The IBC: A Well-Intentioned Failure

India's Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), a bold stride towards a comprehensive insolvency framework, has, ironically, become a labyrinth of despair for entrepreneurs. While it was designed to balance the interests of investors and borrowers, its execution has transformed it into a tool of oppression rather than recovery.

At the heart of the issue lies the valuation process. Mandated twice—for fair value and liquidation value—these valuations seem superfluous given the company's eventual fate: sale or liquidation. The process becomes a costly and time-consuming formality, draining resources from an already struggling entity.

The initial intent of valuation was likely twofold: to prevent asset erosion by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and to provide a fair exit value for the entrepreneur. However, the code fails to operationalize either. The absence of a direct correlation between valuation and subsequent proceedings has far-reaching implications.

Without a valuation-based benchmark, the entrepreneur is unfairly burdened with the entire debt, irrespective of the company's actual worth. This disproportionate liability, often coupled with aggressive creditor tactics, can lead to immense mental anguish and, in extreme cases, even suicide.

The valuation should be the cornerstone of the insolvency process. It should determine the recoverable debt and halt interest accrual. This would simplify calculations and reduce the scope for arbitrary decisions. Additionally, forensic audits, fraud investigations, and defaulter declarations should be linked to these valuations, streamlining the process and minimizing harassment.

The IBC, in its current form, is a system in crisis. It has morphed into a mechanism that punishes entrepreneurs rather than provides a path to recovery. To salvage its purpose, a radical overhaul is imperative. The valuation process needs teeth, and the entrepreneur must be afforded a fair chance at redemption.

Having personally experienced the harrowing ordeal of insolvency, I can attest to the human cost of these systemic failures. My experience is a stark reminder of the urgent need for reform. The IBC must evolve to prioritize the entrepreneur's dignity and the sanctity of human life over mere financial considerations.

Only then can India genuinely claim to have a bankruptcy code that fosters entrepreneurship and economic growth. It is time to transform the IBC from a tool of oppression to a platform for revival.

The Human Cost

The IBC, in its current avatar, is not just a legal framework; it is a human tragedy waiting to happen. The psychological toll on entrepreneurs facing insolvency is immense. The fear of losing everything, the constant pressure from creditors, and the uncertainty of the future can be overwhelming.

When the valuation process becomes a mere formality, it exacerbates the entrepreneur's despair. It is as if their life's work is being systematically undervalued while creditors circle like vultures. This impacts the individual and ripples through families, employees, and the broader community.

Moreover, the aggressive tactics employed by creditors can be emotionally devastating. Threats, harassment, and public shaming are not uncommon. These actions can erode an individual's self-esteem and leave them utterly defeated.

The IBC must recognize the human element in insolvency. It should be designed to provide support and rehabilitation, not just liquidation. A mental health support system for distressed entrepreneurs should be integral to insolvency.

#Entrepreneurship #IBC #IBBI #insolvency