Is HR Earning its Keep?
HR organizations got a boost in investment in 2014, with budgets up an average of 4% over the prior year. Much of the extra money went to increased headcount, with HR staffing up 3%, on average. Another big area of investment was HR technology, with one-fifth organizations saying they increased their spending on HR systems during 2014. (Source: HR Factbook 2015, Bersin by Deloitte.)
So how are these investments paying off? For most organizations, not very well.
In Deloitte’s newly-released study, just 36% of organizations rated their HR team's performance as either “good” or “excellent.” And these ratings are not significantly better than in past years (see figure 1.)
So for many organizations, that additional money has not been well spent.
But some HR groups are different, and HR leaders would do well to learn some lessons from these organizations.
Bersin by Deloitte's research describes a growth model in the maturity of HR capabilities. Most HR organizations start out as “compliance-driven” functions, focused on primary services such as payroll and benefits and meeting legal requirements. Over time, HR organizations need to expand their scope of initiatives and business alignment. At the highest stage of maturity, the “business-integrated” HR organization helps drive the business through workforce strategies and people data. These business-integrated HR functions do spend more than their less mature counterparts - $4,434 per employee, on average, as compared with just $2,112 among compliance-driven HR functions.
But the difference is, their efforts are paying off.
As evidence, business-integrated HR organizations have lower involuntary turnover compared to compliance-driven HR organizations (8% vs. 11%)—and each percentage point drop in turnover can be worth millions to a large organization. In addition, companies with business-integrated HR organizations have higher promotion rates, creating solid talent pipelines that enable them to take a long-term view of roles and future needs.
So when HR organizations look at their budgets, they need to ensure their spending is helping to enhance their effectiveness. The Deloitte study recommends the following to help organizations get started:
- Design the HR organization to deliver solutions: For many businesses, it is time to redesign HR with a focus on consulting and service delivery, not just efficiency of administration. HR business partners must become trusted business advisors with the requisite skills to analyze, consult, and resolve critical business issues.
- Create business-integrated “networks of excellence.” Rather than locating HR specialists in central teams, embed them into the business—but coordinate them by building a strong network of expertise. Recruitment, development, employee relations, and coaching are all strategic programs that should be centrally coordinated but locally implemented. When specialists in these areas live and work close to the business, their impact is greatly enhanced.
- Make HR a talent and leadership magnet: How do people get HR jobs in your company? If they accidentally move into HR, this may be holding you back. Create rigorous assessments for top HR staff and rotate high performers from the business into HR to create a magnet for strong leaders.
- Invest in HR development and skills as if the business depended on it: HR professionals at all levels need continuous professional development. Create your own “HR university” and invest in professional development to make sure your HR team is constantly sharpening its own saw and developing the necessary skills to survive. Focus on capabilities such as business acumen, consulting and project management skills, organizational design and change, and HR analytical skills.
For more information, see Human Capital Trends 2015 study and HR Factbook 2015.
Brand YOU! | Networking & Personal Branding | Empowering Small Business Owners, BDMs and Relationship Managers to Connect and Thrive | LinkedIn | Social Selling | AI Coach & Strategy | Manningham Business Network
9 年A brief post I wrote recently on the subject matter: https://nzlead.com/nzlead-recap-how-do-we-show-the-value-of-hr/ - I think you will find it embraces majority of what Mark Berry has refers to above.
Chief People Officer @ Inari | HR Strategy Development | Culture & Experience
9 年Third, HR needs to seek to extract the value out of what is already being done - or stop doing it. One significant area of opportunity is technology. Much is being invested in this area - I believe Bersin's number is approximately $9B/year. However, HR has tended to leverage these investments as primarily process enablers; we "install", but rarely seek to optimize (both process & outcomes). As we look to make technological investments, the challenge is to not stop at "go live" - "go live" for technology is the time to begin to do the hard work - extracting the full value of the investment, addressing data, process, and technology impediments to greater success. In our personal lives, few would write the checks we write for technology investment, then do so little post-implementation to get the full value available. HR will gain credibility to the degree that we start focused on evidence-based interventions and stop focusing on "best practices" that can't be generalized to our specific business or unique issues (business folks refer to these as "HR's flavor of the month"), traditional HR processes, and what we last read in HR Magazine or heard about at a conference that has no bearing on the short- or longer-terms needs of the businesses we support.
Chief People Officer @ Inari | HR Strategy Development | Culture & Experience
9 年Great article, Karen. I'd add at least two items... First, HR needs to measure what we manage - and then manage what we measure. HR owns significant contributors of cost in most organizations, the largest of which are compensation, benefits (primarily health care), and talent acquisition. However, I see very few organizations making a concerted effort to systematically identify key cost drivers and analyze the degree to which they provide the intended value to the organization (or could be optimize to provide greater value at a lower cost). We want to focus on building capabilities (talent), but stay as far away as possible from understanding & managing cost (dollars). Imagine the credibility HR would gain if we focused efforts on evaluating the impact of the programs we propose, could talk to the cost/benefits of the investments we're asking the business to make, & had the courage to kill what doesn't deliver the required returns. Second (and relevant to your points), HR needs to stop talking about HR programs and processes and shift focus to business strategy, risks to realizing the desired outcomes of the strategy, and how we - HR - can mitigate this risk by fashioning interventions aligned to those specific risks (and - let's not forget - doing this in a way that allows us to evaluate whether the intervention realized its intended outcomes). HR needs to upskill in terms of business strategy, be able to discern how people impact the business' strategic initiatives, fashion interventions that will drive improved outcomes as part of these initiatives, and quantify the impact of these interventions. (CONT)