"I’d Lay My Life Down For My Country, But Not For My Program"
Lace up. It's go time.

"I’d Lay My Life Down For My Country, But Not For My Program"

Here’s what I don’t understand: Warfighters are brave enough to sacrifice their life for this country, but not brave enough to shake up their department?

General and flag officers: Is your career trajectory worth more than America’s ability to achieve full military power potential? Didn’t you swear to put country first?


  • Putting country first means PMs of duplicative or failing programs put them on the chopping block instead of seeking continued funding.


  • ?Putting country first means equipping warfighters with the best technology. Not the one with the slickest marketing. Not the one your former shipmate is selling you. Not the one you bought last year.

?

  • Putting country first means a hard look in the mirror: Non-tech leaders in technical positions step down if you are not qualified. But not before you transfer your unqualified subordinates into more suitable positions.

?

  • Putting country first means letting go of your rice bowl and pet rock to focus on what the country needs, not what you want.


Individual inactions accrue and the DoD-wide aversion to risk is perpetuating a status-quo with scarce innovation adoption, ridiculous bureaucracy, fiscal waste, mediocre leadership, and a lack of technical and strategy expertise where it’s most required.

The country cannot afford to continue like this. With a three-front war an imminent possibility, there is nothing more urgent than preparation.

What's standing in the DoD's way? The DoD.

Who's brave enough to fix it?


PS. Please don't start with another study or commission. Just do the thing.

Philip Niedermair “The price of Liberty is eternal vigilance.”

Chairman of the Advisory Board TAC, Special Advisor VIRSEC, Chair of the Advisory Board NCG National Cyber Group, Managing Partner Modirum Defense, Senior Advisor Cyberspace Solarium Commission

7 个月

Gentry Lane you a beacon of truth on this matter so vital to our defense and liberty. Thank you!

Jill Long, PhD

Creating Strategic Emergence | PhD in Political Science | Senior Professor Strategic Leadership Studies

7 个月

Gentry my friend, you have a way with words. I love the directness of your posts and how you raise the tough issues from the morass to the level of discourse. Acknowledging that there are those who walk the "compliant path" and avoid conflict, there are many others who rage within the system to make it better. I offer a counterpoint to make it a bit spicier. Perhaps it is the leaders within the policy system which needs to change, the ones where they implemented procurement rules that lead us (by regulatory guidance) to the useless single ply TP, ridiculous entry barriers and beauracratic apathy that results in processes that makes the ice age seem like a NSCAR race. Every democratic system I've examined has similar issues, they choose regulation to impose ethical standards versus simply applying the leadership competency of holding people accountable. I agree this is a leadership issue. I do not think the full proponderence of weight is borne by our military leaders. There is a system of systems that they, and right minded policy makers, are pushing to change. I think the question we should be asking is how 'we the people' can help them make the necessary changes. Thanks for the excellent food for thought.

Bob Johnson, PMP

Collaborative leader, relationship builder and problem solver.

7 个月

Love this! Bravery does not just occur on the battlefield.

Here’s an old Infantry man’s description of fiscal waste. Did you know the DoD purchases single ply toilet paper to save money?This is by far the sh*tiest toilet paper one has ever used (see what I did there). However, someone please raise their hand if that single ply ever got the job done in one swipe?! Nope, it takes multiple layers to execute flawlessly. In the end, you are most likely utilizing more resources than the GOV initially intended, which costs as much as buying the better stuff anyways. But somewhere, somehow, some PhD logistician thought this would save money. Maybe we could truely save money if we went european style :)

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Gentry Lane的更多文章

  • CONDITION vs. CONFLICT

    CONDITION vs. CONFLICT

    Is relentless cyber aggression on American companies a condition that needs to be managed or an adversary invasion that…

    3 条评论
  • HARMING THE HEGEMON

    HARMING THE HEGEMON

    Will the genius who created this meme please come forward for due attribution. Thanks How Loopholes & Lack of Strategy…

    8 条评论
  • Choosing Battles in a Multi-Front War.

    Choosing Battles in a Multi-Front War.

    Fed up with the volatility and shifting borders in central Europe, rise of autocracy and encroaching antisemitism in…

    9 条评论
  • US Manufacturing: Once a Strength, Now a Liability

    US Manufacturing: Once a Strength, Now a Liability

    Not since WWII has private industry carried such outsized influence on national security strategy and policy. Now more…

  • Buyer Beware

    Buyer Beware

    And be smarter, too. My big takeaway from the CrowdStrike Catastrophe: People buy cybersecurity software without…

    11 条评论
  • CYBERSECURITY’S COME TO JESUS MOMENT

    CYBERSECURITY’S COME TO JESUS MOMENT

    AND THE INEVITABLE CAPITULATION OF CYBERSPACE Thank God the CrowdStrike security event didn’t happen during a national…

    29 条评论
  • Ceci n'est pas une cybersecurity company

    Ceci n'est pas une cybersecurity company

    Defending democracy is a pointless goal. No battle was ever won by defense alone, so defending democracy is a…

    6 条评论
  • 1938 or 1939?

    1938 or 1939?

    I just returned from 6 weeks in 7 European countries meeting with 8 national cyber directors, warfighters, NATO…

    34 条评论
  • Countercyberspace Operations

    Countercyberspace Operations

    Harrowing Truth About the Current Condition A well-known fact: Civilian critical infrastructure companies comprise the…

    16 条评论
  • The World is a Tinderbox and Putin is Playing with Matches

    The World is a Tinderbox and Putin is Playing with Matches

    The timing of two recent events scares the hell out of me. During an interview, Putin said that Russia would “invade…

    7 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了