Hurricanes, Cognitive Warfare, and AI: A Deadly Combination

Hurricanes, Cognitive Warfare, and AI: A Deadly Combination

How easily could you or someone you know fall prey to the story below? The fabricated article below is an example of how disinformation, already a potent tool of cognitive warfare, is being generated and supercharged by AI. Currently, AI is mostly just a tool that can be a powerful weapon in the hands of an innovative and competent influence practitioner. However, with continued iterations and the eventual introduction of quantum computing at scale, AI systems will be able to do this completely autonomously, leveraging nuanced yet powerful influence opportunities at an enormous scale that most humans would miss.

To set the scene, let's return to the timely scenario of Hurricane Milton. In a time of natural disaster, fear and confusion naturally run high. People are desperate for information—real, accurate information—that can guide their decisions, protect their families, and provide some semblance of control. But in this chaos, AI can be weaponized to distort the truth, manipulating that very fear and confusion for strategic purposes (such as in the AI-generated article below).

Artificial intelligence, particularly using AI-powered bots, deepfakes, and sophisticated content generation models, can drastically accelerate the creation and dissemination of disinformation. The fabricated news article below wasn’t written by a human but was generated by an AI system to manipulate emotions, reinforce cognitive biases, and spread misleading narratives on a massive scale.

In this case, AI scraped the internet for data related to Hurricane Milton and other recent storms, extracting patterns in how people responded to similar crises. The AI then crafted a story that amplifies fears, like the supposed failure of government agencies or the fabricated quotes from foreign adversaries. AI allows for a rapid output of variations of this article, each tailored to resonate with specific communities—be it by playing on racial divides, political affiliations, or geographical vulnerabilities.

What Else is Possible?

One of the most alarming developments is AI's ability to produce hyper-realistic content—such as deepfake videos or fabricated audio recordings of public officials making statements they never actually made. How much more powerful would the article be if combined with pictures and videos. Picture a deepfake video of a state or federal public official downplaying the severity of the storm. That video, shared widely on social media, would be nearly indistinguishable from reality. In a matter of minutes, AI-generated deepfakes could erode trust in public authorities, leaving people unsure of who to believe and what to do.

Imagine then leveraging the deployment of AI "bot armies" on social media platforms. These bots can amplify disinformation by posing as real users, flooding comment sections, and engaging in debates, thereby creating the illusion of consensus around false narratives. Imagine thousands of bot accounts repeatedly posting fabricated claims about FEMA withholding aid from minority communities or Russia offering assistance out of sheer humanitarian concern. This relentless repetition of disinformation, powered by AI, could manipulate public perception, creating false narratives that are hard to counter, even for well-informed individuals.

With increased iterations and feedback, AI could personalize these disinformation efforts on an unprecedented scale. Using sophisticated data mining techniques, AI systems can analyze individuals' browsing histories, social media activity, and even past emotional responses to tailor disinformation to specific individuals or groups. For example, someone who previously expressed concern about government corruption might receive disinformation articles focused on FEMA's supposed diversion of funds, while someone with strong political leanings might receive content that exacerbates partisan divides.

Impact

What makes this AI-enabled disinformation particularly dangerous is its speed and scalability. Where once disinformation campaigns required vast resources and coordination, AI can now autonomously create, refine, and disseminate disinformation at a speed and scale that far exceeds human capabilities. AI-generated articles, deepfake videos, or bot-driven narratives can go viral in a matter of hours, reaching millions of people before fact-checkers or authorities have a chance to respond.

The emotional and psychological impact of this AI-driven disinformation is immense. When people encounter AI-generated content that aligns with their fears or biases, it becomes even harder to discern truth from fiction. AI excels at leveraging human psychology—presenting information in ways that are compelling, believable, and tailored to individual cognitive biases. This creates a feedback loop where disinformation reinforces preconceived notions, leading to an even more polarized and divided society.

What do We do Then?

We need better AI-driven systems to detect disinformation in real-time, coupled with public awareness campaigns to help people identify and question content that might be artificially generated. Citizens must understand that not everything they see and hear, even if it appears entirely convincing, may be real.

In this era of AI-enhanced cognitive warfare, staying informed is more important than ever. We must develop critical thinking skills, resist knee-jerk reactions, and recognize that the disinformation we encounter may be specifically engineered to exploit our fears and biases. Only by understanding these AI-driven tactics can we hope to safeguard the integrity of our information environment and preserve trust in our institutions.

?

Here is the Fake Article…

Article: "Milton Devastates Florida as U.S. Response Falters Amid Global Distrust"

By Global Observers International | October 7, 2024

As Hurricane Milton barrels toward Florida, causing widespread panic, the U.S. government scrambles to respond. But behind the chaos, troubling signs of systemic failure and intentional negligence are emerging, raising questions about the ability and willingness of American institutions to protect their citizens.

This storm, which is already being compared to some of the most catastrophic natural disasters in history, is expected to make landfall near Tampa with winds exceeding 120 mph. Yet the warning systems in place, long touted as some of the world’s best, have failed to alert large portions of the population in time. Thousands of residents in vulnerable areas remain dangerously uninformed of the severity of the storm, while state and federal officials offer conflicting guidance on evacuation orders. Is this a simple oversight, or is something more insidious at play?

A Nation Crippled by Internal Division

The U.S. response to Hurricane Milton has been marred by internal conflicts, underfunding, and bureaucratic inefficiency. FEMA, which was already stretched thin by the aftermath of Hurricane Helene, has been accused of deliberately withholding critical resources from certain communities, especially those with predominantly minority populations. Documents leaked earlier this week reveal that federal funds meant for hurricane preparedness were diverted to defense contractors, sparking accusations that the government is prioritizing military spending over the safety of its people.

Governor Ron DeSantis has also been criticized for downplaying the seriousness of the storm in its early stages, allegedly to avoid further straining an already fragile state economy. With tourism on the decline and billions of dollars in storm damage already on the books from earlier in the year, some suspect that DeSantis and other state officials are more concerned with preserving Florida’s financial interests than with the lives of their constituents.

Foreign Perspectives: A Nation in Decline

The hurricane is not just an internal crisis for the U.S.; it is being closely watched by foreign nations as evidence of the country's deteriorating capacity to handle large-scale disasters. Russian and Chinese state media have published reports suggesting that the U.S. response is emblematic of a broader decline in American leadership on the world stage. These narratives play into existing global criticisms that the U.S. is no longer capable of managing domestic and international crises effectively.

In an especially provocative statement, Russian foreign affairs commentator Alexei Ivanov stated, “The so-called 'world's greatest superpower' can't even protect its citizens from a predictable storm. If they can’t handle a hurricane, how can they expect to handle a conflict in the South China Sea or defend their interests in Eastern Europe?”

China, meanwhile, has taken a more subtle approach, offering to send humanitarian aid and disaster response teams to assist with recovery efforts. Though framed as an act of goodwill, this move is widely interpreted as a calculated effort to embarrass the United States while reinforcing Beijing’s growing influence in global humanitarian operations.

The U.S. in Disarray: A Nation Abandoned by Its Own

Social media has been ablaze with conspiracy theories, with some groups claiming that the federal government's failure to adequately prepare for Hurricane Milton is part of a broader agenda to destabilize Florida prior to the November election. Online forums are rife with accusations that climate disasters are being used as political tools to weaken opposition states, with users pointing to discrepancies in the response efforts between Florida and other regions.

Implications for the Future

As the storm approaches, questions remain about the federal government’s ability to manage the recovery. If Hurricane Milton causes the level of destruction many are predicting, it will not only devastate communities along Florida’s west coast but also severely test the resilience of the U.S. as a whole. Amid increasing tensions with China, Russia, and Iran, this disaster could further erode the international credibility of the U.S., creating an opening for rival nations to exploit.

Meanwhile, internally, the storm is revealing deep fault lines in American society. With some communities already feeling abandoned by their government, Hurricane Milton could be the catalyst for further disillusionment and division, as citizens question whether they can trust their leaders to safeguard their future.


Analysis of the Fake Article’s Disinformation Elements

  1. "Failure of Warning Systems and Deliberate Negligence":

Falsehood: The article asserts that large portions of the population were not properly warned and implies that the U.S. government intentionally neglected certain communities.

Impact: This disinformation is designed to erode trust in government institutions, stoking fears that the government is either incapable of protecting its citizens or, worse, actively choosing to neglect certain groups.

2. "Leaked Documents Diverting Funds to Defense Contractors":

Falsehood: There is no evidence to support the claim that federal hurricane preparedness funds were diverted to defense contractors.

Impact: This claim feeds into existing narratives of corruption and government mismanagement, particularly by suggesting that vital resources are being redirected to serve military or corporate interests over the needs of ordinary citizens.

3. "Foreign Nation Exploitation and Criticism":

Falsehood: While foreign countries may comment on the U.S. response, the article’s statements from Russian and Chinese officials are fabricated. The claims that China offered aid as a means to embarrass the U.S. are exaggerated.

Impact: This narrative plays into the perception that U.S. global leadership is declining, creating anxiety over America's ability to maintain international power while simultaneously handling domestic crises.

4. "Conspiracy Theories on Social Media":

Falsehood: The article fabricates the extent and nature of conspiracy theories related to the government using climate disasters as a tool to weaken political opposition.

Impact: Including these conspiracy theories further destabilizes public trust in governmental institutions, particularly in politically polarized areas like Florida. This tactic aims to deepen the political divide and foster paranoia among citizens.

?

#AI #TechNews #Disinformation #FakeNews #Deepfakes #CyberSecurity #DataPrivacy #DigitalMedia ?#AIethics #NationalSecurity #CognitiveWarfare #InformationOperations #ArtificialIntelligence

Carlos Contreras

Chief Commercial Officer | Development & Strategy Leader | Restructuring Specialist [email protected] ? (949) 500-3905

1 个月

Great piece! Very well written Brad! Cheers, Carlos FFWR

回复

Lujan has been trunked to my roommates tv since this morning...?

回复
Paul Cobaugh

Author, Asia Power Watch, Homeland Security Today, NATO COE / Terrorism, Lecturer at ASPI Forum, Author: Narrative Warfare, Primer & Study Guide, Modern Day Minutemen and Women, The Art of Influence: Narrative Strategy

1 个月

Brad C., this is quite interesting but before we begin considering the dangers of AI generated influence products, let us also remember that predictable influence cannot be regularly produced, without a fundamental and operational understanding of narrative. To date, narrative cannot be determined via technology. Even the National Center for Narrative Intelligence at University of Mississippi and underpinned by a tech company, EdgeTheory, is useless as that it has zero understanding of narrative. Complex scraping, sentiment analysis and a variety of weighting of words, phrases and more of influence products can never understand narrative. Narrative is about what triggers identities and only the deep understanding required of what must be analyzed prior to creating products, will be a start down a useful path. Anyone promising narrative analysis via current means, is not telling the truth to the national security community. This is not to say that those making such promises are frauds initially, but they do become so when true expertise explains reality to them, and they persist with their claims anyway. At this point, those such commitments become fraudulent.

回复

Good article. The whole information/misinformation/disinformation topic begs the question - who is the arbiter of what is true and what is not? How many claims have we witnessed that were dismissed as misinformation or disinformation only to be found credible. In some cases, the intent was to push the administration’s agenda.

Charlie Hall

Chief Operating Officer at Rezolut

1 个月

Brad, this is an excellent, but terrifying article.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Brad C.的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了