How to Validate Project Assumptions

How to Validate Project Assumptions

Validating the assumptions included in the project justification is key to minimizing project risk. Sometimes, straightforward research is enough. For assumptions that aren’t easily validated, here are other approaches to validate or, at least, reduce the probability of an assumption being wrong.??

  • Consult experts. Reach outside your organization. Seek the opinions of LinkedIn contacts, peers in project management associations, or prominent individuals in industry bodies. Ideally, get multiple perspectives so you can analyze the results to identify project situations that could render an assumption invalid. If you get differing opinions, use the Delphi approach. Send the differing opinions to your expert panel and ask them to comment on the rationale for dissenting views. Use the results of that exercise to figure out if the assumptions present a significant risk to the project.
  • Perform an audit. Find situations where you can directly test the validity of the assumption. Then, test the assumption via a manual process, querying a customer, or performing any other action that might provide a “sample result” you can use for validation purposes. For example, altering the directions you provide to clients to solve a product issue, publishing an advertisement with a different angle to a small set of clients, or changing the parameters of a system function to see if the subsequent system or user action is expected. Note: this approach has risks. You don’t want to frustrate a client or have an advertisement yield an adverse reaction to your product. To minimize risk of adverse outcomes, select the clients and situations carefully, and if feasible, alert a trusted client that you are trying something new.
  • Build a prototype. Designing a prototype process or I/T system is an effective way of validating assumptions. When it works, it triggers enthusiasm for the project and its potential business results. Depending on the situation, the prototype can be a small, standalone project or a set of features in an agile project environment. With this approach, be prepared for the project to take an unanticipated direction -- your stakeholders might create additional requirements. No worries, the result is often more effective than the original plan, so keep an open mind.
  • Conduct a survey. Query individuals who aren’t familiar with the project's justification and current assumptions. Why? Because stakeholders who know the assumptions can answer the survey questions to confirm or invalidate them based on their views about the project. Also, don’t make the mistake of taking a casual approach to designing survey questions. Use people with experience designing survey questions: the wording of survey questions is vital to ensure you get valid results.

Have you come up with other approaches for validating assumptions? Or have tips for managing the nagging feeling that you haven’t even identified all the assumptions? If so, share with us in the comments section.

_______________________________________

This article belongs to the?Bonnie’s Project Pointers newsletter series, which has more than 70,000 subscribers. This newsletter is 100% written by a human (no aliens or AIs involved). If you like this article, you can?subscribe to receive notifications when a new article posts.

Want to learn more about the topics I talk about in these newsletters? Watch my courses in the LinkedIn Learning Library and tune into my LinkedIn Office Hours live broadcasts.

_______________________________________


Samuel Onamade

Business Analyst | Project Manager | Product Manager

7 个月

Validate assumptions ensures guarantee project success and reduce risk. Scenario analysis is an additional method; by creating various scenario based on different hypotheses, the PM would assess possible outcomes and determine which assumptions have a crucial impact on project success. This method aids in comprehending how resilient your assumptions are in various scenarios. Participating in continuous monitoring and feedback loops is another piece of advice. Throughout the course of a project, it might be beneficial to periodically review and reevaluate assumptions in order to identify and address false assumptions early on. As new information becomes available, this proactive approach makes sure the project stays in line with reality.

回复
Victor KOMOLAFE

Project Consultant

9 个月

Well said. Consulting experts is an interesting and efficient approach to validate an assumption.

回复
Ed Krystosik

I help consultants grow their practices by enabling them to offer impactful AI solutions to their clients that solve real business problems. | Co-Founder of RAC/AI (An AI Solutions Provider)

9 个月

Great advice. Especially as technology takes on more of the menial tasks in project management, ensuring our assumptions are correct is even more important. Garbage in, garbage out!

回复
Rosmel Ortiz

Technical Project Manager | Technical Lead | PMP

9 个月

Thanks for sharing Bonnie. When it is not possible to validate whether an assumption is correct, what we do is not consider it or, depending on the degree of uncertainty, we associate a risk and its respective mitigation plan.

回复
Ademola Oladele, PMP, PSM, MS Azure, Trailhead Ranger

?? Senior IT Project Manager | Infrastructure | Digital Transformation | Agile & PMO Governance | Cloud | Gen AI | Cybersecurity | Salesforce Center of Excellence (CoE)

9 个月

True, especially consulting SME’s goes a long way to validate project assumptions

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Bonnie Biafore的更多文章

  • Better listening. Better results.

    Better listening. Better results.

    No matter how well you already listen, you can increase your success by listening even better. Here are exercises to…

    4 条评论
  • How to Get Buy-in from Non-management Stakeholders

    How to Get Buy-in from Non-management Stakeholders

    The business case that management uses to justify a project might not motivate non-management stakeholders to buy into…

    6 条评论
  • Developing Realistic Risk Responses

    Developing Realistic Risk Responses

    Project managers often fall short with planning risk responses, because the risk responses aren’t realistic or can’t be…

    14 条评论
  • How to Ensure Stakeholder Buy-In

    How to Ensure Stakeholder Buy-In

    For a project to be successful, stakeholders must adopt the products and/or processes the project delivers. Here are…

    4 条评论
  • Next Level Critical Path Management

    Next Level Critical Path Management

    The critical path is the longest sequence of tasks in a project. Delays on the critical path will also delay project…

    8 条评论
  • How’s the new team member working out?

    How’s the new team member working out?

    When you add a new member to your project team, it’s a good idea to evaluate their performance so you can address any…

    3 条评论
  • Learning from Resistance to Change

    Learning from Resistance to Change

    Resistance to change is a frustrating and common aspect of project management. Resisting takes energy, which means…

    7 条评论
  • Simulating Success: Transforming Project Management Training with Games

    Simulating Success: Transforming Project Management Training with Games

    Would you like to expand your project management skills and experience or that of the project managers in your…

    7 条评论
  • A Tip for Introverted Project Managers: Your team probably likes you that way.

    A Tip for Introverted Project Managers: Your team probably likes you that way.

    With all the people skills project managers need, introverts might worry that they won’t be able to manage projects…

    11 条评论
  • Make the Most of Opportunities in Risk Management

    Make the Most of Opportunities in Risk Management

    To most people risk has a negative connotation. In risk management, opportunities are the bright side of risk.

    8 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了