How to Remove Unfair Google Reviews: A Comprehensive Guide for Law Firms
Paul Evans
Law Firm Marketer | CEO at Pillar & Scroll and Managing Partner at Toro Digital
Online reputation management has become crucial for law firms. While Google reviews can be a powerful tool for positively influencing prospective clients, unfair or unreasonable reviews can damage your firm's reputation.?
This comprehensive guide will walk you through effective strategies for handling and removing unfair Google reviews targeting your law firm.
This guide is based on a live training session conducted for law firm marketers and partners. You can watch the full recording of the session below:
Do Google Reviews Matter For Law Firms?
The short answer is: absolutely.?
Google Reviews have become a critical touchpoint in how potential clients discover and evaluate law firms. When someone receives a referral to a lawyer or law firm, their first instinct is typically to look them up online before making contact.?
Our observation finds strong backing in Google Analytics data. Law firm name searches consistently generate one of the largest traffic sources to law firm websites.
What makes Google Reviews particularly important is their prominence in search results. When someone searches for your firm, your Google Business Profile appears prominently on the right-hand side of the results page, with your review rating displayed high up in the panel. This prominence means your star rating is often one of the first things a potential client sees about your firm.
Human behaviour adds another layer of complexity to this situation.?
Negative reviews draw people in - human nature makes us curious about what went wrong. Therefore, a small number of negative reviews creates an outsized impact on first impressions.
While having a less-than-perfect rating isn't necessarily a deal-breaker, it can create a negative first impression and potentially influence potential clients to choose competitors with better ratings.
Common Types of Unfair Reviews
Before diving into removal strategies, it's essential to understand what makes a review unfair. Law firms can encounter several distinct types of problematic reviews, each presenting its own challenges and requiring different approaches to handle effectively.?
Let's explore the six most common categories:
1. Valid Non-Representation Reviews
These come from individuals who were never actually clients because:
2. Misunderstanding of Legal Processes
Reviews from clients who:
3. No Formal Engagement
Reviews from:
4. Opposing Parties
Reviews from:
5. External Factors
Negative reviews based on:
6. Irrational or Delusional Reviews
Reviews that:
Unfair Review Removal Strategies
Strategy 1: Contact the Reviewer Directly
While this might be the least comfortable option, directly contacting the reviewer is often the most effective strategy. This approach bypasses the need for third-party involvement and can lead to quick resolution.
Why It Works:
How to Approach It:
For cases where direct contact isn't possible or has failed, consider having a lawyer send a formal letter, mainly if the review violates terms of service or laws.
Strategy 2: Report it to Google
Many businesses default to using the basic 'Report a review' feature that appears when you click on a review in your Google Business Profile. However, this basic reporting method should be avoided as it offers no visibility into the process, no way to track the status of your report, and, crucially, no ability to appeal if your report is rejected.
Google's Reviews Management Tool has given businesses far more power when handling problematic reviews.?
This comprehensive tool offers significant advantages over the basic reporting system and should be your primary strategy when direct contact isn't possible or successful.
Key Advantages of Google’s Review Management Tool
1/ Status Tracking
2/ Ability to Appeal
The appeal process is a crucial part of using this tool effectively. We'll explore the specifics of crafting a compelling appeal later in this guide, as it deserves careful attention and a thorough understanding of Google's content policies.
Using the Tool Effectively
1/ Initial Setup
2/ Identify the Review to Report
领英推荐
3/ Reporting Process
When you hit the report button, Google will present you with two main options:?
Option 1: Terms Violation
This is the most common and typically most successful route. The tool provides several violation categories:
Reviewing Google's comprehensive policy on prohibited and restricted content is essential when reporting a violation.
Key Tip: Choose the violation category that you can most comprehensively support with evidence.?
Option 2: Legal Issues
This option should be reserved for serious legal violations such as:
Note: We cannot provide advice on Option 2.??
The Appeal Process
?If your initial report is denied, you have one opportunity to appeal. Make it count by:
We recommend using our ChatGPT prompt template to assess potential violations systematically.
<INSTRUCTIONS>
I want you to act as a Google Review Policy compliance checker. First, I'll provide you with Google's content policy, and then I'll give you a review to analyse. Remember to be objective and base your analysis solely on Google's stated policy guidelines.
<Your task:
- Analyse the review against Google's prohibited and restricted content policy
- Identify any potential violations
- Explain why specific parts of the review may violate the policy
- Provide a clear yes/no conclusion about whether the review violates the policy>
</INSTRUCTIONS>
<POLICY>
Here is Google's Policy for prohibited and restricted content for Google Reviews: https://support.google.com/contributionpolicy/answer/7400114?hl=en
</POLICY>
<NEGATIVE REVIEW>
<Please analyse this review for potential policy violations: PASTE THE GOOGLE REVIEW HERE>
</NEGATIVE REVIEW>
<OUTPUT>
Please provide your analysis in the following format:
- Initial Review Summary
- Potential Policy Violations (if any)
- Specific Examples from the Review
- Conclusion (yes/no)
</OUTPUT>
Once you receive the initial analysis, you can follow up with additional context to strengthen your case:
I want you to provide me with a 300-word summary that explains how the review has violated the specific policy or policies. Include a reference that there is further evidence provided.
<CONTEXT>
[insert your background context here]
</CONTEXT>
<EVIDENCE>
I have included a link with further evidence to support this appeal: [include your secure file-sharing link]
</EVIDENCE>
Using this AI analysis will help you:
Remember to include any supporting evidence via a secure file-sharing service like OneDrive, Google Drive, or Dropbox when submitting your appeal to Google.
Best practices for making a successful appeal?
Common pitfalls to avoid
Strategy 3: Review Removal Services
While these services exist, they're generally not recommended as a primary strategy. In our experience using them for clients, their effectiveness has diminished with the introduction of Google's Reviews Management Tool.
Review removal services tend to be less effective than handling the process yourself. In our experience working with these services on behalf of our clients, we've found their success rates average only around 50%.
Handling One-Star Reviews Without Commentary
When facing one-star reviews without commentary, you're dealing with one of the most challenging negative reviews. Here's how to handle them effectively:
1/ Investigate the Review Pattern?
Before taking any action, conduct a thorough review investigation:
This investigation can provide valuable context for a potential removal request. Finding patterns of suspicious behaviour, such as various first-time negative reviews or a history of only leaving one-star ratings, could strengthen your case for removal under Google's fake engagement policies.
2/ Craft a Professional Response?
The way you respond to these reviews matters significantly. Your response should:
Here's an effective template:?
"We have no record of working with you but would welcome the opportunity to discuss your experience and make things right.
Please contact us at [phone number] or [email address]. - [Name], [Position]"
This type of response shows other potential clients that you:
3/ Build a Positive Review Strategy?
While working on removing negative reviews, it's crucial to build up your positive review base:
A high four rating can appear more authentic than a perfect 5.0. Aim for a strong overall rating (4.5+), but don't be overly concerned about maintaining a perfect score.
Moving Forward
While unfair Google reviews can be challenging, they don't have to permanently damage your firm's reputation. You can effectively manage your online reputation by understanding the various types of unfair reviews, knowing your removal options, and implementing preventive strategies.
Remember that maintaining a perfect 5-star rating isn't necessary – a rating in the high fours can appear more authentic. Focus on providing excellent service, managing client expectations, and addressing concerns promptly. When unfair reviews do appear, take a measured, strategic approach to removal while continuing to build your positive review base.
By following these guidelines and maintaining professionalism throughout the process, you can protect your firm's online reputation while continuing to serve your clients effectively.
Remember: This guide provides general information and should not be considered legal advice. Always consult appropriate legal counsel when dealing with potentially defamatory content or considering legal action.
Free Resources
Stay Connected
Every week, we run live training sessions focused on practical marketing strategies for law firms. Each session includes downloadable resources and live Q&A opportunities.
Don’t miss out on these valuable insights – subscribe to our email invitation list on our website.