How Science is Advancing the Art of Filmmaking to Meet 21st Century Audience Expectations Consistently

How Science is Advancing the Art of Filmmaking to Meet 21st Century Audience Expectations Consistently

Digital technology enables neuroscientists and media psychologists to decode storytelling and real-time moviegoer experience and identify patterns of audience engagement. This form of data (the science of filmmaking) can be fused with the art of filmmaking to optimise audience engagement in movies, commercials and video games.

Thereby, meeting/exceeding consumer expectations without compromising filmmakers or video games designers’ creativity. Moreover, by synthesising science with the art of filmmaking increases returns because it eliminates filmmakers’ ‘narrative blind spots’ they are unaware of that decrease audience engagement.

Changing Viewing Habits

Filmmakers are finding it harder to capture and sustain our attention because more people are consuming movies on a PC tablet and smartphone. This consumer behaviour has partly been driven by Netflix, Amazon and Hulu, who provide online streaming services that enable consumers to watch movies and television programmes on a PC tablet and smartphone, 24/7 anytime and anyplace.

This means that viewers have more options (screen sizes) to watch a movie and are no longer confined to the big screen in the cinema. Furthermore, 72% of the largest moviegoer age group (18-24 yrs) own a PC tablet, the most popular mobile device to watch movies across all age groups (MPAA, 2016; Accenture, 2013).

However, watching a movie on a tablet can reduce attention because they are prone to external environmental distractions, especially in public places and when travelling. This means that when the viewing experience is disrupted it generates a fragmented narrative (Pasman, 2011), rather than a continuous narrative intended by the filmmaker.

Additionally, our dependence on the internet and obsession with smartphones has led to multi screen viewing, where viewers simultaneously watch content on television, tablet and smartphone. This places additional demands on filmmakers to optimise attention and engagement consistently.

Therefore, it is crucial filmmakers adopt new approaches to filmmaking that will enable them to align their creative vision with audience expectations and real-time moviegoer experience.

Science of Filmmaking Optimising Engagement

Digital technology has enabled Netflix, Amazon and Hulu to capture and integrate viewing behaviour patterns to generate personalised viewing experiences, so viewers get to see movies and television programmes they want to watch.

The next step in personalisation will be to capture real-time viewer unconscious responses to movies and used in filmmaking to optimise engagement. Although Hollywood movie studios have been capturing moviegoer real-time unconscious responses to movie trailers to increase audience engagement since 2010 (Randall, 2013), it is advertising agencies (commercials) and video games companies that are leading the way in utilising the science of filmmaking/storytelling to optimise audience-user engagement.

Advertising agencies recognise the science of consumer behaviour enables them to design advertising messages that optimise attention, engagement and maximise returns consistently. Video games companies value well-constructed narrative design that is based on user cognition, emotion and behavioural characteristics because it increases user attention, enjoyment and involvement in video games, without sacrificing the creative elements of storytelling/filmmaking.

Neuroscientists and media psychologists design research studies to capture viewer unconscious involuntary responses when viewers watch a movie, commercial or when users play a video game. They do this by detecting areas of brain activity using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) or psychophysiological recording techniques (capturing physiological responses that determine psychological traits/emotions) such as: electroencephalogram (EEG) that measures brain wave activity; electrodermal activity (EDA) that measures emotional sweating by detecting electrical changes in the skin.

Eye tracking is used to identify what viewers are looking at on screen and capturing micro-facial expressions detects specific emotions such as disgust, fear, joy, sadness, and surprise. Research outcomes can be used to create a scientific approach to filmmaking because they provide an in-depth understanding of audience-user real-time unconscious experiences to specific narrative features and audio-visual stimuli presented in stories.

Scientific Study: Audience Engagement in Movies

In a five-year scientific research study, we discovered how viewers responded to suspense micro-narratives in horror-thriller movies and how they trigger engagement when viewers’ experience the emotion anxiety during moments of suspense.

We can track the fear-anxiety process from neural messages of the brain to electrodermal activity. Psychologist René Misslin explains when we experience a threatening stimulus, the brain’s fear response centre (amygdala) in the limbic system of the brain instinctively mobilises the sympathetic nervous system and fight-flight body defence system (Misslin, 2003).

Through a neural network consisting of the hypothalamus, brain stem, sympathetic nervous system and eccrine sweat glands, electrical changes are produced in the skin (electrodermal activity) - emotional sweating (Knight, et al., 2005). Therefore, we selected the psychophysiological recording technique, electrodermal activity (EDA) to measure anxiety.

This led us to create unique contributions to knowledge. This included measuring anxiety as a form of audience engagement and developing an innovation step change in how we define and measure suspense (anxiety) in terms of durability (time) and intensity (level) to specific storytelling cause and effect paradigms: micro-narrative structures, cinematography (camera shot, frame, angle, duration, movement, lighting), sound (diegetic and non-diegetic), stage props, editing (e.g. pacing) and acting performance.

By deconstructing movies in this way using cause and effect paradigms, we could determine the most dominant narrative features/structures or/and cinematic techniques that optimised or decreased audience engagement.

Although electrodermal activity was a crucial part of the study we took a mixed methods approach by triangulating three data sets: textual analysis of the filmmakers’ intentions to engage the audience, measuring behavioural traits (electrodermal activity) and viewer self-reports to contextualise their subjective experience.

Research Highlights

We discovered when the construction of suspense was successful it enabled viewers to become so absorbed in the story world they experienced a term called narrative transportation. This is where viewers feel they are a non-participatory character in the story world (Green & Brook, 2000). According to professor Ed Tan this is a form of ‘imagined-self empathy’ which invites the viewer to place themselves in the character’s situation as if they are facing the same situation (Tan, 2013).

When filmmakers construct suspense they often include a narrative pattern of attention at specific moments during the movie at a macro (minutes) and micro level (seconds) to optimise engagement. These include character arcs that attempt to build an empathic response between viewer and character(s) or tiny micro-film sequences that are dependent on each other to optimise engagement and suspense within a micro-narrative structure.

Repetitive narrative patterns of engagement were also discovered as a means of reinforcing specific visual or auditory stimuli to sustain engagement. All patterns were attributed to a variety of narrative features and cinematic techniques: diegetic sounds, camera shots, angles, movement and lighting, POV and stage props and actor’s performance.

The success of these patterns was dependant on how story information was concealed, delayed or revealed to viewers, specific characters or both. In some instances, we found that viewers responded differently in terms of anxiety durability (time) and intensity (levels) to the same stimuli.

However, when the right balance between revealing, concealing and delaying story information was achieved audience attention was optimised. Although this enabled viewers to empathise with fictional characters, split second timing (pacing) was crucial to viewer engagement in the story world. When the balance of information was out of sync we discovered filmmakers’ ‘narrative blind spots’ which decrease audience engagement. This is because filmmakers rely on optimising engagement through creative assumptions and conventions which can lead to developing ‘narrative blind spots’ they are unaware of.

Optimising Engagement: Meeting Audience Expectations and Increasing Returns Consistently

With filmmakers taking a combined scientific and artistic approach to filmmaking it will eliminate ‘narrative blind spots’, optimise engagement, increase returns and meet 21st century consumer expectations consistently.

This will lead filmmakers to develop new storytelling conventions that are based on how viewers respond to narrative features-structures and cinematic techniques, such as: camera shot, frame, angle, duration, movement, lighting), sound (diegetic and non-diegetic), stage props, editing (e.g. pacing) and acting performance.

Receptive Cinema is a specialist narrative design and audience engagement consultancy who work in collaboration with filmmakers to design compelling narratives for movies and commercials by fusing science and art of filmmaking - optimising engagement and increasing returns. We work with directors/producers/editors by analysing the storyboard and offer scientific-creative solutions to eliminate ‘narrative blind spots’ by selecting specific narrative features and cinematic techniques: camera shot frame, angle, duration, and movement, sound (non-diegetic and diegetic), lighting and stage props, which will have the most impact for optimising audience engagement and increasing returns.

Go to www.receptivecinema.com for more information

Dr Keith Bound has a PhD in media psychology and a pioneer in the science of cinematic storytelling, narrative design and audience engagement research. An award-winning designer, he has a substantial background in innovation, design and the creative industries, specialising in designing compelling narratives for movies and commercials, and leading interdisciplinary research teams: screenwriters, filmmakers, data scientists/analysts, physiologists, neuroscientists and audience researchers. To deliver new forms of storytelling that exceed 21st century consumer expectations, maximising returns and shareholder value.

#DataDrivenContent #Optimisation #Branding #ConsumerInsights #Returns OptimisingEngagement #Personalisation #Filmmaking #Suspense #NarrativePatterns #NarrativeBlindSpots #PsychophysiologicalRecordings #Neuromarketing #Netflix #ReceptiveCinema #KeithBound

Zedar T.

Digital Marketing @ Love Tibet Readers Collection–Tibet House US | Interactive Digital Media Marketing

6 年

not sure i want to be so hooked up anyway - it is a movie, I like to munch popcorn, know its not real

回复
Dr. Alexander K?nig

Artistic employee for machine learning in arts

6 年

Are you aware that you just superimpose the paradigms of marketing and success driven economy to film? There is a big difference between "market"/"consumer" and "culture"/"audience". Most critically acclaimed Filmes are addressing social and political problems of our time, movie makers from Iran etc. got international attention because they open up new perspectives. Sorry, but i think cutting film from it's social and cultural context and reduce it to a "product", that's success can be measured, is the reason why we flooded with sequels and superheroes. One of the true creative concepts that really approved through the times is "break the rules", within the normative framework based on existing data you describing, shows like "breaking bad" or "the wire" would have not been possible. And talking about film history (a field you left out completely:) within your framework, famous directors like Orson Welles, Andrei Tarkovsky and Jean-Luc Godard would have never be able to get any founding. Not speaking of artists like Maya Deren who broke up all conventions of narration. So i think presenting film making as a market oriented process, driven by data that's parameters can be optimized, is highly questionable. Especially in times when political and social awareness is as important as nowadays, a more critical approach would be appreciable. Please don't take this critique personal, I see your text more as a symptom of an actual problem and as such quite important.

Herve BERNARD Rvb

Artiste visuel : photo, vidéo

6 年

La Chute d'Icare réinterprétée à la lumière de l'eye tracking mais en fran?ais. Merci à Teresa Colombi https://www.regard-sur-limage.com/la-chute-d-icare-bruegel-v5.html

回复
Bill Vargo

Professor in the Philadelphia region

6 年

Interesting article. I'm concerned that a filmmaker who cleaves too close to your research or uses it as a blueprint would create something that felt too manufactured or clinical. I also see a variety of practical production issues with such an approach. I am interested in learning more about these “narrative blind spots.”

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了