"How would you handle a situation where the same issue is being litigated in court and arbitrated in a separate proceeding?”
Navigating the Labyrinth: The Parallel Realities of Litigation and Arbitration
As a seasoned legal recruiter specializing in the international arbitration space, I am often asked complex questions that go beyond the boundaries of conventional legal theory. Recently, a prospective candidate posed an intriguing query: "How would you handle a situation where the same issue is being litigated in court and arbitrated in a separate proceeding?" This question is incredibly topical, demanding an understanding of international arbitration intricacies, particularly the concept of public policy. It is in response to this curiosity that I present this detailed exposition.
A Tricky Balance: Public Policy and Arbitration
Before diving into the conundrum, let's first decipher the concept of public policy within international arbitration. As French jurist Albert Venn Dicey astutely stated, "Public policy is the embodiment of societal norms, rules, and expectations." When engaging in international arbitration, this principle often underpins the legitimacy of proceedings, and violating it can lead to the nullification of arbitration awards.
Real World Intricacies: A Tale from the Trenches
In elucidating the mechanics of managing litigation and arbitration concurrently, I wish to share an instance - a riveting tale that pits public policy against arbitration. Here's the crux: A dispute concerning a commercial contract was concurrently arbitrated in a neutral forum and litigated in court. With the court ruling one way and the arbitration tribunal the other, the stage was set for a legal tug-of-war.
The Dilemma: Treading the Tightrope
In an ideal world, arbitration should proceed unhindered by concurrent litigation. Yet, in reality, striking a balance is challenging, especially when public policy weighs in. The dilemma lies in avoiding public policy violation while ensuring arbitration's sanctity. The question is how?
Steps to Resolution: Juggling Two Hats
Step 1: Communicating Effectively
Keeping lines of communication open is paramount. Convey to the court and tribunal the ongoing parallel proceedings, ensuring transparency and averting any accusation of impropriety. It's about integrity, a vital asset for any lawyer, as underscored by former U.S. Supreme Court Justice, Potter Stewart, "Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do."
领英推荐
Step 2: Crafting a Strategic Approach
A strategy hinging on the procedural rules of both court and arbitration is crucial. Play your cards right - possibly seeking a stay in one forum or coordinating timings, to ensure no collision with public policy.
Step 3: Navigating Public Policy Challenges
Public policy must be respected, but with an eye on arbitration. It's a delicate dance, one that often involves navigating complex legal doctrines like 'lis pendens' and 'res judicata'. Navigate this labyrinth successfully, and you might just have your cake and eat it too!
Practical Tips: Ace the Interview and Beyond
When asked about managing concurrent litigation and arbitration, keep the following pointers in mind:
In Closing: Let's Connect
Navigating the legal field's intricate corridors can be daunting. However, remember that these challenges also pave the way for personal and professional growth. If this resonates with you or if you're looking for career advice, please do get in touch with me at [email protected].
Additionally, I encourage you to sign up for my newsletter to gain exclusive insights not shared online. To subscribe, visit www.tattonsheikh.com. I look forward to connecting with you and supporting your journey in the exciting world of international arbitration.