Impact Investing vs. ESG Investing: Decoding the Difference

A couple of weeks ago, I had the privilege of speaking at a roundtable organized by Startupbootcamp , centered around the concept of Impact Investing. Amidst the discourse, a pertinent query arose – one that often comes up when discussing sustainable finance: How does Impact Investing differ from ESG Investing? That very moment sparked the inspiration behind this article, where I aim to elucidate the difference between the two, drawing on concrete business examples to make the distinction clearer.

Impact Investing

Impact Investing actively channels funds into ventures that aim to create a positive social or environmental change, alongside a financial return.

• Example: Acumen, a global nonprofit, invests in startups that focus on solving critical social issues. One of their investments, D.light, offers affordable solar energy solutions in regions without reliable electricity. The success of such an investment is not only measured by financial returns but also by the number of households impacted.

Characteristics of Impact Investing:

1. Intentionality: It’s about purposefully aiming to generate a positive, measurable societal or environmental change.
2. Measurable Outcomes: Success is gauged by both financial returns and tangible societal benefits.
3. Diverse Asset Classes: It spans across various asset classes, from equity to debt and more.
4. Range of Returns: While positive societal outcomes are the priority, financial returns, albeit sometimes below market rate, are expected.

ESG Investing

ESG Investing integrates environmental, social, and governance factors into investment decision-making.

• Example: BlackRock, one of the world's largest asset managers, has an ESG-focused fund that invests in companies with strong environmental, social, and governance practices. These companies, like Vestas Wind Systems, a wind turbine company, are chosen based on their adherence to ESG criteria, promising both ethical impact and financial returns.

Characteristics of ESG Investing:

1. Risk Management: ESG factors are believed to impact portfolio performance, and their assessment can pinpoint risks.
2. Comprehensive Integration: ESG aspects are integrated alongside traditional financial metrics.
3. Continuous Engagement: Investors often liaise with companies to encourage improved ESG practices.
4. Positive Screening: It often emphasizes particular ESG themes or companies with robust ESG performances.

Distinguishing the Two:

Both avenues underscore societal good, but their differences lie at the very heart of their existence:

• Purpose and Strategy: While Impact Investing is change-centric, seeking specific societal outcomes, ESG Investing evaluates a company's all-around approach to ESG risks and benefits.
• Measurement: While Impact Investing requires tracking specific societal benefits, ESG investing focuses on a company's holistic ESG practices.
• Return Expectations: Impact investors may sometimes prioritize societal benefits over financial gains, while ESG investors generally seek market-aligned financial returns in addition to societal good.

In conclusion, that roundtable at Startup Bootcamp provided a renewed perspective on the multifaceted realm of sustainable investing. Impact and ESG investing, while distinct, represent a hopeful trajectory for finance – one where economic growth and societal welfare coalesce. It’s an exhilarating time to be in the investment sphere, and I'm thrilled to be part of this evolving narrative.

?

Tony Tiyou?is the founder and CEO of?Renewables in Africa (RiA)?is a Clean Energy Company raising Awareness about Renewable Energy in Africa and across the globe. Have you checked my podcast “Renewables in Action” on?Spotify ,?Apple ,?Buzzsprout ?