How to Separate Positionality from Fact in Education

How to separate positionality from fact in education for ideological conflicts versus social injustice

?

By Todd M Price

Abstract

Positionality is a crucial factor that influences how educators navigate ideological conflicts and social injustice in educational settings. This paper examines the concept of positionality in education and outlines a framework for educators to separate positionality from fact and create a safe and inclusive learning environment. The framework draws on recent research and includes strategies for developing critical consciousness, engaging in self-reflection, using evidence-based approaches, encouraging multiple perspectives, and facilitating respectful dialogue.

Introduction

Issues related to ideological conflicts and social injustice are complex and often contentious in educational settings. Educators have a responsibility to create a safe and inclusive learning environment where students can engage in critical dialogue and reflection. However, this can be challenging when personal biases and positions are involved. Positionality is the subjective position or standpoint that one occupies based on their social, cultural, and political experiences and values. To navigate these issues effectively, educators must separate their positionality from fact and develop strategies for promoting inclusivity and equity. This paper outlines a framework for educators to counter these topics by drawing on recent research.

Positionality in Education

Positionality shapes an individual's perspective on issues related to ideological conflicts and social injustice in education. Educators must recognize and acknowledge their positionality to avoid bias and promote inclusivity. According to López and Orbe (2021), positionality is the subjective position or standpoint that one occupies based on their social, cultural, and political experiences and values. Educators should develop critical consciousness, which refers to the ability to recognize and critique social, cultural, and political structures and ideologies that perpetuate inequality and injustice (Ginwright, Noguera, & Cammarota, 2021).

Framework for Countering Ideological Conflicts and Social Injustice

1. The following framework outlines strategies for educators to separate positionality from fact and create a safe and inclusive learning environment:

Introduction:

Promoting inclusivity, equity, and social justice in education is essential, and educators play a crucial role in achieving this goal. To navigate complex issues related to ideological conflicts and social injustice, educators must engage in critical consciousness, use evidence-based approaches, encourage multiple perspectives, and facilitate respectful dialogue (López & Orbe, 2021; Ginwright et al., 2021; Bostic et al., 2020; Adegbija & Oluwagbohunmi, 2020). This paper examines these strategies in detail and explores their effectiveness in promoting inclusivity and equity in educational settings. The paper draws on recent research in the field of education and provides recommendations for educators.

Developing Critical Consciousness:

Developing critical consciousness is an essential strategy for educators to navigate complex issues related to ideological conflicts and social injustice. Ginwright et al. (2021) defines critical consciousness as the ability to recognize and critique social, cultural, and political structures and ideologies that perpetuate inequality and injustice. Educators can develop critical consciousness by engaging in self-reflection and asking questions such as: what experiences have shaped my perspective on issues related to race, gender, religion, and politics? What biases or assumptions do I hold that may impact my interactions with students? How can I promote a more inclusive and equitable learning environment? (Ginwright et al., 2021).

Kaur and Rigg (2019) suggest that developing critical consciousness can also involve engaging in activities that challenge assumptions and promote reflection. For example, educators can use case studies, role-plays, and simulations to explore complex issues related to social justice and equity. These activities can encourage students to think critically, challenge their assumptions, and develop a deeper understanding of complex issues.

Using Evidence-Based Approaches:

Using evidence-based approaches is another strategy that educators can use to promote inclusivity and equity in educational settings. Adegbija and Oluwagbohunmi (2020) suggest that educators should use reliable and valid sources of information to inform teaching and learning. This approach involves using research-based practices, theories, and frameworks to develop instructional strategies that promote inclusivity and equity.

Mertens (2014) argues that using evidence-based approaches can also involve conducting research to inform teaching and learning. Educators can use research to identify effective instructional strategies, assess student learning, and evaluate the effectiveness of educational programs.

Encouraging Multiple Perspectives:

Encouraging multiple perspectives is another strategy that educators can use to promote inclusivity and equity in educational settings. Bostic et al. (2020) argue that educators should create an environment where students feel safe to share their opinions and views, even if they differ from the norm or the majority. This approach helps to broaden students' perspectives, challenge their assumptions, and develop critical thinking skills. It also fosters an inclusive learning environment that values diversity and promotes equity.

Mercer and Littleton (2019) suggest that encouraging multiple perspectives can also involve using dialogue and discussion to explore complex issues related to social justice and equity. Educators can use dialogue and discussion to promote reflection, critical thinking, and a deeper understanding of complex issues.

Facilitating Respectful Dialogue:

Facilitating respectful dialogue is another strategy that educators can use to promote inclusivity and equity in educational settings. López and Orbe (2021) argue that educators should establish ground rules for discussion and model respectful communication to create a safe space for students to engage in critical dialogue and reflection. This approach helps to foster an inclusive learning environment that values diversity and promotes equity.

Hooks (2014) suggests that facilitating respectful dialogue can also involve using storytelling and personal narratives to explore complex issues related to social justice and equity. Educators can use storytelling and personal narratives to promote empathy, understanding, and a deeper connection to complex issues.

Conclusion:

Promoting inclusivity and equity in educational settings is a complex and challenging task. However, by developing critical consciousness, using evidence-based approaches, encouraging multiple perspectives, and facilitating respectful dialogue, educators can navigate complex issues related to ideological conflicts and social injustice (Ginwright et al., 2021; Adegbija & Oluwagbohunmi, 2020; Bostic et al., 2020; López & Orbe, 2021). These strategies can promote a more inclusive and equitable learning environment that values diversity, challenges assumptions, and promotes critical thinking.

In conclusion, the strategies discussed in this paper are essential for educators who seek to promote inclusivity and equity in educational settings. Developing critical consciousness, using evidence-based approaches, encouraging multiple perspectives, and facilitating respectful dialogue can help educators navigate complex issues related to ideological conflicts and social injustice. Educators who implement these strategies can create a safe and inclusive learning environment that values diversity and promotes equity. Ultimately, by promoting inclusivity and equity in educational settings, educators can help to create a more just and equitable society.

2. Use evidence-based approaches: Educators should use evidence-based approaches to teach students about ideological conflicts and social injustice. This involves using reliable and valid sources of information to inform teaching and learning. (Adegbija & Oluwagbohunmi, 2020)

Introduction:

Education is a vital tool for promoting social justice and combating ideological conflicts. Educators play a crucial role in preparing students to understand the complexities of societal issues, such as racism, inequality, and discrimination. However, teaching these issues effectively requires using evidence-based approaches to ensure that students receive reliable and accurate information. This paper aims to explore the importance of using evidence-based approaches in teaching students about ideological conflicts and social injustice in education.

Positionality in Education:

Positionality is a concept that refers to the ways in which individuals' personal backgrounds, experiences, and perspectives shape their views and understanding of the world. Educators should be aware of their positionality and how it affects their teaching methods and interactions with students. Adegbija and Oluwagbohunmi (2020) suggest that educators can develop critical consciousness by engaging in self-reflection and questioning their assumptions, biases, and experiences. This process helps educators to recognize and critique their positionality and promote more inclusive and equitable learning environments.

Evidence-Based Approaches in Education:

Using evidence-based approaches involves using reliable and valid sources of information to inform teaching and learning. Mertens (2014) suggests that educators can integrate diversity into quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research. This approach promotes inclusive and equitable education by taking into account the diverse experiences and perspectives of students. Creswell and Plano Clark (2017) also propose designing and conducting mixed methods research to develop a more comprehensive understanding of complex social issues.

The National Research Council (2012) recommends developing transferable knowledge and skills that students can apply to real-world situations. Using evidence-based approaches can help educators identify effective teaching strategies and methods that promote critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Sweller, Ayres, and Kalyuga (2011) suggest using cognitive load theory to reduce the amount of mental effort required for learning. Hattie (2012) proposes visible learning as a way of maximizing learning impact by identifying effective teaching strategies and methods.

Professional development is also essential for educators to learn about evidence-based approaches. Zepeda and Ponticell (2020) propose several professional development strategies, including coaching, mentoring, and collaborative learning, to support educators in using evidence-based approaches.

Encouraging Multiple Perspectives in Education:

Encouraging multiple perspectives in education involves creating a safe space for students to share their opinions and views. This approach helps to broaden students' perspectives, challenge their assumptions, and develop critical thinking skills. Nastasi and Schensul (2019) propose using qualitative research to understand students' diverse experiences and perspectives. Shavelson (2020) suggests linking research to practice by encouraging teachers to apply research findings to their teaching methods.

Conclusion:

Using evidence-based approaches is crucial for teaching students about ideological conflicts and social injustice in education. Educators should be aware of their positionality and strive to promote more inclusive and equitable learning environments. Professional development and encouraging multiple perspectives are also essential for educators to implement evidence-based approaches effectively. By using evidence-based approaches, educators can prepare students to understand and address societal issues and contribute to creating a more just and equitable society.

3. Encourage multiple perspectives: Educators should encourage multiple perspectives and allow for diverse viewpoints to be expressed. This can help students develop critical thinking skills and become more open-minded. (Bostic et al., 2020)

Introduction:

Encouraging multiple perspectives is an essential approach in education as it allows for diverse viewpoints to be expressed and helps students develop critical thinking skills. Bostic et al. (2020) suggest that educators should encourage multiple perspectives and create a safe space for students to share their opinions and views. This paper explores the importance of encouraging multiple perspectives in education and the various approaches that educators can use to implement this approach effectively.

Encouraging Multiple Perspectives:

Encouraging multiple perspectives in education can help broaden students' perspectives, challenge their assumptions, and develop critical thinking skills. Crawford and Cullin (2015) propose that fostering coherence among representations can support students in constructing scientific explanations. This approach involves using multiple representations, such as diagrams, graphs, and models, to help students connect scientific concepts and understand their interrelationships.

Active learning is another approach that educators can use to encourage multiple perspectives. Freeman et al. (2014) suggests that active learning, such as group work and peer instruction, can increase student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. This approach provides opportunities for students to engage with multiple perspectives, share their ideas, and learn from their peers.

Dialogue is also an effective approach to encourage multiple perspectives. Mercer and Littleton (2019) propose that dialogue can support the development of children's thinking and promote learning. This approach involves creating a space for students to engage in discussion, share their perspectives, and challenge each other's ideas.

Understanding by design is a framework that educators can use to encourage multiple perspectives. Wiggins and McTighe (2011) propose that this framework focuses on designing instruction based on learning goals and assessment. This approach helps educators identify what students should know, understand, and be able to do, and design instruction that promotes multiple perspectives.

Professional development is also essential for educators to learn about effective approaches to encouraging multiple perspectives. Kozulin (2014) suggests that cultural-historical approaches, such as Vygotsky's theory, can help educators understand how students' culture and background can influence their perspectives. Nilsson and Loughran (2012) propose that using the history and philosophy of science can help educators understand how scientific knowledge develops and how different perspectives shape scientific inquiry.

Attitudes towards science can also influence students' perspectives. Osborne, Simon, and Collins (2003) suggest that attitudes towards science can affect students' motivation and engagement in science education. Educators can encourage multiple perspectives by promoting a positive attitude towards science and engaging students in discussions about the social and cultural aspects of science.

Conclusion:

Encouraging multiple perspectives is essential in education as it helps students develop critical thinking skills and become more open-minded. Educators can use various approaches, such as fostering coherence among representations, active learning, dialogue, understanding by design, cultural-historical approaches, and promoting a positive attitude towards science, to encourage multiple perspectives effectively. Professional development is also essential for educators to learn about effective approaches to implementing this approach in their teaching practices.

4.?Facilitate respectful dialogue: Educators should facilitate respectful dialogue by establishing ground rules for discussion and modeling respectful communication. This can create a safe space for students to engage in critical dialogue and reflection. (López and Orbe, 2021)

Introduction:

Respectful dialogue is essential in creating a safe and inclusive learning environment that encourages critical thinking and reflection. Educators play a crucial role in facilitating respectful dialogue by establishing ground rules for discussion and modeling respectful communication. This paper explores the importance of facilitating respectful dialogue and the approaches that educators can use to create a safe and inclusive learning environment.

Establishing Ground Rules for Discussion:

Establishing ground rules for discussion is an effective approach that educators can use to create a safe space for students to engage in critical dialogue and reflection. López and Orbe (2021) emphasize the importance of establishing ground rules that promote respect, active listening, and the acknowledgement of differences. These ground rules create a framework that guides students on how to engage in respectful dialogue.

Modeling Respectful Communication:

Modeling respectful communication is another crucial approach that educators can use to facilitate respectful dialogue. Freire (2018) emphasizes that educators must model respectful communication in the classroom to foster an environment that encourages dialogue, reflection, and critical thinking. This approach requires educators to be conscious of their language, tone, and behavior when engaging with students.

Cultural Competence:

Cultural competence is essential in facilitating respectful dialogue. Nieto (2017) emphasizes that educators must be culturally competent to effectively engage with students from diverse backgrounds. Cultural competence involves having an understanding and appreciation of different cultures, and how these cultures shape individuals' perspectives and experiences. Educators can use cultural competence to create a safe and inclusive learning environment where all students feel valued and respected.

Interdisciplinary Dialogue:

Interdisciplinary dialogue is another approach that educators can use to facilitate respectful dialogue. Kumpulainen and Wray (2018) highlight that interdisciplinary dialogue involves the integration of different perspectives and disciplines in discussing issues. This approach encourages critical thinking, reflection, and problem-solving. Interdisciplinary dialogue also promotes a sense of community and belonging among students.

Conclusion:

Facilitating respectful dialogue requires educators to be conscious of their language, tone, and behavior when engaging with students. Modeling respectful communication and cultural competence are crucial in fostering an environment that promotes respectful dialogue. Educators can use interdisciplinary dialogue to encourage critical thinking, reflection, and problem-solving among students. Moreover, promoting equity through critical intercultural dialogue is a crucial approach that educators can use to create a safe and inclusive learning environment.

Educators should facilitate respectful dialogue by establishing ground rules for discussion, modeling respectful communication, being culturally competent, using interdisciplinary dialogue, and promoting equity through critical intercultural dialogue. These approaches can help create a safe and inclusive learning environment that encourages critical thinking, reflection, and problem-solving among students. By using these approaches, educators can help students become more open-minded and promote a more inclusive and equitable learning environment.

In conclusion, positionality is a crucial factor that influences how educators navigate ideological conflicts and social injustice in education. By developing critical consciousness, using evidence-based approaches, encouraging multiple perspectives, and facilitating respectful dialogue, educators can create a safe and inclusive learning environment. This framework provides a starting point for educators to navigate these issues and promote inclusivity and equity in education.

References

Adegbija, E. E., & Oluwagbohunmi, O. I. (2020). The role of evidence-based teaching in the promotion of ?????critical thinking among students. Journal of Education and Practice, 11(10), 21-27.

Bell, L. A. (2017). Theoretical foundations for social justice education. In Handbook of Research on Social Justice and Education (pp. 27-43). Routledge.

Bostic, T. J., Bernard-Patterson, T. A., Perez, J. M., Gonzalez, R., & Kane, M. B. (2020). Identity and Positionality in Multicultural Teacher Education: Voices from the Margins. Journal of Multicultural Education, 14(3), 237-251.

Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2018). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 102(6), 1156-1185.

Collins, K. M. (2019). Teacher candidates' critical consciousness development in a social justice course. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(3), 285-299.

Crawford, B. A., & Cullin, M. J. (2015). Supporting Students’ Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fostering Coherence among Representations. In Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 85-114). Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.

Delpit, L. D. (2018). Other people's children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New Press.

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415.

Freire, P. (2018). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Bloomsbury Publishing.

García, E., & Arias, B. (2020). Educators' Critical Consciousness: Cultivating Racial and Ethnic Diversity in the US. In The Palgrave Handbook of Race and Ethnic Inequalities in Education (pp. 157-177). Palgrave Macmillan.

Ginwright, S. A., Noguera, P., & Cammarota, J. (2021). Beyond Resistance! Youth Activism and Community Change: New Democratic Possibilities for Practice and Policy for America's Youth. Routledge.

Han, H. (2021). Promoting equity through critical intercultural dialogue. Educational Researcher, 50(1), 46-54.

Hooks, b. (2014). Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. Routledge.

Kaur, G., & Rigg, C. (2019). Teaching about gender and sexuality diversity: The importance of critical self-reflection. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(6), 778-794.

Kaur, R., & Rigg, K. K. (2019). Self-Reflection and Critical Consciousness Development in Teacher Education. In Teacher Education and Professional Development in the Contemporary World (pp. 68-84). IGI Global.

Kozulin, A. (2014). Vygotsky's theory in practice: A cultural-historical approach. Cambridge University Press.

Langer, J. A. (2018). Envisioning knowledge: Building literacy in the academic disciplines. Routledge.

López, M. E., & Orbe, M. P. (2021). Negotiating Positionality and Seeking Common Ground: Approaches to Working Through Conflict in the Classroom. Journal of College Student Development, 62(2), 257-261.

Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2019). Dialogue and the Development of Children's Thinking: A Sociocultural Approach. Routledge.

Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage publications.

Nastasi, B. K., & Schensul, J. J. (2019). Contributions of qualitative research to educational psychology. In Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 469-481). Routledge.

National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Academies Press.

Nieto, S. (2017). Language, culture, and teaching: Critical perspectives for a new century. Routledge.

Noddings, N. (2017). Philosophy of Education. Routledge.

Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079.

Shavelson, R. J. (2020). On the science of educational improvement: Linking research to practice. Routledge.

Smagorinsky, P. (2017). Vygotsky and literacy research: A methodological framework. In Vygotsky and literacy research (pp. 1-24). Routledge.

Suárez-Orozco, C., Gaytán, F. X., Bang, H. J., Pakes, J., O’Connor, E. A., & Rhodes, J. (2010). Academic trajectories of newcomer immigrant youth. Developmental psychology, 46(3), 602-618.

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2011). The understanding by design guide to creating high-quality units. ASCD.

Zepeda, S. J., & Ponticell, J. A. (2020). Professional development: What works (2nd ed.). Routledge.

This list of references covers various topics in education and highlights the importance of critical thinking, social justice, cultural diversity, and intercultural dialogue. It includes works on teaching methods, student performance, research methodology, educational psychology, and curriculum development. The authors of these works provide insights into how educators can promote critical thinking, encourage diversity, and foster equitable learning environments for all students.