How to Tell Facts About the Debt From Political Hype
Photo: Getty Images

How to Tell Facts About the Debt From Political Hype

Recent remarks by Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, have turned the spotlight back to the U.S.'s $18 trillion federal government debt. The attention follows a period of substantial decline in the budget deficit that countered claims the country was heading rapidly toward debt Armageddon.

Here are key facts to remember as you assess what is likely to be a loud and contentious political conversation on debt:

  1. There are five major ways to reduce the burden of debt: by growing faster, thus generating incremental resources for debt servicing while maintaining and enhancing living standards; by raising more tax revenue and earmarking it for debt repayment; by cutting government spending and diverting the funds to higher debt servicing, including prepayments; by defaulting on contractual debt terms; and through financial engineering that captures interest-rate arbitrage opportunities, buys back debt cheaply, improves the mix of issued securities and delivers greater financial efficiency.
  1. There are practical limitations to the ability of these approaches to deliver big results in the short run. As a result, there is no realistic, orderly manner to eliminate the stock of national debt within just a few years. Default is extremely costly, disrupting both public and private capital flows while sharply increasing borrowing costs. There is a limit to what financial engineering -- a strategy that is gradual and opportunistic -- can achieve. Significant fiscal adjustment, be it via sharply higher tax rates for almost everyone or draconian expenditure cuts, risks devastating growth and rendering the overall debt burden even harder to sustain. And it is not easy to generate an immediate growth spurt, especially when the world economy is fighting structural headwinds.
  1. Given the other ailments of the post-recession economy, it isn't easy to argue that a sharp reduction in the national debt should be an immediate, standalone priority, and it does not belong among the three top urgent economic goals for the next administration. Although the longer-term trajectory of debt should be kept under close scrutiny and contained, there is no evidence that the U.S.'s existing stock of federal debt is a major problem. Borrowing costs are extremely low. The U.S. has access to abundant financing. And unlike many developing countries, it has historically issued almost no debt that is denominated in a foreign currency.
  1. The focus on debt should not divert attention from the need for greater infrastructure spending, both through public projects and public-private partnerships. The potential gains far exceed the incremental cost of debt servicing, especially with such low interest rates. Infrastructure shortfalls are already holding back productivity, cutting into actual and potential growth and, in some cases, causing social difficulties.
  1. The best way to deal with the country’s debt is by unleashing the higher and more inclusive growth that the U.S. is capable of, and by bolstering its future potential. This involves addressing structural impediments to growth, not just by plugging infrastructure gaps but also through pro-growth tax reform and better labor market retooling. It also requires countering the excessive worsening of inequality, which aggravates the problem of deficient aggregate demandby channeling the incremental income to the rich who have a lower marginal propensity to consume. In addition, steps should be taken expand the options for alleviating the crushing burden of student debt and to lead a more effective global policy coordination effort.

Rather than a narrow focus on federal debt, the presidential candidates need to lead a national economic debate on the comprehensive growth strategy that Congress should be implementing. Otherwise, political polarization on Capitol Hill will  further undermine the country’s growth performance, erode future potential, and turn debt from mere fodder for political sound bites to a hard-to-solve problem for future generations.

This post originally appeared on Bloomberg View.

Mohamed A. El-Erian is the former CEO/co-CIO of PIMCO. He is Chief Economic Advisor at Allianz and member of its International Executive Committee, Chair of President Obama’s Global Development Council and author of the NYT/WSJ bestseller “When Markets Collide.” His most recent book, “The Only Game in Town: Central Bank, Instability and Avoiding the Next Collapse,”is also a NYT bestseller and is available now. 

Follow him on Twitter: @elerianmAnd get all of his content on Facebook.

Young John

Retired at Not employed now

8 年

Lowering the deficit will not reduce the debt. As long as there IS a deficit, the debt will keep getting bigger. Having a surplus can reduce the debt, but only if the government doesn't using it for something besides reducing the debt.

回复
Brian O'Sullivan

President - The O'Sullivan Group, Inc

8 年

Running a country is like running a business or a household. Unproductive debt is bad. All of the US debt is unproductive. It is from overspending. It is not debt from investment. It is not debt to purchase an appreciating asset. The idea of not getting rid on US debt is insanity motivated by politics and institutions that benefit from debt and federal overspending.

回复
John T Kelly

Channel Synergy

8 年

Our economy depends upon preparation for war and occasional refreshing through blood, mostly that of others. Blood for oil never seemed a bad idea to Cheney.

回复
Alan Ross

CEO at AR Trading

8 年

Mohammad, All be it partially correct that our debt can only be reduced by grown, our grow cannot happen withour the rates si low. Raise our rates and our economy drops. Trump is right.

回复
Erik Stone

KI IT Field Engineer, NSAM IT at Kaplan Intl Colleges US

8 年

Hey Tony, you nailed it. These individuals are corrupt but not stupid. None of these so called government representatives are stupid or incompetent. But rather political and financially controlled minions who will cooperate with foreign plans to end America's chance at true Democratic Republic with marked gains toward a future of political and financial prosperity all Americans. Just look at American Unemployment. Hey Dominik, You got it is systematic approach to a bigger plan of a disenfranchised state.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了