The Impact of AI on Law Enforcement, Criminology and Criminal Justice.

Artificial Intelligence is not a replacement for human expertise but rather a powerful tool that enhances the capabilities of law enforcement agencies. AI solutions can assist law enforcement agencies in making decisions and performing tasks. They can improve efficiency, increase data-driven practices, or expand capabilities for specific tasks or decisions; for example, AI applications can assist in determining how many officers an agency needs, where resources should be deployed, and the optimal scheduling strategy for officers. AI solutions hold promise to increase efficiency, promote data-driven practices, and expand capabilities for law enforcement agencies. The challenge will be for law enforcement agencies to identify use cases in which data quality and availability, technology maturity, and ethical constraints match their needs and their communities’ needs. A crucial step of design thinking is to identify how an AI application would support law enforcement (e.g., completing a task or making a decision) and decide the appropriate level of AI involvement, from helping the end user do their job more efficiently to automating the job entirely.? Law enforcement leaders should evaluate both AI and non-AI based solutions to determine which one best meets law enforcement needs. For each decision or task in law enforcement’s daily operations, there is a unique context and set of constraints that must be considered. Although not all tasks are appropriate for AI, these technologies can provide benefits to law enforcement, including cost savings, efficiency improvements, data-driven practices, and enhanced capabilities. Technology is constantly changing and developing. While criminals are harnessing the latest technology to outwit governments and law enforcement agencies, police can use technology not only to keep up but to stay one step ahead. Human errors can have serious consequences in legal practices. AI systems, on the other hand, can process and analyze vast amounts of data with high accuracy, minimizing the risk of errors commonly associated with manual tasks like contract review and data extraction. New technology has transformed the law enforcement industry and the criminal justice system as a whole. Today, police and other law enforcement officials rely on a wide range of technologies to enforce laws and stop crime in a safe and efficient manner. Artificial intelligence, predictive policing, social media forensics, and facial recognition are arming law enforcement with the tools they need to continue fighting crime in a digital era. AI allows forensic labs to detect and process low-level, degraded, or otherwise unviable DNA evidence that could not have been used previously. This includes the ability to detect extremely small amounts of DNA and extract usable DNA from evidence that even predates testing.

Unfortunately, technology has also allowed for individuals to carry out the act of committing crimes right from their homes under anonymity. This is known as cybercrime and can be defined as any online criminal act while using a computer or other electronic devices to cause harm to others. AI's pattern recognition and data processing capabilities allow it to identify crime trends, correlations, and anomalies that may be difficult for human analysts to detect. One of the key benefits of AI-based predictive policing is its ability to identify crime hotspots. By examining historical crime data, AI algorithms can pinpoint areas with a higher likelihood of criminal activity. Many departments are already using technology such as cameras, microphones, and social media monitoring to monitor for threats or violations to local ordinances. Increasingly, AI can automatically analyze the output from those systems (video, audio, and text) to identify ordinance violations or emerging threats. Whether it is identifying trends in criminal behavior or spotting unusual financial transactions, AI algorithms can uncover insights that aid law enforcement in apprehending suspects and preventing future crimes.?Though, the use of AI in law practices raises ethical concerns, including privacy, data protection, bias, and transparency. It is crucial to address these concerns to ensure fairness, protect client information, and mitigate biases in AI algorithms. Interpretation of radiological images to assist medical examiners with establishing causes and manner of death. To predict and recognize anomalous patterns and to learn to recognize new patterns to assist with fraud detection. To predict potential elder abuse victims. AI puts the ‘real-time’ in real-time intelligence – providing RTICs vital information from multiple partners including police, sheriffs, fire, federal agencies or other community services – and giving law enforcement the most accurate, up-to-date information available. In preparation for the Tokyo Olympics, the Japanese police force launched AI-enabled predictive policing. The AI systems are capable of determining whether multiple crimes were committed by the same person by comparing data relating to each crime. Using this information, AI predicts the criminal's next move. The use of AI in advanced military software and technologies can provide safety to soldiers, reduce human labor, and improve decision-making. In terms of safety, humans can delegate dangerous tasks to non-human agents to protect themselves.

One of the primary debates surrounding the ethics of AI in law is the question of bias. AI systems rely on algorithms and machine learning to analyze data and make predictions. However, if the data used to train these systems is biased, the AI can perpetuate that bias, resulting in unfair outcomes. With technology such as cameras, video, and social media generating massive volumes of data, AI could detect crimes that would otherwise go undetected and help ensure greater public safety by investigating potential criminal activity, thus increasing community confidence in law enforcement and the criminal justice. In procedural criminal law, AI can be used as a law enforcement technology, for instance, for predictive policing or as a cyber agent technology. Also the role of AI in evidence (data analytics after search and seizure, Bayesian statistics, developing scenarios) is examined. AI can help identify patterns of criminal activity that might not be immediately apparent to human investigators. On the other hand, there are concerns about bias and the potential for abuse by law enforcement agencies. But one thing is certain: The use of AI in criminal justice is here to stay. As per a survey of criminal justice professionals, 48% believe AI technology will make policing more effective. Only 32% of criminal justice professionals believe AI can reduce racial bias in policing. By leveraging robots for perilous tasks, law enforcement agencies can safeguard the lives of their officers. Robots can navigate dangerous environments, handle hazardous materials, and undertake life-threatening missions, reducing the risks faced by human officers. Ethical concerns is an issue. For example, AI decisions are not always intelligible to humans, AI-based decisions are susceptible to inaccuracies, discriminatory outcomes, embedded or inserted bias and the Surveillance practices for data gathering and privacy of court users. AI-powered analytics can provide actionable insights into human behavior, yet, abusing analytics to manipulate human decisions is ethically wrong. AI can be used to very quickly produce initial drafts, citing the relevant case law, advancing arguments, and rebutting (as well as anticipating) arguments advanced by opposing counsel. Human input will still be needed to produce the final draft, but the process will be much faster with AI. AI offers far-reaching benefits for human development but also presents risks. These include, among others, further division between the privileged and the unprivileged; erosion of individual freedoms through surveillance; and the replacement of independent thought and judgement with automated control. Robots in policing is definitely taking over the inherently risky task of issuing speeding tickets and other traffic stop duties, for example — robots can keep officers safe and eliminate some bias in policing. Virtual Reality VR can provide a safe and controlled environment for officers to practice responding to use of force situations and make mistakes without risk of harm. It can also provide more immersive, realistic training experiences that can improve the retention of training material and skills.

The use of AI in criminal law is especially problematic due to the potential consequences of making liberty-depriving decisions based on an algorithm. Society may trust these algorithms too much and make decisions based on their predictions, even if the technology may not be as “intelligent” as it appears. AI helps in Improving Public Safety. AI-driven predictive policing models have shown promise in helping prevent crimes before they happen. By analyzing historical data on crime patterns and trends, these models can identify high-risk areas where law enforcement resources should be allocated. AI-driven tools will support various policing activities, from facial recognition for suspect identification to analyzing complex regional crime data sets for unseen patterns. AI will also assist in crime prediction, monitoring CCTV feeds, and, increasingly, automating routine tasks like report generation. Virtual reality can provide the type of training needed by today's law enforcement officers by allowing trainees to immerse their senses in a three-dimensional computer-generated environment. Users usually view these computer images through a head- mounted device that restricts their vision to two small video monitors. In addition to facial recognition and DNA, there is an ever-expanding array of biometric (and behavioral) characteristics being utilized by law enforcement and the intelligence community. These include voice recognition, palmprints, wrist veins, iris recognition, gait analysis and even heartbeats.?

Cloud-based computing allows police to access and analyze data quickly and efficiently in many ways. Through cloud computing, officers can access accurate statistics and have real-time dashboards that will monitor entire cities to expedite investigations and allow for better resource planning. Of the reasons cited by respondents, cost routinely stood out as the primary obstacle to the adoption of new technologies for public safety. Upgrades in evidence and digital forensics technology can also assist with the resolution of more advanced and technical crimes. Improved technology and digital forensics allow officers to investigate crimes and locate criminals more efficiently and more quickly. AI helps to catch criminals by carrying out Suspect identification using AI primarily revolves around facial recognition technology, head detection technology, and human-like object detection (HLO) technology. Data from security camera footage, photographic evidence, and person-of-interest databases are processed using intricate machine learning algorithms. AI can automatically analyze the output from those systems (video, audio, and text) to identify ordinance violations or emerging threats. Video analytics software can figure out if there is an active threat in scenes captured by video cameras. Artificial intelligence can help officers write messages and reports and summarize information from both written police reports and public reports. Writing tools can help fine tune messages for specific audiences, making sure the writing is appropriate for a specific educational, gender, or ethnic background. Police departments can use AI-powered recruiting, interview, and assessment tools to identify top talent. Once hired, departments can use technology to help onboard, train, and assess officers. Increasingly, AI makes it possible to provide 1:1 tailored coaching in addition to 1: many classroom-type training, helping each officer work on their unique development areas.?

Police departments around the world are already using image recognition technology to automatically recognize license plates, car makes and models, and even whether a vehicle has had any modifications such as after-market wheels or a ski rack installed. AI are also in widespread use in communities around the world, including predictive analytics that help determine where crime is likely to take place, social media monitoring to monitor flash points in communities, and DNA analysis to establish whether particular people were in contact with specific pieces of evidence or at a particular place. The main difference between a search engine and a chatbot is that a search engine is designed to find information, while a chatbot is designed to have a conversation, answer questions, and solve problems. Officers can start today using chatbots anywhere where they are working with documents such as incident reports or presentations to city offices. AI-powered tools can help you communicate more effectively by writing drafts of your document; creating images, music, or videos to go with your text; or helping to better tailor a presentation to a specific audience. An emerging trend is to feed these generative AI systems specific documents and then enable users to ask questions about those books. You can see an example of this type of technology as Google’s Talk to Books site. You can ask a question such as “When was a convicted killer later exonerated based on new evidence?” and the site will “ask” books in its database for answers. Imagine a system where an AI “ingested” all of the data associated with criminal cases: police reports, depositions, pictures and video evidence, DNA evidence, and so forth—and then detectives and defense attorneys could “ask” the system questions about the data. Technology like this could turn AI into one of the best crime-fighting sidekicks, helping to increase the solve rate and lower the resources needed to apprehend and prosecute criminals. AI systems embedded in smart glasses or smart contact lenses will create an augmented reality overlay over real-world scenes, identifying objects (buildings, cars), scenes for threat and at the same times scanning through historical data for crimes reported for the location. AI systems will help solve crimes by making it easier to gather, analyze, and act on evidence. Detectives will be able to ask their AI assistants questions (e.g., How persuasive would this piece of evidence be in a trial? Based on similar cases in the past, what else should I ask this informant?) and give instructions (e.g., Help me prioritize the next leads to pursue; Show all the suspects and their motives and opportunities). AI systems will help officers listen to and communicate with people in the public with knowledge and empathy. Chatbots have already been rated more useful and empathic than human doctors; similar technology will be adapted to public information officers.?

Police forces worldwide have lamented the amount of paperwork officers have to complete following incidents they attend. Creating and updating case files keeps officers off the streets and can compromise the safety of citizens. AI can help by automatically capturing the required data, thus minimizing the time officers devote to reporting. Officers may have to review and annotate the data that has been collected, but they will likely spend much less time than they would have needed to complete the entire process by hand. Recording data through AI technology and fact-checking it afterward not only reduces the amount of time required. It also helps minimize the potential for human can groupfacilitate the investigative process and the tracking of offenders, including biometric information about numerous suspects, such as their faces, voices, blood , and fingerprints. Investigation officers can be efficiently instructed on proper investigation techniques using AI-based technologies, which lessens the chance of procedural mistakes by officers. Additionally, it is possible to establish a digital database powered by AI with information on offenses, methods, and related offenses in various locations. By communicating with data about place and time, AI programming and big data can aid in pinpointing crime hotspots. AI-based approaches can reduce latency and make the trial process easier. AI can describe or precisely define the content of legal paperwork, helping judges issue these temporary orders quickly. Data pattern analysis could be utilized to thwart, weaken, and prosecute illegal activity. Algorithms may also aid criminal justice professionals in protecting the public in ways that have never before been thought possible by preventing victims and potential offenders from becoming criminals. AI technology can give law enforcement situational awareness and context, improving police well-being by enabling them to make more educated decisions in potentially risky situations. Robotics and drone technology have the potential to perform surveillance for public safety, be incorporated into larger public safety systems, and offer a safe alternative to putting the public and law enforcement in danger. Robotics and drones may also be used for recovery, to gather necessary intelligence, and to support criminal justice experts in ways that have not yet been planned. This resource is used in tracking illegal child images before they are circulated between pedophiles. Dubai Police have been able to boast of a robot capable of patrolling and identifying criminal activity in the city ever since 2017. The Asian country government announced that this robot policeman can identify different human expressions and feelings, such as happiness, anger or sadness, which allows it to approach or greet citizens or visitors in different ways. The Robocop is capable of speaking between 6-9 different languages (depending on sources), so all tourists can have their doubts solved without confusion or misunderstanding. Dubai’s government is also planning to have 25% of its police substituted by unarmed robots by 2030 to help identify criminals, collect evidence and avoid criminal activity in the region. Artificial intelligence machine learning has opened many doors for law enforcement involved in human trafficking investigations. The University of Nottingham conducted a study to show the potential use of machine learning. They effectively mapped labor abuses in the Brick Belt, an area of land extending across Pakistan, northern India, Nepal, and Bangladesh. The Brick Belt is known to be a location of extreme labor exploitation. With artificial intelligence, researchers were able to train the program to recognize sizes, shapes, and shadows normally associated with brick kilns. Additional researchers developed an artificial intelligence engine that could help reveal the location of sex trafficking victims. The AI system identifies hotels based on a database containing approximately one million images of thousands of hotels from around the world. Images of victims are compared to those contained in the database to pick out the location of the hotel room shown in the image. This AI system uses furniture, color schemes, wall art, and bedding to help identify the hotel. ?

Few of the AI tools developed specifically for police are PredPol — PredPol is a predictive policing software that uses machine learning algorithms to analyze historical crime data and predict where future crimes are likely to occur. It helps police departments allocate resources more effectively and prevent criminal activity. ShotSpotter — ShotSpotter is an AI-based gunshot detection system. It uses acoustic sensors to detect and locate the source of gunshots in real time, providing valuable information to law enforcement for rapid response and crime investigation. BriefCam — BriefCam is a video analytics platform that employs AI algorithms for video surveillance analysis. It can process vast amounts of video footage and extract relevant information, such as people, objects, and events, making it easier for investigators to search for specific details. Palantir Gotham — Palantir Gotham is a data integration and analysis platform widely used by law enforcement agencies. It allows for the aggregation and analysis of diverse data sets, enabling investigators to uncover patterns and connections between individuals, events, and locations. NEC NeoFace — NEC NeoFace is a facial recognition software that provides high accuracy in identifying individuals from images or video footage. It has been used by law enforcement agencies to aid in investigations and enhance security measures. IBM i2 — IBM i2 is an intelligence analysis platform that combines data from various sources, including social media, law enforcement databases, and public records. It helps investigators analyze complex data sets and generate actionable intelligence. Palantir Foundry — Palantir Foundry is a data integration and analytics platform that enables law enforcement agencies to integrate, analyze, and visualize large amounts of data from diverse sources. It helps in identifying patterns, making connections, and conducting comprehensive investigations. Speechify — Speechify is a valuable text to speech tool that can convert written documents, such as incident reports or legal documents, into natural-sounding audio, allowing officers to listen to important information quicker or while on the go.?

??

With the dawn of artificial intelligence (AI), a slew of new machine learning tools promise to help protect us—quickly and precisely tracking those who may commit a crime before it happens—through data. The tools themselves, however, present a problem: The data being used to “teach” the software systems is embedded with bias, and only serves to reinforce inequality in many cases. Black people are more likely than white people to be reported for a crime—whether the reporter is white or Black. This leads to Black neighborhoods being marked as “high risk” at a disproportionate rate.? If they know where the most crime happens, the thinking went, police could put more resources into policing a given area. The logic is faulty. If more police are dispatched to a certain neighborhood, it clearly follows that “more” crime will appear here. When machine learning algorithms are fed this “data” to train their predictive systems, they replicate this bias, reinforcing false ideas about which neighborhoods are more “high risk.” Another problem with thinking is that it relies on past information. While our past may give us a clue into future behavior, it does not take into consideration the concept of and potential for rehabilitation, and has the effect of reinforcing negative views, and continuing to punish those who have already paid their debt. From the moment a police officer wrongly identifies a suspect until the moment the officer realizes their error, significant coercive action can take place. The suspect can be arrested, brought to a police station and detained. It can be terrifying, with irreversible consequences, including human rights violations.? Facial recognition systems have also demonstrated bias against people of color. Automated systems remove human oversight. As law enforcement agencies increasingly rely on these deep learning tools, the tools themselves take on an authority, which deserves to be questioned. A number of concerns have been raised about law enforcement use of AI, including whether its use perpetuates biases; one criticism is that the data on which the software are trained contain bias, thus training bias into the AI systems. Another concern is whether reliance on AI technology may lead police to ignore contradictory evidence. Policymakers may consider increased oversight over police use of AI systems to help evaluate and alleviate some of the shortcomings. Whether it is about sensors, CCTVs, digital contact tracing, it is very important for us to be sensitive to how people feel about the data collection and data use, and we must communicate and be very clear about what we are doing.?Another critical consideration is accountability when AI systems fail or produce unintended consequences. Determining responsibility for actions taken by AI algorithms requires clear guidelines and frameworks to avoid potential harm to individuals or communities. This racial profiling is not only detrimental to the targeted individuals and communities but also to the society as a whole. It poses a moral obligation for us to address these biases. The erosion of trust in law enforcement agencies and professionals is a significant concern, leading to a social divide and impeding the maintenance of public order and safety. The undermining of civil rights through unjust identification of people can have profound legal implications. One way to tackle these issues is by refining AI algorithms and making use of more diversified datasets. Often, the biases in AI outputs are a reflection of the skewed data they are trained on. By ensuring that the data is representative of all racial, ethnic, and demographic groups, we can create more equitable AI tools. Similarly, developing better algorithms that are specifically designed to check and control for bias can help enhance the fairness of AI applications in policing. ?

As the costs of ALPR systems have decreased, both law enforcement and private companies have found new uses for this surveillance tool. From creating “virtual fences” to pinpoint which vehicles enter and exit a geographical boundary or jurisdiction, to automating the issuing of tickets for red light violations, ALPRs are one of the most widely used implementations of machine vision in law enforcement today. AI-enabled hardware is being used in new law enforcement use cases like real-time facial recognition in large public places and real-time weapons detection. AI may end up playing an important role in mitigating unconscious bias toward individuals within the criminal justice system. This involves the use of AI’s redaction capabilities to combat any potential bias by modifying police narratives to automatically redact the race and other background characteristics of suspects and victims. The goal is to allow prosecutors to make charging decisions in cases without potentially engaging in biased decision-making. Law enforcement has access to systems that detect, record, and locate gunshots. Local law enforcement agencies in over 100 cities have already adopted acoustic gunshot detectors, such as ShotSpotter; however, startups like Aegis have incorporated AI into these systems by using visual gun recognition to detect gunshots before they are fired. The nonprofit startup Thorn is using Amazon’s facial recognition technology (FRT) to scan internet ads and the dark web for pictures of known missing children. Thorn’s use of AI highlights how systems can enhance, rather than replace, traditional policing practices. After trafficked children are identified and located, traditional policing practices must still be used to capture offenders or rescue victims. AIs areAIs are being used to identify and disrupt child pornography supply chains and apprehend child predators. In collaboration with Thorn and other organizations, Microsoft has developed its Project Artemis tool. Project Artemis identifies communication patterns that predators use in online chat rooms to prey and target children. Additionally, other consumer-oriented internet monitoring companies have extended their impact by partnering with law enforcement agencies to identify child predators. More and more police agencies are seeking AI-driven solutions for video redaction. Companies like Microsoft, various academics, and other technology vendors are actively developing video redaction solutions either by regulation or by choice, identifying information is redacted from police body cam footage prior to releasing the footage to the public. Some states even specify timelines for the public release of body cam recordings. All these become possible with the use of AI. Automatic speech recognition (ASR) software improves the quality of law enforcement reporting and increases reporting efficiency. Instead of typing a report narrative, law enforcement officers are adopting voice-to-text dictation tools to expedite the reporting process and eliminate human errors. Law enforcement and emergency medical services (EMS) agencies can use CAD systems to capture data from incoming calls, inform resource deployment decisions, or assist with reporting. Integrating AI in CAD systems can lead to optimized resource allocation, as well as time and cost savings given the potential of AI systems to analyze historic data, make predictions, inform decisions, and automate workflows. In addition, AI could enable a CAD system to learn and adapt its recommendations in real time. AI is used to augment place-based and individual-based predictive policing models. Place-based predictive policing uses information to identify specific areas (at specific times) that are at an increased risk of crime and/or disorder. Individual-based predictive policing uses information about a person—such as their involvement with the criminal justice system—to identify individuals at risk of being involved, either as a victim or an offender, in future incidents of law enforcement interest. Machine learning is being used to improve homicide investigations and case clearance rates.?There is a team that is applying machine learning to an extensive homicide database that includes optically scanned information from over 6,000 “Murder Books” that cover a 21-year period (1990-2010) to determine predictors of clearance and conviction rates for homicides and shootings and measure the degree to which predictors of gun homicide and shooting incidents are similar and different. The team intends to test and evaluate an investigative tool based on deep learning algorithms.?

?Another important aspect of AI for enforcement usage is the ability to predict emergent suspicious and criminal behavior across a network of cameras. This work also concentrates on using clothing, skeletal structure, movement, and direction prediction to identify and reacquire people of interest across multiple cameras and images. AI can also benefit the law enforcement community from a scientific and evidence processing standpoint. This is particularly true in forensic DNA testing. Biological material, such as blood, saliva, semen, and skin cells, can be transferred through contact with people and objects during the commission of a crime. As DNA technology has advanced, so has the sensitivity of DNA analysis, allowing forensic scientists to detect and process low-level, degraded, or otherwise unviable DNA evidence that could not have been used previously. Law enforcement agencies, are using AI tools in collecting social media information—including Facebook posts, emojis, friends–and analyzing them to make connections, even cross-referencing this information with private data, to create a “holistic” profile that can be used to find people who pose “risks.” AI is used to analyze IP addresses, phone numbers, text etc to ultimately determine the physical location of the suspect. Apart from recording an actual image, most of these software applications also collect biometric data. Biometric information allows for more accurate identification. There are some challenges with facial recognition technology but they can be augmented with biometric information to bolster their accuracy. Worldwide, law enforcement units use facial recognition technology to locate wanted individuals more easily, Identify people featured in images with less risk of false positives, establish the identity of injured or unconscious victims in traffic accidents, retrospectively confirm a person’s identity and cross-check it against existing databases. Sharing information often means accessing different databases and comparing their contents , done by a single officer or even a team of officers, this would take hours, if not days. AI, on the other hand, can easily cross-reference the contents of several databases and share its conclusions. Smart knowledge sharing of this type benefits each of the involved police forces and law enforcement agencies. Deep learning, a subset of artificial intelligence (AI), is poised to redefine forensics in law enforcement, offering tools and techniques to streamline and enhance the identification and interpretation of physical evidence. Deep learning is also being applied to the analysis of crime scene photos and videos. Through the use of neural networks, these tools can highlight minute details that might be overlooked by human eyes, such as hidden weapons or subtle signs of struggle. These technological advancements in forensics not only accelerate the process of collecting and analyzing evidence but also greatly reduce the potential for human error. AI’s integration into forensics represents a significant leap forward for law enforcement, providing them with sophisticated tools to enhance their crime-solving capabilities.?

??

Police and financial intelligence units can visually track and trace cryptocurrency transactions across several different blockchains through the company’s visualization engine, Qualitative Law Enforcement Unified Edge (QLUE). This visual, interactive, and intuitive interface helps investigators follow a money trail by identifying anomalies and bringing them to a user’s attention. Many criminals have histories across counties and states, but most law enforcement agencies can only access their own records. One solution to this problem is to unify and standardize data across multiple agencies, giving law enforcement easy access to a suspect’s complete criminal history. These state-owned centralization bodies fuse intelligence from across different agencies that include state, local, tribal, federal, and private sector partners. Using AI can accelerate data cleaning and consolidation at scale. The same auto-correct technology that most people use daily while typing or texting can be leveraged to increase the accuracy of suspect input and report writing — a typo may be the difference between finding a lead from years prior and letting a case go unsolved. Data fusion also unlocks more powerful AI-driven insights. The more data machine learning models have access to, the better the predictions. Having more data to learn from can help the system identify more complex patterns and relationships, which feeds into more informed policing. AI-backed tool can be used to?analyze a victim’s cell phone. Drawing data from the mobile device, Artificial Intelligence can highlight communication patterns and index the objects captured in the victim’s photos, making data collection and interpretation more manageable for identifying suspects and understanding events. By processing video and breaking it down into objects and behaviors that appeared, VCA enables law enforcement to search through more video evidence more efficiently, achieving results while dedicating fewer officers to video investigation. Over time, law enforcement agencies often lose officers due to a change in staffing or retirement. As agencies continue hiring new officers, they can replace the presence in the community, but there is a gap in knowledge and experience. Research suggests that using AI and ML in policing has already begun to bridge the gap, with facial recognition being one example. Inexperienced officers may make rash decisions, escalating a situation into a violent encounter, which might be avoided with the insight and experience AI could provide. AI also has a significant use in courts of law. Another application of AI is predictive justice, which is the statistical analysis of a large amount of case law data – mainly previously rendered court decisions – to predict court outcomes. This can help judges focus their time on cases for which their expertise has a higher added value. In the long term it can strengthen justice stability worldwide by offering economic players more harmonised court decisions, therefore helping better anticipation. AI can also predict recidivism by analysing hundreds of thousands of criminal justice-related data to predict new offences of absconding offenders. Such AI application can be very useful for practitioners in warrants services, increasing fines recovery and allowing a more optimised resources allocation which, in the long term, helps the aim for swifter wheels of justice. Around the world, criminal justice uses different resources such as IT technology to limit felonies and crimes.?

Conclusion: Advancement in technical capabilities will continue and despite those obvious benefits of AI when it comes to keeping citizens safe, the technology is not free from controversy. The criminal justice community faces shrinking budgets and a growing sense of mistrust from the community. With these things in mind—and considering ethical appropriateness, technical feasibility, and operational limitations—AI provides important opportunities to improve the criminal justice system. Opportunities to implement AI tools should be met with a clear understanding of the data requirement and use a design thinking approach to evaluating potential use cases. With technology such as cameras, video, and social media generating massive volumes of data, AI could detect crimes that would otherwise go undetected and help ensure greater public safety by investigating potential criminal activity, thus increasing community confidence in law enforcement and the criminal justice system. AI also has the potential to assist the nation’s crime laboratories in areas such as complex DNA mixture analysis. By using AI and predictive policing analytics integrated with computer-aided response and live public safety video enterprises, law enforcement will be better able to respond to incidents, prevent threats, stage interventions, divert resources, and investigate and analyze criminal activity. AI should never replace human judgement and the final responsibility for the accuracy and quality of the outputs and the decisions taken must rest with individual law enforcement officers who have the necessary training and expertise. Like all AI applications, AI provides no guarantee of the accuracy of results, and indeed, all algorithms provide only likelihood of correctness as part of accuracy guidelines. It is also important to understand that AI tools are not foolproof, and we must not place more value on the AI than is warranted – which can pose ethical challenges in itself. While these advancements hold great promise for enhancing public safety and improving criminal justice outcomes, they must be approached with careful consideration of ethical implications. By ensuring transparency, addressing biases, and establishing accountability measures, we can maximize the potential benefits of incorporating AI into law enforcement operations while upholding fairness and justice in our society. AI is merely a tool, and since a tool is only as good as its user, it is important to evaluate potential negative externalities of AI uses in criminal justice, to avoid any counterproductive consequences such as bias and errors.?

??

References:?

https://www.policechiefmagazine.org/exploring-ai-law-enforcement-interview/?

https://cjtec.org/files/5f5f94aa4c69b?

https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/252038.pdf?

https://www.aiplusinfo.com/blog/artificial-intelligence-ai-and-policing/?

https://www.techuk.org/resource/police-use-of-ai-a-force-for-good-or-a-public-threat.html?

https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificial-intelligence-and-policing-in-australia/?

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/656295/IPOL_STU(2020)656295_EN.pdf?

https://www.forbesindia.com/article/isbinsight/need-for-responsible-ai-in-policing-and-crime-detection/86965/1?

??

??

??

?