Hurricanes Milton and Helene Reveal Flaws in U.S. Flood Risk Mapping

Hurricanes Milton and Helene have highlighted serious shortcomings in the flood-risk maps used across the U.S. With back-to-back megastorms flooding the Southeast, it’s become evident that the federal flood maps, which guide millions of homeowners, are not keeping pace with the intensifying climate threats.

?

The Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) flood maps, widely used to assess risk, particularly in mortgage-backed properties, are outdated and often overlook the threat posed by heavy rainfall. As climate change fuels more intense rainstorms, the maps have failed to capture the full scope of the risk. This leaves many homeowners unprepared for the increasing dangers.

?

A Bloomberg Green study compared FEMA's flood-risk areas with actual flood events from Helene, analyzing data from four affected cities: Tampa (FL), Augusta (GA), Valdosta (GA), and Greenville (SC). The findings show a troubling mismatch. In Tampa, 66% of flooding occurred inside FEMA's designated high-risk areas, while in Augusta, that figure dropped to 49%. Valdosta saw only 17%, and Greenville, 24%. These discrepancies underscore the outdated nature of FEMA’s flood mapping system.

?

FEMA flood maps are designed to highlight areas with at least a 1% chance of annual flooding, helping set insurance requirements. However, a FEMA spokesperson confirmed that the maps focus primarily on river and coastal flooding, not on extreme rain events. This limitation leaves many properties vulnerable, despite the appearance of safety on FEMA’s maps.

?

Floodbase, a company that monitors flooding using satellite technology, provided key insights into the areas impacted by Helene. In cities like Tampa and Augusta, flooding extended beyond FEMA's high-risk zones, exposing more properties to unexpected floodwaters. In Valdosta and Greenville, most flood damage occurred in areas outside FEMA's designated high-risk areas, reflecting the urgent need for updated risk assessments.

?

Despite the clear need for modernization, FEMA’s maps are often decades out of date. In many counties, maps are over 15 years old, making them unreliable for current risk evaluations. While FEMA is working on a long-term project to update and improve its mapping with climate considerations, progress has been slow, leaving many areas vulnerable to unforeseen flooding.

?

As fewer than 4% of Americans hold flood insurance policies, with even lower coverage rates in inland states like Georgia, the outdated maps contribute to underinsurance. In areas frequently impacted by hurricanes, like Florida’s Gulf Coast, insurance coverage is more common. But further inland, the lack of coverage could spell financial disaster for many unprotected homeowners.

?

Private companies have begun offering alternative flood maps, accounting for climate change and providing more precise risk evaluations. However, these maps vary in quality and consistency, raising concerns about their reliability.

The federal government’s efforts to update its flood maps are crucial, but until they reflect the real-world risks posed by hurricanes like Milton and Helene, millions of Americans will continue to face unrecognized dangers.

#Peacock #Insurance #Reinsurance #Claims #FloodRisk #ClimateChange #Helene #Milton