Hurry – subject to the Ten Commandments ?!

Hurry – subject to the Ten Commandments ?!

?

Context :

Expedite pending trials against MPs, MLAs: SC???? ……….. HT? /? 10 Nov 2023

Extract :

The Supreme Court on Thursday issued a string of directives to expedite pending criminal trials against the members of legislative assemblies and Parliament

“ Of these ( 5,175 ), cases that are pending for more than five years are as many as 2,116, which figure is more than 40% of such pendencies. This is a large number,” lamented the bench

?

The bench directed :

?

( 1 )?? ?Chief justices of all 25 high courts across the country to register cases on their own motion (suo motu)

????? ????to monitor the early disposal of criminal cases pending against the members of Parliament and

???????? ?legislative assemblies

?

( 2 )?? These cases may be heard by the special bench presided by the chief justices or benched assigned by

???????? ?them.

?

( 3 )?? The high court may issue such orders and/or directions as are necessary for expeditious and effective

??????? ?disposal of the subject cases.

?

( 4 )?? The special bench may consider calling upon the advocate general or the public prosecutor to assist the

???????? ?court

?

( 5 )?? The principal district and sessions judge may be asked to send periodical reports on status of such

???????? ?trials.

?

( 6 )?? The designated trial courts shall give priority to criminal cases against MPs and MLAs punishable with

??????? ??death or life imprisonment and then to cases punishable with imprisonment for five years or more.

???????? ?Offences such as murder, rape of minor, kidnapping for ransom and mutiny can entail death penalty for

???????? ?convicts.

?

( 7 )?? The trial courts shall not adjourn the cases except for rare and compelling reasons.

?

( 8 )?? The learned chief justices may list cases in which orders of stay of trial have been passed before the

??????? ?Special Bench to ensure that appropriate orders, including vacation of stay orders are passed to ensure

??????? ?commencement and conclusion of trial

?

( 9 )?? High courts shall create an independent tab on their websites providing district-wise information about

??????? ??the details of the year of filing of such cases, their status and other relevant details.

?

( 10 )? The special bench may pass such orders or give such additional directions as are necessary for early

?????? ????disposal of the subject cases

?

My Take :

?

2019 : Nightmare Year ?.... ……………………………….12 Dec 2017

?

Extract :

?

I assume that ,

?

?

·?????It will be?May 2018?, by the time these Special Courts start working – more than?4 YEARS?after the Supreme Court directed the Centre to set up these courts

?

·?????These “ Super Efficient “ courts will refuse to grant any “ Postponement Dates “ to the accused and not only conclude within?ONE HOUR?( whether the accused was guilty or not ) but also announce the VERDICT , on the spot ( remember ,?4.6 cases / day?? )

?

·?????There cannot be any “?Appeal?“ against the judgements of these special courts

?

·?????Some?365?MPs / MLAs ( out of those 1581 accused ) will be found?GUILTY

?

?

·?????The Speakers of the Lok Sabha / Rajya Sabha , will get court order copies?within 7 days

?

·?????The Speakers will disqualify ,?within 7 days?, those MPs / MLAs who are declared guilty and who have been handed out sentences of 5 years or more

?

·?????The Election Commission will receive these “ Disqualification Notifications “?in 7 days

?

·?????The Election Commission will announce re-election dates?within 30 days?for seats falling vacant

?

·?????These re-elections will?start from Dec 2018? and stretch throughout?365 days of 2019

?

?

·?????To ensure proper / timely availability of Election officers / police / EVMs / polling booths / presiding officers / school-teachers / transport etc , spread over 28 States , no more than?ONE ELECTION?will be conducted?PER DAY?( - for each of?365 days of 2019?! )

?

?

With regards,

Hemen Parekh

www.hemenparekh.ai? /? 12 Dec 2023

?

And , when questioned about my suggestion , ChatGPT replied as follows :

?

Thank you for sharing the information and your perspective. It seems like you are proposing an accelerated process for the trials of cases against MPs and MLAs, leading to quick disqualification and re-elections. Your suggestion involves the use of "Super Efficient" courts and the implementation of a timeline for various stages of the process.

Now, regarding the use of AI tools to expedite these cases, it's important to note that AI can indeed play a role in streamlining legal processes, but there are also challenges and considerations to be taken into account:

1.???? Case Management: AI can be used for efficient case management, helping courts keep track of the large volume of cases. It can automate scheduling, document management, and other administrative tasks.

2.???? Predictive Analysis: AI algorithms can analyze case data to predict case outcomes, helping courts prioritize and focus resources on cases with a higher likelihood of guilt. This could potentially assist in expediting cases.

3.???? Virtual Courts: The Supreme Court's directive to switch over to E-Courts aligns with the idea of virtual courts, and AI can enhance the virtual court experience. This includes features like automated transcription, virtual assistants for judges, and AI-driven case analysis.

4.???? Data Visualization: Creating independent tabs on high court websites for district-wise information, as suggested in the directives, could benefit from AI-driven data visualization tools for a more accessible presentation of information.

However, it's crucial to consider the ethical implications, potential biases in AI algorithms, and the need for human oversight in legal proceedings.

Additionally, the legal system involves complex decision-making that may not be fully replaceable by AI.

Your proposed timeline and processes assume a high level of efficiency and promptness in the legal system. Implementing such changes would require careful planning, infrastructure development, and addressing potential challenges.

In conclusion, while AI tools can contribute to expediting legal processes, they should be integrated thoughtfully, considering legal, ethical, and practical aspects.

?

?

?

?

?