HOW POWER MAGICIANS UNBELIEVINGLY & STATE/ NONSTATE ACTORS ARE BELIEVINGLY DOING PIGEON FREEING CEREMONY AGAIN FOR ELITE-CAPTURE OF PAKISTAN?
Col (R) Hassan Yousuf
Trainer Futurology, Smart Management & IT / Digi Tech at Pakistan Institute of Management
Worthy audience having seen the current gimmickry of the political pundits of Gwal-Manidi, Model Town & Jati Umra, we are even more puzzled with the news of full-fledged bureaucratic, administration &believingly judicial as well as establishment favorable inclination towards not to disappoint Nawaz Sharif again so as to be given Premiership chance once more. Therefore baptizing of the most disdainful convict of Pakistan history & proven anti-military & pro-Indian slant & pro-Israeli mother selling for US $ tilt of top PMLN leadership…What a culture, religion & faith don’t we have to justify all of this U-Turn ploy, besides assumingly Bajwa Sahib fiascos or “THOOK KE CHTTNA” demagogy of Nawaz Sharif. Folks most recently in a statement, the World Bank’s country chief said that Pakistan should decide whether it wanted to remain a “laggard with 43 percent population living below the poverty line or change course to take off for a brighter future.” He blamed elite capture and policy decisions driven by strong stakes of the military, political and business leaders for the mess.?
1. ??Worthy audience “Elite Capture”?is a form of?corruption?whereby public resources are?biased?for the benefit of a few individuals of superior?social status?in detriment to the welfare of the larger population. Elites are groups of individuals who, because of self-ratifying factors such as social class, asset?ownership, religious affiliations ,?political power, historic?discrimination?among social groups, political party affiliation, or economic position, have decision-making power in processes of public concern.
领英推荐
2.? Elite Capture In Decentralization. Worthy readers since long, it was thought that creating?decentralized?governments would avoid the limitations of a single planner in society. A?centralized government?often lacks knowledge and might be subject of?lobbying, leaving certain territories unattended.[3]?On the other hand, theory predicts that when people are involved in governing and have representation in decision making, public spending is supposed to be more efficient, more equitable and more sustainable. However, despite the theoretical predictions, the outcomes of many development projects in?decentralized?governments have not met these expectations.[4]?By yielding power to smaller units, money should be more efficiently distributed, but local governments are more vulnerable to?pressure groups. Failure can occur when particular subgroups of the community are able to mobilize resources to further their own self-interest at the expense of the broader community. Local governments are even more vulnerable to capture by local elites than national governments.[5]?Attempts to reduce elite capture in decentralized governments range from going back to a heavily centralized planner to providing citizens with funds to initiate projects. This last option has been criticized because the citizens’ ability and skills to actually implement programs may be weaker than that of local leaders.[6]?According to the?World Bank, development assistance is vulnerable to manipulation or hijack by elites, independently of the form that the assistance may take, because such aid it requires governmental or private agency to ensure transfer to households. It is in this intermediary stage where instances of elite capture are most common. Be it centralized or decentralized government, there is a risk of ineffective public resource delivery involved, where part of the local population will receive more than the rest of the local population. This situation has welfare consequences.
3?? .Alternative solutions. Worthy audience, first, elite capture of public resources by local elites can be relatively lessened by the presence of media to balance the?asymmetry of information.?Empirical studies?have shown that government responsiveness and accountability to ensure equal distribution of public goods and avoid elite capture is related to the availability of information and general levels of awareness among the local population.?Second, the ‘counter-elite’ approach to deal with elite capture advocates challenging elites by completely excluding them in the implementation of projects. It assumes that all elites are inherently bad. By raising public awareness of power inequalities and building local capacity, this approach suggests that community empowerment and political citizenship would be effective in resisting elite domination. This approach is not necessarily effective in challenging elite domination, due to structural dependence of poor people on elites and the weakening of established institutions. Third, the ‘co-opt-elite’ approach suggests that cooperation with elites, rather than confrontation, is the solution to alleviating?poverty. It asserts that not all elites are bad, and some of them can play a constructive role in community development. It also assumes a pragmatic use of elites’ networks and resources can benefit poor communities. The ‘counter-elite’ approach is not necessarily effective in eroding elite power, and risks legitimizing the authority of the elites and worsening inequality.