How to Slay the Four Horsemen of the Mandated Return to Office
Entrepreneurs' Organization
We create connection and belonging for entrepreneurs everywhere so that together, we can become even more.
As more and more companies require employees to return to the office, they run into the buzzsaw of what I think of as the “Four Horsemen of the Required Return to Office”— specifically, challenges with resistance, attrition,?quiet quitting, and diversity.
Resistance
The Four Horsemen stem from the fact that workers who are?capable of working remotely?prefer to do so for most or all of the time. Thus, workers facing inflexible return-to-office mandates show?resistance, the first of the Four Horsemen. For example, when GM?announced?that all salaried employees would have to return to the office three days a week, it sparked intense employee backlash. This led to GM?walking back?its requirements and delaying any required return to office.
In a?survey, Gartner found that only 3% of companies would fire noncompliant employees, and only 30% would have HR talk to those who don’t show up. Large US banks trying to force employees back to the office are meeting with?high rates?of up to 50% noncompliance. And many other employees are?showing up?for a part of the workday, from 10am to 2pm.
Attrition
Given this resistance, some workers simply quit, joining the Great Resignation—making?attrition?the second of the Four Horsemen. That includes top-level executives: Ian Goodfellow, who led machine learning at Apple,?quit?in protest over Apple’s mandated three-days-a-week return to office. European banks, which offer?more flexible?hybrid work policies, are using their flexible policies to lure talented staff from less flexible US banks. Smaller and more flexible financial planning firms are?headhunting?financial planners in larger and less flexible companies.
Quiet Quitting
Perhaps even more dangerous than resistance and attrition is the third of the Four Horsemen,?quiet quitting.?Quiet quitting?can be worse than the much more obvious resistance or attrition, since quiet quitting rots a company’s culture from within. Gallup research?finds?that “the optimal engagement boost occurs when employees spend 60% to 80% of their time—or three to four days in a five-day workweek—working off-site.” Forcing employees to come to the office under the threat of discipline leads to disengagement, fear and distrust,?according?to Ben Wigert, director of research and strategy for workplace management at Gallup.
领英推荐
Loss of Diversity
The final of the Four Horsemen relates to the serious?loss of diversity?associated with the mandated office return.?A Future Forum survey?found that 21% of all White knowledge workers wanted a return to full-time in-office work, but only 3% of all Black knowledge workers wanted the same. Why? Because Black professionals still suffer from?discrimination and microaggressions?in the office. Companies that are less flexible have DEI staff?ringing alarm bells?about how the desire for remote work among underrepresented groups threatens?diversity goals.
How to Slay Them
In working with?my clients?who wish to bring their employees back to the office to slay the Four Horsemen, I find a combination of strategies to be crucial. Before launching an office return, we consider compensation policies. A June 2022?survey?by the Society for Human Resources reports that to get employees to stay at a hybrid job with a 30-minute commute, they would need a pay raise of 10%.?Research?by Owl Labs suggests that it costs an average of US$863/month for the average office worker to commute to work versus working from home, which costs about half that, US$432/month, for utilities, office supplies and so on. That data helped my clients develop a fair compensation plan that paid staff a higher salary if they spent more time in the office. Doing so helped address the first two Horsemen, resistance and attrition.
Addressing quiet quitting requires working to improve culture and feelings of belonging, such as through retreats with fun?team-building exercises. Another idea centered on helping staff address burnout, such as by providing mental health benefits. To help prevent diversity losses, as well as facilitate underrepresented groups moving forward on their career paths, it’s valuable to create a formal?mentoring program?with a special focus on underrepresented staff.
So if you and your leadership team are committed to returning to a mostly or fully in-person workforce, remember that you need to watch out for—and defeat—the Four Horsemen. Make a plan in advance, and determine how you will?overcome these problems?before they threaten the success of your return-to-office plan.
Contributed to EO by?Dr. Gleb Tsipursky, who helps EO members seize competitive advantage in hybrid work by driving employee retention, collaboration, and innovation through behavioral science as the CEO of the future-proofing consultancy?Disaster Avoidance Experts, and authored the best-seller?Leading Hybrid and Remote Teams: A Manual on Benchmarking to Best Practices for Competitive Advantage.
For more insights and inspiration from today’s leading entrepreneurs, check out?EO on Inc.?and more articles from the?EO blog.?
See the source here.
President | Executive Recruiter | Guaranteed Placements | Where Innovation Meets Tradition
1 年My favorite piece of this article is the last paragraph in which the author notes... "Make a plan in advance, and determine how you will?overcome these problems?before they threaten the success of your return-to-office plan." As a Professional Recruiter, I represent clients who have mandated 'back to office work' and have seen first-hand the immense difficulties it brings from a Talent Acquisitions standpoint. And yet, most of the time, no "plan" was created or executed before making this mandate, and they're left scrambling to overcome these hardships "after the fact."