Hurricane Ian Wreaks Havoc
The phrase "all politics is local" - commonly attributed to Tip O'Neill, a former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives - came to mind as I sat down to write this week’s newsletter.? This week, the quote should be rephrased as “all climate change is local.”
Throughout this year, we have reported on floods, storms and other devastating weather events all over the world fueled by climate change. But, when it hits close to home as Hurricane Ian did this week, there is a heightened sense of urgency and dread. Perhaps some of you had a similar week of worry with loved ones in the path of this monster storm? (I am thankful that my family members are safe and my heart goes out to those who have experienced loss or are still in danger.)?
Even as hurricane Ian continues its path of destruction, the debate is raging about the connection between the intensity of this storm and climate change. CNN’s Don Lemon was scolded for turning the NOAA Hurricane Ian interview into a climate crisis debate filling conservative media outlets with joy (more on this below in notable news).
Bill McKibben laid it out well in his New Yorker column: “We’ve trapped a huge amount of the sun’s heat in the atmosphere by burning fossil fuel—the heat equivalent of more than half a million Hiroshima-sized explosions each day. That energy gets expressed in many ways. Most of that excess heat—about ninety-three percent of it—has gone not into the atmosphere but into the oceans, and that has a direct bearing on storms like Ian. Hurricanes draw their power from ocean heat, and so more storms in recent years have shown an inclination toward what scientists call “rapid intensification,” their winds spinning up rapidly as they pass over patches of particularly hot water (such as, for instance, the current Gulf of Mexico).”
Environment and Energy Leader
Financing Net Zero?
The costs to clean up the damage from Hurricane Ian will soar into the billions. And then these costs will be multiplied by the next extreme weather event and the one after that. For years now, the financial community has been waking up to the financial risks of climate change and, this week they proposed new actions.
The Net-Zero Asset Owner Alliance (NZAO - a UN-convened group formed of 74 institutional investors with over $10.6tn in assets) published a new report calling for greater use of blended finance vehicles to fund a net zero transition. Blended finance is the combination of?development finance (such as loans from the world bank) and private capital.??
“Africa alone needs an estimated $3tn by the end of this decade to achieve its collective climate goals. For the world as a whole, we’re looking at anywhere between $3tn and $6tn per year until 2050.” Said Guenther Thallinger, chair of the Alliance.
Getty Images
World Bank Woes?
NZAO is a powerful voice urging multilateral development banks to do more. But, as we reported last week, there is controversy over the World Bank’s role to help nations struggling with devastating floods, heat, drought and other climate impacts, and whether its financing of new oil and gas projects is exacerbating the problem.
This controversy boiled over when the President of the World Bank, David Malpass, was labeled a climate denier by Al Gore and then dug the hole a little deeper later that day when he refused to acknowledge that the burning of fossil fuels is rapidly warming the planet (the video in this article is worth watching).?
Although Mr Malpass has since apologized for this remark, calls for his resignation picked up momentum when US presidential envoy for climate John Kerry endorsed his ouster. Pressure ratcheted up for the Trump appointee when the White House press secretary said “We disagree with the comments made by president Malpass. We expect the World Bank to be a global leader of climate ambition and mobilization, as well as significantly more finance for developing countries… We condemn the words of the president.”
No Nukes
Environmental groups, spearheaded by Greenpeace, have united to take legal action against the European Commission for allowing gas and nuclear energy in Europe’s list of permitted sustainable investments. The groups, including Client Earth and the WWF, contend that gas is the highest carbon emitter in Europe’s power sector, and that nuclear power uses huge amounts of freshwater, which results in negative impacts on biodiversity.
领英推荐
?“This fake green label is incompatible with EU environment and climate laws,” said Ariadna Rodrigo, of Greenpeace - adding: “Gas is a leading cause of climate and economic chaos, while there is still no solution to the problem of nuclear radioactive waste and the risk of nuclear accidents…”?
An opinion piece from Farhad Manjoo in the New York Times also took a negative stand on nuclear energy based on the costs and benefits: ?
“The 63 nuclear reactors that went into service around the world between 2011 and 2020 took an average of around 10 years to build. By comparison, solar and wind farms can be built in months; in 2020 and 2021 alone, the world added 464 gigawatts of wind and solar power-generation capacity, which is more power than can be generated by all the nuclear plants operating in the world today.”
The New York Times
Nature or Nurture??
Biodiversity loss is increasingly becoming a topic of interest for board directors and senior business executives around the world.?
A new McKinsey report looked at where Fortune 500 companies stood on the nature crisis. While 83% have targets related to climate change, a mere 5% set targets for biodiversity loss.
Is Climate Tech Recession Proof?
With economists predicting a global economic recession, investors look for safer assets like government bonds and blue chip companies.? Where does that leave climate tech?
Things are different now, according to Mark Cupta, managing director of Prelude Ventures. “2022 is on pace to eclipse every other year in venture-capital fundraising” with the trend “amplified” for climate investing, he says. Every climate startup that Prelude has recently backed has received highly competitive investor bids in funding rounds. “There’s still a very robust, potentially recession-proof, segment within climate tech for people who are trying to solve really hard problems,” he says.
Meanwhile, there’s now more money than ever being unlocked for cutting-edge solutions to global warming. The new US climate bill, which will provide $370 billion in climate spending, has plenty of incentives for solar and wind power, but also for nascent technologies, such as direct air capture and long-duration energy storage for the grid. It’s no surprise that academics and scientists are increasingly jumping ship to the climate tech world.?
“That makes it economic for [these startups] to manufacture and sell from day zero,” says Gabriel Kra, who is also managing director at Prelude Ventures along with Cupta.
PLEASE LIKE, SHARE AND SUBSCRIBE
NOTABLE NEWS
NOTABLE PODCASTS
?? 9 Figure Entrepreneur | 16X Company Founder | Alpha Web Summit Invitee | Collision Invitee | NC Idea Alum | Innovate Carolina | 1789 Venture Lab Alum | I Grow and Scale Your Business 10X to 100X!
1 年Hey , We are a software company that builds anything in tech from mobile and web apps to automation to AI to cybersecurity to virtual reality and many more for you with free marketing for the first 6 months. Let’s Grow Your Business with ARSource. DM us to learn more about how to get started.
Corporate Sustainability/ESG Consultant, Professor Associado na FDC - Funda??o Dom Cabral, Advisor Professor at FDC
2 年Sharing in Linkedin group "Realidade Climatica/Climate Reality - Brazil" - linkedin.com/groups/8196252/
SDG Publishers Compact Fellow | doctoral student
2 年Tim, you're always on top of it. Your newsletter makes me feel on top of climate crisis news too. Thanks for all your hard work. ????