How to Use the MIT AI Risk Repository for Practical AI Governance

AI is evolving quickly, transforming industries at an unprecedented pace. With these rapid advancements comes a growing need for thoughtful governance to manage the risks that AI can introduce. The MIT AI Risk Repository(https://airisk.mit.edu ) is a valuable resource for AI leaders and executives, offering a collection of AI-related risk scenarios to address the unique challenges of AI governance, such as managing ethical risks, ensuring compliance, and mitigating unintended consequences. In this piece, I will break down what the MIT AI Risk Repository offers, critically analyze its strengths and limitations, and provide practical guidance on how AI leaders can leverage it to build effective governance frameworks.

What Exactly Is the MIT AI Risk Repository?

The MIT AI Risk Repository is a curated, open-access collection of potential risks that businesses and researchers might encounter when developing or deploying AI. These risks are drawn from a mix of academic research, industry reports, and real-world case studies, making it a comprehensive resource that aims to help AI leaders identify, assess, and prioritize risks.

This repository is significant because it is the first comprehensive list of AI risks compiled in one place. It is completely open to use and contribution, which gives it the best chance to stay up to date as AI evolves. By welcoming input from both academia and industry, the repository aims to provide the most current understanding of AI risks and mitigation strategies. The goal is to clearly track AI risks as they occur and document mitigation strategies, helping AI leaders stay informed and adapt their governance practices.

To access the repository, simply visit airisk.mit.edu .

The Practical Taxonomy of AI Risks

One of the most useful features of the MIT AI Risk Repository is its interactive taxonomy for categorizing risks. This taxonomy allows AI leaders to explore risks systematically, making it easier to identify and understand potential challenges relevant to their specific use cases. There are two main types of taxonomies featured:

1. Causal Taxonomy: This taxonomy classifies risks based on three main dimensions—Entity, Intent, and Timing. The Entity dimension helps determine whether a risk originates from humans or AI systems, the Intent dimension helps classify whether the risk was intentional or unintentional, and the Timing dimension distinguishes whether the risk occurs before or after deployment. This approach helps AI leaders classify risks clearly, whether they are caused by human errors, AI system limitations, or failures occurring during different stages of deployment.

2. Domain Taxonomy: The Domain Taxonomy categorizes risks into seven major risk areas, allowing AI leaders to drill down to specific examples of each type. These risk areas include:

- Discrimination & Toxicity: Risks related to biased outcomes or harmful content that could lead to discrimination or toxicity in interactions.

- Privacy & Security: Risks involving data breaches, adversarial attacks, and misuse of personal data, focusing on ensuring data integrity, confidentiality, and security.

- Misinformation: Risks involving the generation or spread of false information, leading to societal harm or damage to an organization's reputation.

- Malicious Actors & Misuse: Risks associated with bad actors intentionally using AI for harmful purposes, such as fraud, cyberattacks, or spreading disinformation.

- Human-Computer Interaction: Risks related to usability and user experience, which can impact how effectively and safely humans interact with AI systems.

- Socioeconomic & Environmental Harms: Broader risks that AI may contribute to, such as job displacement, economic inequality, or environmental impact.

- AI System Safety, Failures, and Limitations: Technical risks such as software bugs, hardware malfunctions, and limitations that lead to system failures or unsafe behaviors.

Among these categories, the most widely applicable to many organizations are Discrimination & Toxicity, Privacy & Security, and Misinformation. The interactive nature of this taxonomy allows AI leaders to explore these categories in depth, using specific examples to understand potential real-world applications and scenarios.

Which Risks Matter for You?

Not all risks in the MIT AI Risk Repository are relevant to every organization or AI application. The repository is comprehensive, but this also means that many risks are context-specific.

For most enterprises that use a mix of third-party AI tools, develop some customized AI applications in-house, and build traditional AI models like fraud detection, the first three categories—Discrimination & Toxicity, Privacy & Security, and Misinformation—are the most widely applicable. These categories focus on ensuring that your AI tools, applications, and models produce "good" output: output that is accurate, not harmful, not biased, and that respects privacy by not leaking personally identifiable information (PII) or breaking confidentiality.

The fourth category, Malicious Actors & Misuse, focuses on people intentionally creating harmful outcomes using AI technology. This category is more applicable to creators of wide-scale AI technology who need to consider how their tools could be misused. For enterprises, this serves as a reminder to lock down access to your technology with robust authentication mechanisms, such as multi-factor authentication (MFA) or role-based access control (RBAC), to ensure that only authorized individuals can use your custom applications and models.

The final three categories—Human-Computer Interaction, Socioeconomic & Environmental Harms, and AI System Safety, Failures, and Limitations—are primarily applicable to policymakers and creators of foundational AI models that will have massive scale and adoption. For enterprises, these risks are less relevant unless they are developing AI technologies intended for widespread public use. Therefore, AI leaders in enterprises should prioritize adapting the repository's content to ensure it aligns with their specific needs and context.

Practical Steps to Use the MIT AI Risk Repository

1. Educate Your AI Governance and Leadership Teams: Have your AI governance leaders and AI leaders educate themselves using the interactive taxonomy in the repository. This will help them understand the different types of risks and how they apply to various AI use cases.

2. Download and Customize the Repository: Download the repository and ask your team to create a customized version that is relevant to the applications, technology, and use cases at your organization. This ensures that the content is directly applicable to your specific needs.

3. Create a Custom Bot for Access: Build a custom AI bot on top of your customized version to make the information easily accessible to your larger leadership team as a resource. This will help ensure that AI risks are well understood across the organization.

4. Contribute Back to the Community: If your organization encounters a new risk, contribute to the repository to share the information. This helps enhance the collective knowledge base and benefits others in the AI community.

Final Thoughts

AI is rapidly changing the world, presenting both significant risks and tremendous opportunities. The MIT AI Risk Repository serves as a valuable resource for understanding potential pitfalls, offering comprehensive scenarios, frameworks, and case studies that help AI leaders develop resilient governance practices, mitigate risks, and build trust in AI systems.

However, it's important not to focus solely on the risks. To truly harness AI's transformative power, we also need a repository of its benefits—one that highlights how AI can be used responsibly to improve lives, solve complex problems, and create value across industries. For instance, AI is being used to improve healthcare through early disease detection, enable individuals with disabilities to perform full functions in life and work, and personalize education to enhance learning outcomes. Balancing risk mitigation with an appreciation for AI's opportunities will help us fully realize its potential.

---

If you like this content, subscribe to yuying.substack.com to have ongoing access to my full content library.

---

For a monthly AI overview, checkout my podcast AI Afterhours on Youtube , Spotify , and Apple podcasts with co-host Polly M Allen .