IFRS 15 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Majd Kousa
Tax Accountant at IBS Consultancy | ? IFRS & IFRS for SMEs | ? UAE VAT & Corporate Tax
Overview:
Revenue from Contracts with Customers was introduced by the International Accounting Standards Board to provide one comprehensive revenue recognition model for all contracts with customers to improve comparability within industries.
Five Steps Approach:
Identifying the performance obligation:
What is performance obligation?, it’s a promise to the customer to transfer:
Note: Sometimes the obligations can implicit, the contract obligation is not limited to the articles mentioned on the contract, also it includes those implied by an entity's customary business practices. Example: a maintenance service historically provided, but no mentioned in the contract.
What is distinct good or service? The following criteria should be met:
Factors indicate that the goods and services transferred to the customer are not separately identifiable:
Note: In all cases above, the entity may end up accounting thereof as a single performance obligation.
Examples of distinct goods and services:
1. Sale of a Laptop with Software Installation
2. Construction Contract for a Building with Design Services
3. Car Purchase with a Separate Maintenance Package
4. Sale of a Smartphone with a Monthly Data Plan
Material Right:
Sometimes the vendor provides the client with an option to acquire additional goods or services which he won't receive without having signed the contract. These goods and services herby are paid in advance when entering the contract, and accounted as separate performance obligation. when are these items not identified as a single performance obligation?
Example: ABC company provided XYZ with a promotional discount of a contract of 60% discount if the latter entered the contract only. However, the company provided meanwhile 10% discount over all season sales on its services.
The situation here states that XYZ will get 60% on its contract including 10% already because of the general discount. Therefore, only 50% discount is solely considered as a separate performance obligation and 10% is ignored.
Treatment: The situation here states that XYZ will get 60% on its contract including 10% already because of the general discount. Therefore, only 50% discount is solely considered as a separate performance obligation and 10% is ignored.
Determine the transaction price:
The transaction price is the amount of consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for transfer goods or services to a customer, excluding amounts collected for third parties (e.g. Taxes).
It consists of: Amount Expected to be entitled, Impairment Loss, other consideration.
Variable Consideration: Consideration is variable if the amount to which the entity is entitled is contingent on the occurrence or none of a future event. and it's determined by using two approaches:
1- Expected value approach: works well when the entity has an experience and large number of similar contracts.
2 - Most likely approach: it's suitable when the entity has options of two scenarios or outcomes to meet the obligation or not.
Reversal Revenue:
The likely hood of the reversal revenue is affected by several factors:
Note: When the entity faces these constraints, it should be assessing if it's appropriate to include part of the variable consideration like a lower amount. Then determining the amount of variable consideration.
Significant Financing Component:
an entity should assess whether a contract contains a significant financing component by:
a) The difference between the amount of promised consideration and the cash selling price of the promised goods or services.
b) The combined effect of:
- The expected length of time between transfer of the promised goods or services and the payment.
- The prevailing interest rates in the relevant market.
The company should adjust the transaction price of the contract for a significant financing component unless the following conditions are met:
Factors that indicate that there is not significant financing component:
Where to imply a significant financing component?
Accounting for Significant Financing Component:
When recognizing the financing component, entity should adjust the transaction price according to the discount rate implied. After contract inception, entity should not update the discount rate to re-adjust the transaction price for the changes in interest rates or other circumstances. An entity should present the effects of financing component separately from contracts with customers as interest expense or interest income in the income statement.
Note: in case of non-cash consideration receivable in exchange to the service provided, these considerations are measured by their fair-value, rather if not possible to access to their fair-value, they are measured by their stand-alone selling price of the goods and services provided to the client.
Allocation of transaction price:
A company should allocate the transaction price over its performance obligation on a relative stand-alone-selling price basis except for allocating discounts and variable consideration.
How to determine the stand-alone selling price?
Allocation of variable consideration:
An entity should allocate variable consideration entirely to a performance obligation if both of the following criteria are met:
1- The term of a variable payment relate specifically to the entity's efforts to satisfy that performance obligation; and
2- Allocating the variable consideration entirely to that performance obligation would depict the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in satisfying that performance obligation when considering all of the performance obligations and payment terms in the contract.
Variable consideration refers to amounts in a contract that can change due to discounts, incentives, penalties, or bonuses. IFRS 15 requires an entity to allocate transaction prices to performance obligations based on their relative standalone selling prices, but in some cases, variable consideration can be allocated entirely to one performance obligation if certain criteria are met.
Criteria for Allocating Variable Consideration to a Single Performance Obligation:
An entity can allocate variable consideration entirely to a specific performance obligation if both of the following criteria are satisfied:
领英推荐
Why Is This Important?
Include variable Consideration in the transaction price:
An amount of variable consideration should be included in the transaction price only to the extent that it is highly probable that there will not be a significant revenue reversal when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is resolved.
This means:
Subsequent change in transaction price:
The entity should update the transaction price at each reporting date, including an assessment of any constrained amount of a variable consideration.
Any changes in the transaction price should be allocated to the performance obligations in the contract on the same basis as at contract inception, and:
1- Amount allocated to a satisfied (POs) should be recognized as revenue in the period of the price change.
2- Amount allocated to an unsatisfied performance obligation should be recognized as revenue when the related POs related is satisfied.
3- An entity should re-allocate the transaction price to reflect changes in stand-alone prices after contract inception.
4- An entity should update the estimated transaction price at each reporting date, including an assessment of any constrained amount of variable consideration that may be included in the transaction price.
5- A change in the transaction price should be allocated entirely to one or more distinct goods or services based on same criteria as allocation variable consideration entirely to one or more distinct goods or services.
Recognize Revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.
The context of revenue recognition will be:
Seller’s performance creates or enhances asset controlled by customer
In determining whether a customer controls an asset as it is created or enhanced, an entity should apply the requirements for control in paragraphs 31 - 34 and 38 of IFRS 15, which includes considering whether the entity can:
The asset that is being created or enhanced (for example, a work-in-progress asset) could be either tangible or intangible.
Performance Obligation satisfied overtime:
An entity transfers control of a good or service over time and therefore satisfies a performance obligation and recognizes revenue over time if any of the three criteria are met:
Performance Obligation satisfied at a point of time:
to determine the point of time, the entity should determine when the customer obtains control of a promised assets. that is determined by:
1- Present Right to payment.
2- Legal right, when the customer has a legal title for the asset, and the entity has a protective right.
3- the entity has a physical possession. (the goods have been transferred to the client).
4- the customer has a significant risk and rewards of ownership of the asset.
5- Customers has accepted the asset.
Note: Measuring progress towards completion of a performance obligation that is satisfied over time based on the outcome, performance obligation, transfer of control.
Output and Input methods:
Output method:
Direct measurements of the value of the goods and services transferred to date.
Input method:
Indirect measurement based on the inputs used to date relative to the total expected inputs to satisfy that performance obligation.
Note: Adjustment to the measure of progress may be required when:
a) The cost incurred does not contribute to the entity's progress in satisfying the performance obligation.
b) The cost incurred is not proportionate to the entity's progress in satisfying the performance obligation. In those circumstances, the best depiction of the entity's performance may be, for example, to recognize revenue at an amount equal to the cost of a good transferred if the following conditions are met at contract inception:
1. The good is not distinct.
2. The customer obtains control of the good significantly before receiving services related to the good.
3. The cost of the good is significant relative to the total expected costs to complete the performance obligation.
4. The entity procures the good from another entity and is not significantly involved in designing and manufacturing the good.
Contract Costs:
Contract costs can be capitalized or (incremental) not capitalized depending on the effect of them on the contract.
Incremental costs of obtaining a contract:
When to capitalize the contract's costs?
Costs to fulfill a contract:
Entity should capitalize its incurred costs if All of the following criteria are met:
a) when the costs relate directly to a contract or anticipated contract that the entity can specifically identify (costs relating to services to be provided under renewal of an existing contract or costs of designing an asset to be transferred under a specific contract that hasn't been yet approved. They include the following:
b) The costs generate or enhance resources of the entity that will be used in satisfying performance obligation in the future.
c) The costs are expected to be recovered.
Costs to expense:
Any cost doesn't relate directly to the contract or relate to performance obligations previously had been satisfied. or undistinguishable costs whether they are related or not or partially to satisfied performance obligation.
Incremental costs of obtaining a contract:
1- should be recognized as an asset if the company expects to recover them.
2- As a practical expedient, the amortization period of these costs if capitalized should be one year or less.
3- Costs to obtain the contract that would have been incurred regardless of whether the contract existed should be recognized as expenses, unless the contract says the contrast.
References:
Deloitte: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en.html