How to use carbide end mills for heat resistant super alloys (HRSA)?
Understanding cutting conditions and possibilities in the HRSA finishing process

How to use carbide end mills for heat resistant super alloys (HRSA)? Understanding cutting conditions and possibilities in the HRSA finishing process

Carbide end mills are widely used in the finishing processes of heat-resistant superalloy (HRSA) raw materials, such as titanium, nickel, and cobalt alloys. These materials are commonly used in aerospace, medical, and energy industries, where high strength, corrosion resistance, and temperature stability are required. However, machining HRSA materials poses many challenges, such as high cutting forces, tool wear, thermal shock, and vibration. Therefore, selecting the appropriate carbide end mill and cutting conditions is crucial for achieving high productivity, quality, and tool life.

In this blog post, we will discuss some of the factors that affect the performance of carbide end mills in HRSA finishing operations, and provide some recommendations for optimal cutting parameters and strategies.

Factors affecting carbide end mill performance in HRSA finishing

The performance of carbide end mills in HRSA finishing depends on several factors, such as:

  • Tool geometry: The shape and design of the carbide end mill influence the cutting forces, chip formation, heat generation, and tool deflection. For example, a larger helix angle reduces the radial force and improves the chip evacuation, but also increases the axial force and the risk of chatter. A smaller corner radius reduces the stress concentration and improves the surface finish, but also increases the cutting temperature and the tool wear. A variable pitch or variable helix design reduces the vibration and noise but also increases the manufacturing cost and complexity.
  • Tool coating: The coating of the carbide end mill affects the friction, wear resistance, heat dissipation, and chemical stability of the tool. For example, a TiAlN coating reduces the friction coefficient and increases the hardness and thermal stability of the tool, but also increases the tendency of built-up edge formation. A diamond coating provides excellent wear resistance and low friction but also increases the brittleness and cost of the tool.
  • Cutting parameters: The cutting speed, feed rate, depth of cut, and width of cut determine the material removal rate, power consumption, surface finish, and tool life. For example, a higher cutting speed reduces the cutting time and improves the surface finish, but also increases the cutting temperature and tool wear. A higher feed rate increases the material removal rate and productivity but also increases the cutting forces and vibration. A larger depth of cut or width of cut reduces the number of passes and improves the efficiency, but also increases the stress and deflection on the tool.
  • Cutting strategy: The cutting strategy refers to the path planning, tool path generation, and tool engagement control of the carbide end mill. For example, a trochoidal milling strategy reduces the radial engagement and chip thickness of the tool, which allows for higher feed rates and depths of cut without increasing the cutting forces or temperature. A high-speed machining strategy uses constant or adaptive feed rates to maintain a constant chip load on the tool, which improves the surface quality and tool life.

Recommendations for optimal cutting parameters and strategies in HRSA finishing

Based on the above factors, we can provide some general guidelines for selecting the optimal cutting parameters and strategies for carbide end mills in HRSA finishing operations:

  • Tool geometry: Choose a carbide end mill with a large helix angle (35° to 45°), a small corner radius (0.2 to 0.4 mm), a variable pitch or variable helix design, and a suitable number of flutes (2 to 4) depending on the material hardness and chip space.
  • Tool coating: Choose a carbide end mill with a TiAlN or diamond coating for high wear resistance and thermal stability. Avoid using uncoated or TiN-coated tools for HRSA materials.
  • Cutting parameters: Choose a low to moderate cutting speed (50 to 150 m/min), a high feed rate (0.05 to 0.3 mm/tooth), a small depth of cut (0.5 to 1 mm) and a small width of cut (10% to 30% of tool diameter) for HRSA finishing. Adjust these parameters according to the material properties, tool geometry, and machine capabilities.
  • Cutting strategy: Choose a trochoidal milling or high-speed machining strategy for HRSA finishing. Avoid using conventional milling or slotting strategies that cause high radial engagement or chip thickness on the tool.

Conclusion

Carbide end mills are effective tools for finishing HRSA materials, but they require careful selection and optimization of tool geometry, coating, cutting parameters, and strategy. By following these recommendations, you can achieve high productivity, quality, and tool life in your HRSA finishing operations.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Osman Yesildemir的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了