How to proceed with the enforcement of a worldwide freezing order in Spain
Jaume Papasseit
Abogado - Litigación civil y mercantil. Responsable Departamento Procesal en LaWants
Worldwide Freezing Orders (WFO) – also known as "mareva injuctions" or "freezing injuctions" – ordered in civil and commercial matters can be enforced in Spain. However, depending on the State in which they have been issued, its recognition and enforcement will be subject to one or another rule.
1.?Recognition and enforcement of a WFO issued by a Court of a non-EU member: applicable law
The enforcement of a WFO issued by non-EU member Court – as is the case of Australia, United States or United Kingdom – will be governed by the Spanish Law no. 29/2015 of international legal cooperation in civil matters (LCJIC).
1.1. Need for an exequatur proceeding
According to the LCJIC, before enforcing any foreign judgement or decision, the previous obtention of the exequatur (declaration of enforceability) is required.
1.2. Competent court to grant the exequatur
The Spanish competent Court that grants the exequatur is the First Instance Court of the defendants’ residence.
Subsidiarily, the LCJIC provides other applicable jurisdiction forums, such as the Court of the place where the assets owned by the defendant are located; only in the case that these assets have been affected by the WFO.
1.3. The exequatur proceeding
The exequatur proceeding should be initiated by means of a lawsuit by the person who proves that they have a legitimate interest in its obtention.
In the application for exequatur, the applicant may request the enforcement of the WFO and the adoption of enforcement measures against the defendant, but they may not be ordered until the exequatur has been granted.
1.4. Formal requirements and necessary documentation
To obtain the exequatur, the applicant must comply with formal requirements and provide the following documents:
1.5. Opposition to the application for exequatur
The defendant may oppose the application for the exequatur within thirty days of its notification, based on the following grounds:
1.6. Decision of the competent court on the application for exequatur
Once the defendant has opposed the application for exequatur or the deadline for filing an opposition has elapsed, the competent court will issue its final decision.
1.7. Appealability of the exequatur order
The disadvantaged party by the decision on the granting of exequatur may appeal before the Spanish competent Provincial Court.
If the appealed decision has granted the exequatur, the court may require the appellant to provide security to prevent that the appeal be used maliciously with the only purpose to delay the enforcement.?
Against the decision issued by the Provincial Court, the disadvantaged party may file a cassation appeal, which will be resolved by the Supreme Court.
1.8. Enforcement of the WFO
Once the decision declaring the enforcement of the WFO in Spain is final, the applicant may request the competent court to adopt several enforcement measures against the assets of the defendant, such as the preventive seizure of real estate or the retention of the funds it has in their Spanish bank accounts.
1.9. Mandatory intervention of the Prosecutor's Office
The intervention of the Public Prosecutor's Office in exequatur proceedings governed by the LCJIC is mandatory.?
In accordance with the Spanish Constitution, the Prosecutor's Office will control the legality of the exequatur proceedings and will ensure the protection of the public interest.
领英推荐
2. Recognition and enforcement of a WFO in Spain issued by a court of an EU-Member State: applicable law
Ireland is the only EU-Member State in which a WFO can be issued. If the WFO has been issued by an Irish Court, its recognition and enforcement in Spain will be governed by the Regulation (EU) No. 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction, and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (the Brussels I bis Regulation).
Although the procedure for the recognition and enforcement of a WFO in Spain provided for in this regulation is very similar to the one regulated in the LJCIC, the procedure regulated in the Brussels I bis Regulation is simpler and faster.
2.1. Application for recognition and enforcement of the WFO under the Brussels I bis Regulation
According to the Brussels I bis Regulation, the applicant may jointly request the competent Court the recognition and enforcement of a WFO in Spain.?Such application must include the following documents:
2.2. Refusal of recognition and enforcement
The defendant may request the refusal of recognition and enforcement of the WFO in Spain based on the following grounds:
2.3.??Decision of the competent court on the recognition and enforcement of the WFO in Spain
If the recognition and enforcement comply with the material and formal legal requirements, the competent Court will issue an Order granting:
2.4. Opposition to the decision of the competent court on the recognition and enforcement of the WFO in Spain
Whether the Court grants or rejects the recognition and enforcement of the WFO in Spain, the disadvantaged may appeal the decision before the competent Provincial Court.
As provided in the LCJIC, the second instance decision may be appealed by means of cassation appeal before the Supreme Court.
3. Other important issues to consider
In addition to the above, it is important to clarify other relevant questions referred to in both the LCJIC and the Brussels I bis Regulation:
3.1.1. Prohibition of review on the substance of the matter
Like the LJCIC, the Brussels I bis Regulation establishes that the WFO may not be subject to a review as to the substance by the competent Spanish Court in matters of enforcement.
For example, the competent Spanish court cannot refuse the recognition of a WFO on the ground that the court of origin has applied a different rule from the one that would have been applicable according to the Spanish Private International Law rules.
3.1.2. Adaptation of the WFO to the Spanish legal system
As there is no identical order to a WFO in the Spanish legal system, it must be adapted as far as possible to a similar order that has equivalent effects and pursues a similar purpose and interest.
In the Spanish legal system, what most resembles a WFO is the order of "preventive attachment of assets", which may be agreed on in order to ensure the enforcement of decisions on and the delivery of monetary amounts and other assets.
In the Spanish legal system, the most similar order to a WFO is the "preventive attachment order”. This kind of orders are issued to ensure the enforcement of the assets owned by the defendant and their recovery.
?4. Effects of the WFO on the defendants’ assets
A WFO is a precautionary measure consisting of the blocking of assets and the prohibition of performing acts that may alter their ownership (sale, donations) until a final decision is issued.?
Therefore, it is important to note that according to the Spanish Civil Procedure Act, the effects arising from the enforcement of a WFO in Spain can never exceed the provisional seizure of assets. This means that the Spanish competent court cannot order the enforcement against the assets affected by the WFO but can only declare them provisionally seized.
This is an issue that has given rise to many jurisprudential controversies in the field of enforcement of provisional measures. Indeed, some Provincial Courts have annulled enforcement orders issued by Courts of First Instance on the grounds that this exceeds the object of the WFO, as only provisional attachment can be granted.
In any case, although the enforcement of the debtor's assets will only be possible once the final judgment has been issued by the court of origin, the enforcement of the WFO will be an excellent protection measure for the creditor as it will prevent the defendant from distracting and disposing of his assets.
Jurista.
2 年Tema apasionante. Los embargos preventivos y la Ejecución Sentencia? De que sirve ganar un juicio si no podemos ejecutar?
Emeritus Professor of Private International Law, Member Ambassador, AISDC, Lausanne.
2 年Estas Mareva Injunctions me traen recuerdos de juventud; más particularmente, cuando las presenté en Espa?a en la Revista de Derecho Procesal Iberoamericano, en 1983. Guardo un magnífico recuerdo de los dos maestros procesalistas que me aconsejaron en el empe?o. Nada menos que los Doctores Fenech y Guasp!!! Tiempos imborrables en la Complu, cuajada de grandes nombres. Aquí ese artículo lo metamorfosean como libro: https://www.worldcat.org/title/jurisprudencia-inglesa-mareva-una-solucion-moderna-al-embargo-preventivo/oclc/67834322 Un abrazo. Paco.