HUMAS System and the Philosophy of the Future: A Pragmatic Approach

Philosophy and technology intertwine in the pursuit of building a better society. HUMAS System is an innovative ecosystem based on personal development, social integration, and objective recognition of participants' contributions. In this context, an interesting parallel can be drawn with the works of philosopher Richard Rorty, who advanced ideas of pragmatism and criticized traditional philosophy, offering new orientations for the future.

Pragmatism as a Foundation for Development

Rorty rejected absolute truths and argued that reality should not be bound by outdated dogmas. Instead, he focused on creating practical solutions that help society evolve. This approach aligns with HUMAS System, which is not built on coercion or rigid frameworks but on flexibility, self-development, and the free choice of participants.

Pragmatism in HUMAS System is expressed through:

• Freedom of choice – participation is voluntary, with no sanctions or coercion.
• Openness – the system is transparent, and algorithms are understandable.
• Practical benefits – rewards are given for contributions rather than status or privilege.

Moving Away from Rigid Dogmas

Rorty called for abandoning the idea of philosophy as a tool for seeking ultimate truth. He believed that society should shape its own truth based on contemporary challenges. HUMAS System follows a similar logic: it does not impose rigid rules but provides a platform where people can adapt the system to their needs, creating a fair environment.

This approach sets HUMAS System apart from rigid social structures where ratings and regulations are dictated externally. Instead, the system becomes an instrument for societal evolution, helping it progress based on actual achievements and contributions.

Conclusion: The Rebellion of Pragmatism

Some may consider such a philosophy rebellious, as it challenges outdated models of thinking and governance. However, like Rorty’s pragmatism, HUMAS System does not seek destruction but rather explores new possibilities. This rebellion is not for conflict’s sake but for progress.

HUMAS System and Rorty’s philosophy share a common goal: to create a realistic and fair system where the key criterion is not group affiliation but actual contributions and personal growth.