Human Adaptability Still Needed in an AI-Driven World

Human Adaptability Still Needed in an AI-Driven World

If you’re one of the countless people wringing their hands over the prospect of artificial intelligence (AI) taking over the world, you might want to take a closer look at the kind of world AI is supposedly inheriting.

It’s a world where human flexibility and adaptability are needed more than ever.

AI can outperform humans in various ways but dealing with unrelenting change is not one of them – especially the fevered variety we are now subject to every day.

The stop-go regime of President Donald Trump is a prime example. Just in the week or so preceding the writing of this blog post, the US slapped tariffs on imports of steel and aluminum from Canada, Mexico and the European Union, the on-off summit between President Trump and Kim Jong Un, the leader of North Korea, was apparently on again, and early talks began on a summit between President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

But the current occupant of the White House is by no means the only source of the extreme turbulence that is buffeting the world. In Europe, for example, the Brexit negotiations seem to deliver a daily diet of surprises, there are fears that a new governing coalition in Italy will stoke resentment of the country’s eurozone membership, and the Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy was deposed in a no-confidence vote. The Middle East remains intensely volatile.

There is little respite in the commercial world. The rapid pace of technological change and the ongoing advance of e-commerce are just two of the forces that are restructuring markets and rewriting the competitive rulebook.

No company is immune from these changes; not even long-established ones. For example, as the Wall Street Journal reported recently, the departure of longtime CEO Denise Morrison is a symptom of the crisis facing the 149-year-old Campbell Soup Company, which is being hit by a new generation of small brands unfazed by Campbell’s formidable supply chain reach.

AI has a role to play in these tumultuous times – but so do humans. Increasingly so.

It’s important to keep in mind that AI is essentially a backward-looking technology. Machine learning, a key application of AI, is based on the notion that machines can learn from data. Give a machine enough data (although the data must be clean and formatted correctly) and it can learn extremely quickly from experience and project forward – as long as the past’s rules have not changed.

But what if the experience delineated by the data is not a complete reflection of reality, or is rendered largely redundant by a fundamentally new situation?

An example of the first issue is the failure of facial recognition systems based on machine learning technology to accurately read African-American faces. Researchers have found that while algorithms are able to read white faces accurately, they are less competent when scanning dark-skinned faces. The reason is that darker skin tones tend to be underrepresented in the training data used to create the algorithms.

Extreme changeability of the kind we are now witnessing also can affect the performance of machine learning algorithms. Learning from vast amounts of data on what occurred in the past is all very well, but what happens if the future presents situations that are unprecedented? Experience might not provide a template for how to react.

This is where the versatility of human decision-making excels. While people use their experience of past events to make decisions, they also are wired to rapidly reboot when confronted by a totally new set of experiences.

It’s important not to forget these capabilities in the rush to adopt AI or, for that matter, digitization generally. Digitizing business processes is already delivering significant benefits, and will no doubt become more powerful as companies gain more experience and the component technologies mature.

However, taking people out of the equation is not always a good idea at a time when we need them to help us navigate through extremely turbulent times.

I don't believe that anybody thinks, or wants, machines to take over 100%. But, I also believe that you vastly overestimate what humans are contributing and what machines cannot. There are plenty of AI examples now showing the AIs solving tasks when they are left to freely explore and learn vs being preprogrammed to initially behave a certain way. Machines can store and learn much more quickly tgan humans too. Free roaming video game mastery is a good example. Infinitely complex gameplay with strategies humans never devised, learning from 100s of simultaneous games, defeating human world champs with ease now.

There's no such thing as A.I. every macine is "PROGRAMMED". Usually by a pencil necked little demon out to ruin your life. #machinesareofdevils

回复
Larry McGinity

Creator of the Art as a Derivative concept. Uniquely, I make art about the people and structures shaping financial markets.

6 年

Something must have gone awry just a little for it to appear necessary to state correctly that Human Adaptability will remain a keystone in an AI-driven world. However the troubles described in the introduction make it seem that we are in the midst of a Jacobean Tragedy and we can't quit the stage. What we must do before exiting is get some perspective. The recent past shows our inability to successfully regulate or even get a handle on financial markets, big-pharma and social media. When I was researching for my The Financial Crisis Show - Art as a Derivative art series I came across enormous amounts of evidence that, for example, the complexity of the derivatives market had not been grasped by regulators nor the speed (HFT) at which orders could be sent and withdrawn understood. Why we are not preparing AI oversight; about engaging? ethics/social anthropology/cultural studies depts. in the same universities at the forefront of AI research to help set a framework, act as Devil's Advocate where necessary, I don't know. You'd think to mitigate reputational risk after recent data scandals, it would be obligatory. Just one, minor, correction Yossi Sheffi, the Brexit negotiations seem to deliver a constant diet of no surprises.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Yossi Sheffi的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了