalls.
Case #1 Novum IQ Syringe Pump
The manufacturer, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, is recalling this device which the FDA identified as a Class 1 recall, a risk of serious injury or death. The problem is a software glitch that causes the pump to incorrectly calculate dosage. The recall includes all serial numbers produced in 2023.
Case #2 Single-Use Syringes
Leakage and an unknown black material inside syringes made by Fresenius Medical Care have led to an FDA Class 1 recall. Almost 12.5 million Sanxin Single User Sterile Syringes were involved.
领英推荐
Here is another situation where the barcode can make a difference.
During the manufacturing process at Medtronic, a quantity of McGrath Mac laryngoscopes failed to pass inspection and were isolated. Unfortunately, they were subsequently stolen. The manufacturer issued a public safety notification, and the FDA issued a Class 1 recall. ?Nearly 6,000 devices were affected.
Why is barcode quality important? The barcode on a medical device identifies not just the product, but the date and place of manufacture, the serial and lot or batch number, the production date and expiration, and a host of other important attributes. If the barcode does not work right, a recall would be much less targeted, and far more disruptive and expensive.
Dangerous, defective products often look identical to products that work perfectly. Only the barcode can identify a recalled product and distinguish it from a valid one, and only if that barcode works right.
While it is true that a barcode verifier seems to be expensive, the larger truth is that they pay for themselves. Barcode verifiers prevent the expense of a broken supply chain and disappointed trading partners. They prevent the potential harm a defective medical device can inflict, and they can even prevent incorrect bedside dosing and the liability of wrongful death. Compared to that, the cost of a barcode verifier is negligible.
Questions or comments? Contact us here. Or download our free Step by Step Guide to Barcode Quality.
U.P.C. Database / Supply Chain Consultant - Grocery Pragmatist, Magician, Rabbi
9 个月I would posit that - in addition to Barcode Quality (and you have covered that subject quite well) - maintaining an accurate Barcode Number, within the Supply Chain, is also of importance. Far too many times, as a Data Provider for Food and Beverage and Beverage Alcohol, I have seen the U.P.C. or EAN in a complete twelve or thirteen or eight digit format, on the Product; but the underlying Supply Chain Data presents that same U.P.C. or EAN as ten, eleven, six, or seven digits. Thus, with a Product Recall, the U.P.C. given to the USDA - for example - is incomplete. This is where, and pardon the pontificating, GS1 fails. Yes, they create, assign, and maintain the Prefix Information, but they provide relatively little in the way of U.P.C. / EAN Creation, Maintenance, etc. Hopefully, key word HOPE, Sunrise 2027 and the Digital Link will address some of this. Until then John, you provide a valuable Service.