How tertiary educational institutions should heed the lessons of COVID
Photby the author

How tertiary educational institutions should heed the lessons of COVID

There is a sense that the world is slowly returning to normal. Sure, we have war in Eastern Europe, inflation, which we have not seen for decades, is back, and we are still suffering a crisis in supply chains, but our daily lives are starting to feel recognisable. We have begun again to enjoy cafes, restaurants, live music, and performances, as well as our beloved sporting events.

As the saying goes, however, a good crisis should never be wasted. We should not see the global pandemic as an event never to be repeated, rather as a lesson that highlights our vulnerabilities and strengths.

No industry sector should learn more from the global pandemic than the education sector. Having spent two decades working with universities, here are the five lessons our educational institutions should take away from the pandemic.

1.?????Online platforms are fundamental

The forced closure of campuses meant that students all over the world were left stranded at home. Most institutions quickly moved their learning and teaching online. Universities kicked aside the many bureaucratic procedures that slow innovation to provide the student body with a new way of learning.

As this happened, those universities that responded best realised the importance of both updating and maintaining their online platforms. Just as important was the empowering of staff through recognition, reward, and training.

Today, post the pandemic, most students expect a hybrid approach in their education journey. The appropriate investment in online platforms makes this possible.

While there is no doubt this presents huge challenges, it also provides universities with the opportunity to be innovative and improve their online learning offerings for current and future cohorts.

2.?????Class counts

In a famous essay written eight years ago, author Tim Winton discusses the concept of ‘class’ in Australia which, he argues, is rarely mentioned. While both schools and universities worked hard to move teaching online, and in some cases did an outstanding job, the truth is that there was no equity in access.

All too frequently assumptions were made that each family has access to one laptop per child, high-quality Wi-Fi, and that there were locations at home that were conducive to study. Many families did not have this luxury.

Further, the amount of support parents could offer varied significantly. Some parents understood the challenging journey of an university education, while others had no idea. As the first member of my family to attend university, I could not imagine my parents truly understanding just how challenging this would have been.

This also played out in the professions and educational experience of parents. Some students had the luxury of parents working from home so did not have to wear the responsibility of caring for siblings, while others struggled to have any income.

3.?????The value of community

The community of support around you is fundamental. When we moved into lockdown and had to isolate, we learned the challenges of staying indoors and avoiding physical contact with other people. Those with strong community ties could support each other in these times – even if only virtually.

The institutions that responded best were the ones that kept regular communication with both staff and students: updating them on the status of the situation, finding ways to utilise digital platforms to facilitate human connections and provide support for those isolated.

Nowhere was this more important than for international students who were all but abandoned by the then federal government.

It was not only the federal government that failed on this front. For too long, many universities have treated international students as ‘cash cows’ and focused more on recruitment than on their educational journey. The international students left here had little ties with either the broader university community or even their local diaspora.

4.?????Good educators need to be rewarded

Ten years ago, I was awarded the nation’s most prestigious teaching award: The Prime Minister’s University Teacher of the Year. Along with the award and a photograph with the then Prime Minister, I received substantial funds.

A colleague pulled me aside and advised me that I should utilise the award money to, ‘buy myself out of teaching’ and concentrate on my research.

Herein lies the problem with universities: good teaching is not as respected as much as research. Universities treat teaching as a secondary priority to research: promotion through teaching is almost impossible. In contrast, a research track record will get you there. There is no ‘sabbatical’ for teaching, or for improving your teaching materials. So, you are rewarded for successful research by being required to do less teaching. This is fundamentally wrong.

Financial compensation counts, but there is a need for a cultural shift in the way good teaching is recognised. Universities can address this by adopting policies that reward good teaching. That may include rewarding the production of innovative teaching materials, in the same way, that research publications are treated.

5.?????The value of international connections

The pandemic highlighted the extent of the international interconnectedness of higher education. As the borders shut, not only did the value of international students become apparent, but so did the research partnerships that drive innovation. Travel bans meant established research projects had to be abandoned and careers stalled, or stagnated, as networks could not be developed.

The rapid development of COVID vaccines underlined the value of international collaborations, and the need to foster them. Hybrid conferences are valuable and should remain, however, it is longer-term exchanges that matter. They have the greatest impact. Students, or researchers, gain from the ability to build deep cultural and working relationships on a global level. It does make a real difference.

The pandemic taught us that we could respond quickly in the face of a crisis. The challenge now is not to forget those lessons and allow systemic inertia to seep back in. If we do, a good crisis will certainly have been wasted.

Note; This article was originally published for Neos Kosmos and is available here...

Tanya Rutherford

??Social Entrepreneur | Learn Grow Become & ?? Queen Be | Empowering learners and midlife/menopausal women to thrive. Providing safe, sovereign support from Darumbal Country, Rockhampton Region.

2 年

Definitely! We need to keep evolving and building on the strengths from Covid, not go "backwards". And yes, great teachers change the world (and more worlds) than perhaps any other profession!!

回复
Dr Cali Prince

Academic Educator, Curriculum Writer, Cultural Researcher: Ethnography, Arts Based Research, Performance (Auto)Ethnography, Poetic Inquiry

2 年

100% James - love this "there is a need for a cultural shift in the way good teaching is recognised. Universities can address this by adopting policies that reward good teaching. That may include rewarding the production of innovative teaching materials, in the same way, that research publications are treated."

Mike Lanzing

Retired Head of Business Development | Sales Leadership | Stakeholder Management | Sales Strategy | MBA

2 年

Some great points

Maqsood Al-Kabir

International public speaker - Negotiator - Convenor of major events - Senior Executive skills and leadership.

2 年

Insightful and interesting… thank you James!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了