I can see clearly now

I can see clearly now

One of the joys that came my way from serving many years in the research trenches around the world was having a front row seat to four decades of consumer product and service history. Across hundreds of investigations of all sizes and shapes, I got to see up close how decisions got made and how things evolved over time. When we look back at things we now take for granted, we can easily see how we got to where we are today. Here's a tale from our archives about how one company nearly upended an industry but didn't because they shot the messenger.

Once upon a time, bottled water was a commodity sold mostly in frosted plastic gallon jugs exactly like the ones milk came in. It was a cutthroat business with razor-thin margins and no real differentiation between products. The brands that sold the most were whichever ones were on sale. Looking for an edge where there was none, a beverage company executive asked us to see what we could learn about bottled water consumers' perceptions and behaviors.

In what later became an MBA school case study, we found bottled water buyers scoffed at the security blankets industry insiders clung to so dearly.

<Sidebar: This disease - thinking from the inside-out - afflicts insiders across every product and service category I have ever studied. The most stunning visual example of inside-out thinking was the company that installed the giant logosculpture at their headquarters so that it would appear correct to those inside the building, but backwards to visitors and on the cover of their annual report.>

Saddled with the myopia of experts, our bottled water industry insider clients told us the words distilled, purified, and ionized said "purity" to consumers. They were shocked when they listened from behind the mirror as one study subject after another told us those words were nothing more than cheap tricks companies were using to avoid saying “treated tap water.” When we asked how they would define purity, bottled water buyers told us a different story. They said you could tell water was pure when it was completely clear and had no visual imperfections.

You can see through it! 

We suggested the client could shake up the industry and gain first-mover advantage by packaging their water in clear bottles so consumers could see the purity for themselves. Their reaction? They raged at our ignorance and stupidity for recommending they spend the unheard of and exorbitant sum of five cents a bottle for clear plastic and threw us out of their office, infuriated at having wasted their research dollars on outsiders who had clearly failed to properly understand how the business worked.

Twenty years after our simple finding about purity, a National Institutes of Health study on perceptions of water quality was published. In it, the authors told us people choose bottled waters based upon their subjective assessments of purity. The authors cited a study by Andy Opel, called Constructing Purity: Bottled Water and the Commodification of Nature. In it, he told us the marketing machine has cranked out new ways of describing branded, marketed bottled water (micro-filtered, reverse osmosis, ozonated) in attempts to stake claims of superior purity. My favorite is "electrodialysis reversal," which sounds more like a painful hospital procedure than something I'd want to drink. Opel also tells us the labels on bottled waters are the most prevalent source of brand image for many consumers and talks about how the art and text are mostly sleight-of-hand.

Our opinions of things are influenced by how easily our brain is able to grasp them.

I found a study on ScienceDirect that showed bottled water was perceived to be at its purest when it had a foreign brand name that was short and easy to pronounce. I'm guessing no one over at "electrodialysis reversal" ever read this study. Author Andrew Postman says ads and labels drive home the perception of purity with images of pristine glaciers and crystal-clear mountain springs. The bottled water industry still sells purity by processes, labels, and names. Today in the U.S. alone, bottled water is a $20 billion industry, clear bottles are nearly universal, and now you know how it happened.

With research grinding to a halt in these anxious times, this is the ideal time for you to get an opinion about your research from a messenger who has been shot many times. My Outsider Information Audits of your research and your providers can be done remotely and I can provide training workshops when your company is back at work.

Or you can watch this Johnny Nash music video by clicking here.



Fay Hinkson, MBA

Driving strategy by leveraging customer data and insights

4 年

Enjoyed the article and Johnny Nash! I would never buy water in an opaque bottle. As for the names, of course there's Evian but I think of Naya by Nestlé and Eska, a Canadian brand. I vaguely wondered why they named it Eska but as it's Canadian and supposed to be from glaciers (I think?) I buy it to support a local company. It's also cheaper. Canadian first, cheaper second and the fact that like many, I think they're all the same - with some particularly bad exceptions.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了