How Publicity Manifests Itself in the Diplomatic Practices of Non-State Actors

The contemporary era is defined by rapid technological advancement, unprecedented communication dynamics, and a significant redistribution of global power. In this context, the traditional system of state-centric diplomacy, rooted in the Treaty of Westphalia (1648), increasingly appears inadequate to address today’s multifaceted and transnational challenges. Global issues such as climate change, terrorism, and mass migration extend beyond the purview of individual nations, requiring inclusive and adaptive frameworks for international cooperation.

Non-state actors (NSAs) comprising civil society organizations, private enterprises, academic and cultural institutions have emerged as pivotal players in this evolving diplomatic landscape. Their growing prominence reflects a shift in global power dynamics, where influence and authority are no longer monopolized by states. These actors actively contribute to states’ soft power by shaping perceptions and fostering international dialogue. Microsoft’s advocacy for global norms on cyber-warfare exemplifies private enterprise diplomacy, while grassroots initiatives, such as women’s groups in Northern Ireland, showcase the potential of cultural movements in peacebuilding. The integration of NSAs into diplomatic practices signals a paradigm shift toward a hybrid, dynamic, and resilient governance model, transcending the limitations of state-centric diplomacy to confront the complexities of the 21st century.

Publicity as a Cornerstone of NSA Diplomacy

Publicity is central to NSA diplomatic practices, serving as both a tool for advocacy and a mechanism for influence, NSAs now adopt an entrepreneurial approach to media engagement, hiring dedicated teams of journalists, photographers, videographers, and digital specialists. These professionals produce content both for direct dissemination on organizational platforms and in collaboration with media outlets, creating unprecedented opportunities for NSAs to engage stakeholders effectively. Through strategic use of media, NSAs amplify their causes, galvanize public support, and shape international agendas using the following tools:

1. ??Public Campaigns: NSAs organize campaigns to raise awareness and mobilize support. Amnesty International, for example, utilizes vivid storytelling and emotive content to highlight human rights abuses. Their campaigns not only raise awareness but also influence policymakers by framing issues in ways that resonate with public and political audiences.
2. ?Viral Movements: Social media has revolutionized how NSAs engage with the public. Movements like #MeToo demonstrate how NSAs leverage platforms to create global momentum, forcing institutions to address systemic issues. Viral campaigns amplify messages, reach diverse audiences, and create a sense of urgency around pressing matters.
3. ??Media Collaboration: Many NSAs collaborate with traditional media to disseminate their messages. By working with journalists and news outlets, they ensure broader coverage of their initiatives. For example, Greenpeace’s partnerships with media outlets during its anti-whaling campaigns helped frame environmental advocacy as a moral imperative.
4. ??Cultural Exchanges: Diplomacy often manifests in softer forms, such as cultural exchanges. These initiatives highlight shared values, fostering mutual understanding and goodwill. The Aga Khan Development Network’s cultural programs in Central Asia exemplify this approach, blending heritage preservation with modern diplomacy.
5. ???PR Campaigns: Professional public relations efforts are increasingly integral to NSA diplomacy. Organizations invest in crafting compelling narratives, often tailoring messages to appeal to specific stakeholders. For instance, the Tunisian National Dialogue Quartet strategically communicated its role in Tunisia’s democratic transition, earning international acclaim and the Nobel Peace Prize.

?

Structural Determinants of Publicity in NSA Practices

The strategies employed by NSAs in their publicity efforts are shaped by several structural determinants:

1. Funding Models: Dependence on donors, necessitates transparency and visibility. Publicity campaigns are often designed to demonstrate impact, attract funding, and maintain credibility.
2. State Interactions: Collaboration or contention with governments influences public positioning. For instance, NSAs working in conflict zones must navigate complex relationships with both local authorities and international stakeholders.
3. Operational Dynamics: Internal priorities and organizational goals shape messaging strategies. An NSA focused on advocacy may adopt a different tone than one prioritizing service delivery.
4. Media Logic: To secure coverage, NSAs adapt their messages to align with the preferences of modern media, often sensationalizing causes to capture attention. This practice, while effective, risks oversimplifying nuanced issues.

?

Challenges and Ethical Concerns

While publicity-driven diplomacy is effective, it poses challenges and ethical dilemmas:

• Sensationalism: Prioritizing media appeal over substantive dialogue can undermine the depth of NSA messaging, reducing complex issues to superficial narratives.
• Manipulation: Public opinion is sometimes shaped through selective or exaggerated information, raising concerns about transparency and credibility.
• Security Risks: Publicity efforts in conflict zones can expose staff and local populations to threats, complicating operations.
• Overreliance on Media: Dependence on media platforms introduces vulnerabilities, as biases and misinformation can skew public perceptions.

Emerging Technologies in NSA Diplomacy

Emerging technologies are reshaping NSA diplomacy, offering innovative tools to enhance publicity efforts:

• ?AI and Analytics: AI enables precision in targeting audiences and tailoring messages, optimizing the impact of campaigns.
• Virtual and Augmented Reality: Immersive experiences foster empathy, allowing stakeholders to engage with causes on a deeper level.
• Blockchain: This technology enhances transparency in fundraising and operations, building trust among donors.
• Real-Time Engagement: AI-driven chatbots facilitate interaction with supporters, making communication more dynamic and responsive.

?However, these advancements also raise ethical concerns, including data privacy and algorithmic biases. Striking a balance between leveraging technology and maintaining integrity is critical.

Publicity in Action (case study)

??????????? 1.???????? Middle East: During the Arab Spring, NSAs leveraged social media to mobilize support and challenge authoritarian regimes. Platforms like Twitter and Facebook played pivotal roles in uniting grassroots movements and amplifying their demands.

??????????? 2.???????? North Africa: The Tunisian National Dialogue Quartet’s diplomatic efforts during Tunisia’s transition to democracy were bolstered by strategic publicity, highlighting their neutrality and commitment to peace.

??????????? 3.???????? Europe: Greta Thunberg’s climate activism exemplifies how individual NSAs can use publicity to drive global movements. Her speeches and social media presence have reshaped international discourse on climate change.

?

The rise of NSAs has redefined the diplomatic landscape, challenged the state monopoly and introducing innovative, inclusive approaches to global governance. By integrating publicity as a strategic tool, NSAs amplify their influence, foster partnerships, and drive international dialogue.

However, this evolution is not without complexities. Ethical dilemmas, operational challenges, and the risks associated with emerging technologies require vigilance and accountability. The future of diplomacy lies in a hybrid model, where states and NSAs collaborate within a framework that balances innovation with responsibility.

?This transformation signifies a reimagining of global cooperation, where diplomacy transcends traditional boundaries to address the multifaceted challenges of the 21st century.

?

Bibliographic references:

1.???? The Structural Organization of NGO Publicity Work: Explaining Divergent Publicity Strategies at Humanitarian and Human Rights Organizations, Matthew Powers, International journal of Communication 8 (2014):

2.???? Global Diplomacy . An Introduction to Theory and Practice. Thierry et al, Part II, Chapitre 13, Diplomacy by Non State Actors by Benjamin. P , 2020